ADOÇÃO DO MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PRAGAS BASEADO NA PERCEPÇÃO E EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL

Authors

  • Nathália Leal Carvalho Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM
  • Afonso Lopes Barcellos Universidade Norte do Paraná - UNOPAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223611704204

Keywords:

awareness, conservation, insecticides, environmental impact.

Abstract

http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/223611704204

Complete extermination of the pests!This was the goal of applied entomology from 40 years.Although believed to be radical in its feasibility with the development of new insecticides such asDDT and BHC, cheap, broad-spectrum that any consideration of the economic order wasirrelevant. Over time, the indiscriminate use of pesticides has caused serious disruptions in theenvironment such as the selection of resistant individuals, the resurgence of species controlled,pest outbreaks of secondary importance, shrinking populations of beneficial insects, harmful effects on wildlife and domesticated animals, including man, and the accumulation of toxicresidues in soil, water and food. Because of these problems we develop the theory of biologicalcontrol with predators, parasites and methods of population control and the maintenance conceptof insects in economically tolerable levels, through ecosystem management, based on increasedknowledge of applied ecology and population dynamics. These two approaches, seemingly distantfrom each other, have common point in the perception that predators and parasites can onlysurvive if the prey also survive. Forged, therefore, a concept based on the awareness andenvironmental concern, which gave the name of integrated control. This control should not beseen as the juxtaposition of two control techniques (such as chemical and biological controls) but,as the integration of appropriate management techniques. Thus, failures in some chemicaleradication programs, an economic and a social-ecological awareness have led to the integratedcontrol approach was accepted. Currently the concern about the harmful effects to non-targetorganisms and the environment, a more comprehensive philosophy, called integrated pestmanagement - IPM began to be perceived and felt, and is gaining more adherents in order toproduce an environmentally friendly and sustainable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nathália Leal Carvalho, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM

Engenheira Agronoma UFSM

Especialista em Agribusiness

Mestre em Agronomia - Produção Vegetal - UFSM

Doutoranda em Agronomia - Produção Vegetal - UPF

References

APPLE, J.L. The theory of disease management. In Plant disease anvadvanced treatise. How disease is managed (Vol. I). HORSFALL, J.G., COWLING, E.B. (ed.) Academic Press, New York. 79-101, 1977.AGRAWAL, A. A., TUZUN, S., BENT, E. Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. St. Paul. APS Press. 1999

BACKMAN, P.A., EJACOB, J. C. Thresholds for plant disease manegement. In: HIGLEY, L. G., PEDIGO, L. P. (Ed.). Economic thresholds for ingrated pest management. Lincoln. University of Nebraska Press 1996. pp. 114-127.

BERGAMIN FILHO, A. AMORIM, L. Doenças de Plantas Tropicais: Epidemiologia e Controle Econômico. São Paulo. Ceres. 1996.

COSTA E.C., D´AVILA, M., CANTARELLI E.B., MURARI A.B., MANZONI C.G. Entomologia florestal. Santa Maria: Ed UFSM, 2008. 240p.

CROFT, B. A. Management of pesticide resistance in arthropod pests. In: GREEN, M. B., MOBERG, W. K. & LEBARON, H. (eds.), Managing resistance to agrochemicals: fundamental and practical approaches to

combating resistance. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1990, p. 149-168.

DENHOLM, I.ROLLAND, M.W. Tactics for managing pesticide resistance in arthropods: theory and practice. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 37: 92-112, 1992

DENNEHY, T. J. OMOTO, C. Sustaining the efficacy of dicofol against citrus rust mite (Phyllocoptruta oleivora): a case-history of industrial and academic collaboration. In: Brighton Crop Protection

Conference-Pests and Diseases, Farnham, Surrey, England, p. 955-962, 1994.

EMBRAPA. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Disponível em <http://www.embrapa.br>. Acesso em 21 de outubro de 2011.

FAWCETT, HS; LEE, HA. Citrus diseases and their control. New York, McGraw-Hill.1926.

F.A.O. FAO/Netherlands conference on agriculture and the environment, Hertogenbosh. Sustainable crop production and protection. Background document 2. FAO, Rome. 1991.

F.A.O. Report of the first session of the FAO. Panel of experts on integrated pest control. F.A.O. Meeting Report. No.PL/1967/M/7. Annals, Rome. 1968.

GALLO, D. et al.(in memoriam). Entomologia Agrícola. Piracicaba, Esalq, 2002, 920p.

GEIER, P.W. Management of insect pests. Annual Review Entomology 11:471-490, 1966.

GEORGHIOU, G.P. The evolution of resistance to pesticides. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3: 133-168, 1972.

GEORGHIOU, G.P. Management of resistance in arthropods. In: GEORGHIOU, G. P. & SAITO, T. (eds.), Pest resistance to pesticides. Plenum, New York, 1983, p. 769-792.

GEORGHIOU, G.P. LAGUNES-TEJEDA, A. The occurence of resistance to pesticides in arthropods. FAO, Roma, 1991. 318p.

GUEDES, J.C. COSTA, I.D. CASTIGLIONI, E. (Ed.) Bases técnicas do manejo de insetos. Santa Maria: UFSM/CCR/DFS, 2000. 248p.

KOGAN, M. Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary development. Ann. Rev. Entomol., v.43, p.243-270, 1998.

MENEZES E.L.A. Controle biológico: na busca pela sustentabilidade da agricultura brasileira. Campo e negócios. Uberlândia. 2006.

MUMFORD, J.D., NORTON, G.A. Economics of decision making in pest management. Annual Review Entomology 29:157-74, 1984.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Pesticide resistance: strategies and tactics for management. National Academy of Sciences, Washington. DC, 1986. 471p.

NORTON, G.A. MUMFORD. J.D. Editors. Decision tools for pest management. CAB International, London. 1993. 279p.

PEDIGO, L.P. ZEISS, M.R. Analyses in insect ecology and management. Ames, Iowa State University Press, 168p. 1996.

PEDIGO, L.P. Entomology and pest management. 4th ed., Prentice Hall, 742p. 2001.

ROUSH, R. T. Designing resistance management programs: how can you choose? Pestic. Sci. 26: 423-441,1989.

ROUSH, R.T. DALY, J. C. The role of population genetics in resistance research and management. In: ROUSH, R. T. & TABASHNIK, B. E. (eds.), Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1990, p. 97-152.

ROUSH, R. T., MCKENZIE, J.A. Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 32: 361-380, 1987.

SANTOS E.D., HENDGES E.A., MOREIRA E.F. Controle biológico de pragas agrícolas no Brasil. In: V Colóquio Internacional “ Educação e contemporaneidade”. São Cristovão. 2011.

SAWICKI, R. Definition, detection and documentation of insecticide resistance. In: FORD, M. G., HOLLOMAN, D. W., KHAMBAY, B. P. S. & SAWICKI, R. M. (eds.), Combating resistance to xenobiotics. Ellis

Horwood, Chichester, England, 1987, p. 105-107.

STERN, V.M., SMITH, R.F., VAN DEN BOSCH, R., HAGEN, K.S. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 28:81-101, 1959.

ZADOKS, J.C. On the conceptual basis of crop loss assessment: the threshold theory. Annual Review of Phytopathology 23:455-73, 1985.

ZADOKS, J.C. Crop protection: why and how. In Crop protection and sustainable agriculture. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 48-60, 1993.

ZADOKS, J.C. Plant disease epidemiology in the Twenthieth Century: a picture by means of selected controversies. Plant Disease, St. Paul, v.85, n.8, p.808-816, 2001.

ZADOKS, J.C., SCHEIN, R.D. Epidemiology and Plant Disease Management. New York. Oxford University Press. 1979.

ZAMBOLIM, L. JUNQUEIRA, N.T.V. Manejo integrado de doenças da mangueira. In: ROZANE, D. E.; DAREZZO, R. J.; AGUIAR, R. L.; AGUILERA, G. H. A.; ZAMBOLIM, L. Manga: produção integrada,

industrialização e comercialização. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2004. v. 1, p. 377-408.

Published

2012-01-23

How to Cite

Carvalho, N. L., & Barcellos, A. L. (2012). ADOÇÃO DO MANEJO INTEGRADO DE PRAGAS BASEADO NA PERCEPÇÃO E EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL. Revista Eletrônica Em Gestão, Educação E Tecnologia Ambiental, 5(5), 749–766. https://doi.org/10.5902/223611704204