Ecological modernization can be adapted to brazil?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813531Keywords:
Ecological modernization, Environmental problems, Clean technology, Awareness, Environmental policyAbstract
Due to constant pollution and increasingly aggressive environmental degradation in the twentieth century people began to realize that the planet’s resources were not infinite and since then several proposals were created in order to minimize degradation , among them the Ecological Modernization ( ME ) . The aim of this study was to discuss the limitations of Brazil , which elements of the ME would be capable of implementation on the Brazilian environmental reality and what their consequent benefits to the country. The methodology used we carried out a theoretical study prior reading and critical analysis of the article “ Ecological Modernization in Brazil: limits and perspectives “ written by Bruno Milanez 2009 , in order to discuss the main limitations of the ME and the benefits of implementing these elements . After reviewing the literature it was found that the ME , despite bringing positive aspects , will not solve the problems of Brazilian society . There is therefore the need to think of a new environmental policy and allied to the government concerned to participate in an environmentally smartening population , in all spheres , in a massive way and only way we can entertain the possibility of achieving concrete actions , among these , the effectiveness of ME in Brazil and different scenarios that may benefit the environment.Downloads
References
ANDRÉ, Marli Eliza Dalmazo Afonso de. Etnografia da prática escolar. 17 ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2010.
BRULLE, R. J. From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog. Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement.Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4:1, 2010, p. 82-98.
BUTTEL, F.H. Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, v.31, p.57-65, 2000.
FERNANDES, A. S. A. O capital social e a análise institucional e de políticas públicas. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 36, n. 3, maio/jun. 2002.
FRIJNS, J.; PHUONG, P. T.; MOL, A. P. J. Ecological modernization theory and industrialising economies: the case of Viet Nam. Environmental Politics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 257-292, 2000.
GOULDSON, A.; MURPHY, J. Ecological modernisation: restructuring industrial economies. In: JACOBS, M. (Org.).Greening the millennium? The new politics of the environment. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, p.74- 86, 1997.
HAJER, M. A. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1995.
LAYARGUES, P. O cinismo da reciclagem: o significado ideológico da reciclagem da lata de alumínio e suas implicações para a educação ambiental. in LOUREIRO, F.; LAYARGUES, P.; CASTRO, R. (Orgs.) Educação ambiental: repensando o espaço da cidadania. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002, 179-220.
LENZI, C. L.Modernização ecológica e a política ambiental catarinense. Revista de Ciências Humanas, Florianópolis, EDUFSC, n. 39, p. 117-134, Abril de 2006.
MARTINS, G. A.; THEÓPHILO, C. R. Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
MILANEZ, B. Modernização ecológica no Brasil: limites e perspectivas. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Curitiba, v. 20, p. 77-89, jul./dez. 2009.
MOL, A. The Refinement of Production. Ecological Modernization Theory and the Chemical Industry. Utrecht: Van Arkel, 1995.
MOL, A. P. J. and SPARGAAREN, Gert. Ecological Modernization Theory in Debate: a review. Environmental Politics, 2000, 9: 1.
MUNCK, L.; SOUZA, R. B. de. Desenvolvimento sustentável ou modernização ecológica? Uma análiseexploratória. SERV. SOC. REV., LONDRINA, V. 12, N.2, P. 138-138 162, JAN./JUN. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/ssrevista/article/view/7583. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2014.
NEVES, L. A. DE C; DALAQUA, R. H. De Estocolmo 72 à Rio+20: uma análise sobre a atuação brasileira nas principais conferências internacionais sobre meio ambiente e desenvolvimento 30.05.12 CADERNOS ADENAUER XIII (2012).
REIGOTA, M. O que é Educação Ambiental. Coleção Primeiros Passos 292. São Paulo, 2ª ed. 5ª reimpr. Ed Brasiliense, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
