Cognitive process involved in the perception of risk in the landscape: the case of residents of National Department of Works and Sanitation Dam (DNOS), in the city of Santa Maria – RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130811378Keywords:
Perception, Landscape, Environmental Risks, DNOS Dam, Santa Maria / RSAbstract
The main objective of this research concerned in to diagnose the aspects related to the perception of risk in the landscape surrounding population DNOS Dam, located in Santa Maria - RS. We interviewed 47 people, both male and female, above 21 years of age. Respondents were randomly invited to submit their individual perceptions of identity through completing an interview form, with open and closed questions, consists of two parts. The methodology used was suggested by Whyte (1977) and also used by Sartori (2000) , which consists of a triangle methodological research triad formed by observing , asking and listening and recording . In the analysis and tabulation of data , it was found that of the 47 respondents 75 % are women and 25 % men , with a prevalence of between 21 and 60 years or older and residence time of 6 months to 50 years. Regarding the question that addresses the affective meaning (topophilia) whether the respondent would like to live somewhere else. 72 % of respondents would not want to live anywhere else; 10 %. Future studies in this area should consider broader populations of various educational and socioeconomic levels.
Downloads
References
ABBAGNANO, Nicola. Dicionário de filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
BERTRAND, G. Paisagem e geografia física global. Esboço metodológico. Revista RA’E GA, Curitiba, n. 8, p. 141-152. 2004.
BOGDAN, R.; BIKLEN, S. Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto, Portugal: Porto Editora, 1994.
BOLFE, Sandra Ana. Transformações do Espaço Urbano de Santa Maria RS e sua região: tendências
e Condicionantes. Universidade de São Paulo: USP. 2003.
CARNEIRO, C. B. L.; VEIGA, L. O conceito de inclusão, dimensões e indicadores. Belo Horizonte: Secretaria Municipal de Coordenação da Política Social, jun. 2004. (Pensar BH – Política Social, 2.)
COLLOT, Michel. Pontos de vista dobre a percepção das paisagens. Boletim de Geografia Teorética, 20(39):21-32,1990.
DARTIGUES, André. O que é fenomenologia? 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Eldorado, 1992. 163p.
GOLD, J. R. An introduction to behavioral geography. New York: Oxford University, 1980.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Ideas. Nova York: Macmillan, 1962.
JELLYCOE, G.; JELLYCOE, S. El paisaje del hombre: la conformación del entorno desde la prehistoria hasta nuestros días. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili, 1995.
MACIEL FILHO, C.L. Carta Geotécnica de Santa Maria (1:25.000). Santa Maria: UFSM, 1990.
MARIN, Andréia Aparecida. Pesquisa em educação ambiental e percepção ambiental. Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental, São Carlos; Sorocaba-SP: UFSCar; Rio Claro-SP: UNESP/IBRC; Ribeirão Preto-SP: USP/FFCLRP, v.3, n.1, p.203-222, jan/jun. 2008.
MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Técnicas de Pesquisa: Planejamento e execução de pesquisas, amostragens e técnicas de pesquisa, elaboração, análise e interpretação de dados. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.
MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice. Fenomenologia da percepção. Tradução de: Carlos Alberto Ribeiro de
Moura. 2ª. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.
______________. Maurice. Fenomenologia da percepção. Tradução Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Moura. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1994. 662p.
MOREIRA, Ana Lucia O. A Floresta: um referencial para a percepção e educação ambiental. 2005. 218 f. Tese (Doutorado)– Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2005.
OLIVEIRA, F. A questão do Estado: vulnerabilidade social e carência de direitos. In: Subsídios à Conferência Nacional de Assistência Social, 1. Brasília: CNAS, out. 1996. (Cadernos ABONG).
PIAGET, Jean. O nascimento da inteligência na criança. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1975.
SARTORI. P.L. REVISTA CIÊNCIA & AMBIENTE. História Natural de Santa Maria. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, v. 1, n. 38, jan./jun. 2009.
SARTORI, M.G.B. Clima e Percepção Vol.2. 2000. Tese (Doutorado em Geografia) – Departamento de Geografia/FFLCH/USP, São Paulo, 2000.
TRIVIÑOS, Augusto Nibaldo Silva. Introdução à Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa
em educação. São Paulo: Atlas, 1992.
TUAN, Yi-Fu. Topofilia.Um estudo da percepção, atitudes e valores do meio ambiente. São Paulo:
Difel, 1980.
WHYTE, A. V. Guidelines for Fields Studies in Environmental Perception: Technical Notes 5. França: UNESCO, 1977.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
