Profile and perceptions regarding the open street market of municipalities of São Pedro do Sul (RS) and Santo Augusto (RS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130812654Keywords:
Short chain of supply, Open street market, Feeding, Family farmingAbstract
The aim of this study was to identify and understand how short supply chain manifest open street markets , the relations with other farmers , the socioeconomic profile of farmers and perceptions regarding the fair and its participation in São Pedro do Sul (RS) and Santo Augusto (RS). Data collection occurred in October 2012 from the structured interview technique. The tabulation and analysis of data were performed using SPSS Statistics software version 22.0. The farmers were an average 39.5 years old in Santo Augusto and 55.45 years old in San Pedro do Sul. Most use family labor and an average production area of 12.75 hectares in São Pedro do Sul and 10,17 hectares in Santo Augusto. Besides the open street market, farmers also have other forms of market participation, but characterized as short supply chains. It was found that the farmers value different attributes regarding both the general condition of the open street market, as in relation to preparation of farmers for participation in these commercialization spaces.
Downloads
References
BRUNI, A. L. SPSS Guia Prático para Pesquisadores. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012. 280 p.
DALFOVO, M. S. et al. Métodos quantitativos e qualitativos: um resgate teórico. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, Blumenau, v.2, n.4, p.01-13, Sem II. 2008.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
GOODMAN, D. The quality ‘turn’ and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 19, p.1-7, 2003.
ILBERY, B.. Product, Process and Place: An Examination of Food Marketing and Labelling Schemes in Europe and North America. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol 12(2), 2005. p.116–132. Disponível em: http://www.sagepub.com/mcdonaldizationstudy5/articles/Food_Articles%20PDFs/Ilbery.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de ago. 2013.
MARSDEN, T.; BANKS, J; BRISTOW. G. Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. In.: Sociologia Ruralis , vol 40. N. 4. October, 2000. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9523.00158/pdf. Acesso em: 10 set. 2013.
MAZOYER, M., ROUDART, L. História das agriculturas no mundo: do neolítico à crise contemporânea [tradução de Cláudia F. Falluh Balduino Ferreira]. – São Paulo: Editora UNESP; Brasília, DF: NEAD, 2010.
MORGAN, K.J. (2010) Local and Green, Global and Fair: The Ethical Foodscape and the Politics of Care. Environment and Planning A, 42(8). p. 1852 – 1867.
PALM, J, L. Agroindústrias familiares e Feira Livre dos Produtores rurais de Teutônia-RS (1985-2011): estruturação de alternativas de mercantilização da agricultura familiar em meio ao predomínio da integração a grandes agroindústrias. In: CONTERATO, M. A. et al (orgs). Mercados e agricultura familiar: interfaces, conexões e conflitos. Porto Alegre: Via Sapiens, 2013. p. 78 – 98.
PESAVENTO, S. J. História do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Mercado Aberto, 1992.
POUPART, J. A entrevista de tipo qualitativo: considerações epistemológicas, teóricas e metodológicas. In.: POUPART, J. et al (org.). A pesquisa qualitativa: enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2010. p. 215 – 253.
RENTING, H., MARSDEN, T. K., BANKS, J. Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. In.: Environment and Planning A. 2003, volume 35, p. 393-411.
SABOURIN, E. Sociedades e Organizações Camponesas: uma leitura através da reciprocidade. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2011. 270 p.
WILKINSON, J. Mercados, redes e valores. Porto Alegre: UFRGS Editora, 2008. 213 p.
WISKERKE, J.S.C. On places lost and places regained: reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
