Together we are better: analysis of coproduction in public educational services in schools of Campina Grande/PB

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133885113

Keywords:

Public Services, Coproduction, Education, Typology, Civil Engagement

Abstract

Coproduction is a governmental strategy aimed at involving civil society in improving public services, particularly relevant in the field of education. This study aims to analyze coproduction in public education services in schools in Campina Grande/PB. The research adopted a qualitative approach through interviews with administrators, teachers, students, and parents. Several examples of co-production were found, such as the implementation of democratic budgets, the adoption of participatory councils, and the collaboration of various actors in society to enhance student education. It was observed that the municipal elementary school demonstrated a greater diversity of examples, partnerships, and strength in coproduction compared to the state high school.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gilson Pereira Guimarães, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG

Bacharel em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG).  Integrante do Núcleo de Estudos em Gestão Inteligente e Sociedade.

Patrícia Trindade Caldas, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG

Professora Efetiva da Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), lotada na Unidade Acadêmica de Administração e Contabilidade (UAAC), do Centro de Humanidades. Possui graduação em Administração pela Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (2004), especialização em Gestão Estratégica de PMEs pela UFCG (2006), mestrado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB (2008) e doutorado pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA) vinculado também à UFPB (2020). Atua como professora efetiva do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA) da UFCG. É líder dos seguintes grupos de pesquisa: Grupo de Estudos do Terceiro Setor (GETS) e Núcleo de estudos em Gestão Inteligente e Sociedade (NEGIS). Seus atuais temas e áreas de interesse, envolvem: Terceiro Setor; Voluntariado; Gestão Social; Gestão Inteligente.

References

ALVES, Maria Teresa Gonzaga et al. Family factors and school performance: a multidimensional approach. Dados, Rio de Janeiro, v. 56, n. 3, 2013, p. 571-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582013000300004

ANDERSEN, Simon Calmar; NIELSEN, Helena Skyt. Reading intervention with a growth mindset approach improves children’s skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Stanford, v. 113, n. 43, 2016, p. 12111-12113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607946113

ANDERSEN, Simon Calmar; NIELSEN, Helena Skyt; THOMSEN, Mette Kjærgaard. How to increase citizen coproduction: replication and extension of existing research. International Public Management Journal, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 5, 2018, p. 696-712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1518851

BARDDAL, Fabiana Marissa Etzel; TORRES, Ricardo Lobato. Effectiveness of citizen participation in the municipal councils of Curitiba. Urbe, Curitiba, v. 12, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.012.e20190045

BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016.

BEZERRA, Joacil Carlos Viana; JUNIOR, Antonio Gouveia; CAVALCANTE, Carlos Eduardo. Motivação para coprodução do bem público: Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação, Volta Redonda, v. 8, n. 2, 2022, p. 42-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.8.2.582

BOVAIRD, Tony et al. International survey evidence on user and community co-delivery of prevention activities relevant to public services and outcomes. Public Management Review, [s. l.], 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1991665

BOVAIRD, Tony. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 67, n. 5, 2007, p. 846-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x

BOVAIRD, Tony; Loeffler, Elke. Co-production: theoretical roots and conceptual frameworks. In: ANSELL, Christopher; TORFING, Jacob. Handbook on theories of governance. London: Edward Elgar, 2022, p. 446-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972.00049

BOVAIRD, Tony; LOEFFLER, Elke. From engagement to co-production: how users and communities contribute to public services. In: PESTOFF, Victor; BRANDSEN, Taco; Verschuere Bram (eds.). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. New York: Routledge, 2012, p. 35-60.

BOVAIRD, Tony; LOEFFLER, Elke. We’re all in this together: user and community co-production of public. Making sense ofthe future: do we need a model of public services, Birmingham, v. 39, 2013.

BRANDSEN, Taco; HONINGH, Marlies. Distinguishing different types of coproduction: a conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 76, n. 3, 2016, p. 427-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Presidência da República. 1988. Disponível em http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em 18 set. 2022.

BRUDNEY, Jeffrey L.; ENGLAND, Robert E. Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review, v. 43, n. 1, 1983, p. 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/975300

CHAEBO, Gemael; MEDEIROS, Janann Joslin. Reflexões conceituais em coprodução de políticas públicas e apontamentos para uma agenda de pesquisa. Cadernos Ebape.BR, Rio de Janeiro, v. 15, n. 3, 2017, p. 615-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395152355

CRESWELL, John W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007.

GOHN, Maria da Glória. Educação não-formal, participação da sociedade civil e estruturas colegiadas nas escolas. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 14, n. 50, 2006, p. 27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362006000100003

GOUVEIA JÚNIOR, Antonio; BEZERRA, Joacil Carlos Viana; CAVALCANTE, Carlos Eduardo. Tipologias de coprodução do bem público: estado da arte e agenda de pesquisa. Gestão & Regionalidade, São Caetano do Sul, v. 39, n. 116, 2023, p. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol39n116.7667

HONINGH, Marlies; BONDAROUK, Elena; BRANDSEN, Taco. Co-production in primary schools: a systematic literature review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, [s. l.], v. 86, n. 2, 2020, p. 222-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318769143

ISLAHI, Fatima; NASRIN, Nasrin. Exploring the potential of non-formal education for the development of human capital in India. Journal of Nonformal Education, Semarang, v. 8, n. 1, 2022, p. 1-11.

JAKOBSEN, Morten. Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 1, 2013, p. 27-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus036

LOEFFLER, Elke; BOVAIRD, Tony. User and community co-production of public services: what does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, [s. l.], v. 39, n. 13, 2016, p. 1006-1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559

MEES, Hannelore et al. Typologies of citizen co-production in flood risk governance. Environmental Science and Policy, [s. l.], v. 89, 2018, p. 330-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.011

MERRIAM, Sharan B. Qualitative research: a guide to design and interpretation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.

NABATCHI, Tina; SANCINO, Alessandro; SICILIA, Mariafrancesca. Varieties of Participation in Public services: the who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 77, n. 5, 2017, p. 766-776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765

OLIVEIRA, Zilma de Moraes Ramos de. Interacao social e desenvolvimento: a perspectiva socio-historica. Cadernos Cedes, Campinas, n. 35, 1995, p. 51-63.

OSBORNE, Stephen P.; STROKOSCH, Kirsty. It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, [s. l.], v. 24, n. S3, 2013, p. 31-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12010

OSBORNE, Stephen P.; STROKOSCH, Kirsty. Participation: add-on or core component of public service delivery? Australian Journal of Public Administration, [s. l.], v. 81, n. 1, 2022, p. 181-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12536

OSTROM, Elinor. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 6, 1996, p. 1073-1087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X

PARKS, Roger B et al. Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 7, 1981, p. 1001-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x

PESTOFF, Victor. Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 4, 2006, p. 503-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030601022882

PESTOFF, Victor. Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: some concepts and evidence. Voluntas, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 4, 2012, p. 1102-1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7

PESTOFF, Victor; OSBORNE, Stephen P.; BRANDSEN, Taco. Patterns of co-production in public services. Some concluding thoughts. Public Management Review, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 4, 2006, p. 591-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030601022999

RUBALCABA, Luis. Understanding innovation in education: a service co-production perspective. Economies, Basel, v. 10, n. 5, 2022, p. 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050096

SALM, José Francisco; MENEGASSO, Maria Ester. Proposta de modelos para a coprodução do bem público a partir de tipologias de participação. ENCONTRO DA ANPAD, 34, 2010. Anais ... Rio de Janeiro: Anpad, 2010, p. 1-17.

SCHOMMER, Paula Chies; TAVARES, Augusto de Oliveira. Gestão social e coprodução de serviços públicos (F4). Fortaleza: Fundação Demócrito Rocha, 2017.

SICILIA, Mariafrancesca et al. Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, [s. l.], v. 82, n. 1, 2016, p. 8-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008

SOARES, Guilherme Ferreira; FARIAS, Josivania Silva. Com quem a escola pode contar? A coprodução do Ensino Fundamental público por familiares de estudantes. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 53, n. 2, 2019, p. 310-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220170301

SOARES, Guilherme Ferreira; FARIAS, Josivania Silva. Come educate with us: the encouragement of governments and schools to the coproduction of public education by students’ relative. Ensaio, Rio de Janeiro, v. 26, n. 101, 2018, p. 1347-1371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-403620180026001299

THOMSEN, Mette Kjærgaard; JAKOBSEN, Morten. Influencing citizen coproduction by sending encouragement and advice: a field experiment. International Public Management Journal, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 2, 2015, p. 286-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.996628

TU, Xuan. Exploring coproduction process and outcomes in public service delivery: a systematic review. Social Work and Social Welfare, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 1, 2022, p. 185-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2022.01.003

VERSCHUERE, Bram; BRANDSEN, Taco; PESTOFF, Victor. Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 4, 2012, p. 1083-1101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8

WHITAKER, Gordon P. Coproduction: citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 3, 1980, p. 240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/975377

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Guimarães, G. P., & Caldas, P. T. (2023). Together we are better: analysis of coproduction in public educational services in schools of Campina Grande/PB. Regae: Revista De Gestão E Avaliação Educacional, e85113. https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133885113

Issue

v. 12, n. 21, 2023, publicação contínua

Section

Artigos

License

Authors keep copyright and concede to the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, non-commercial license with no derivative work, which allows to share the work with no author recognition and initial publication in this magazine.

Authors has authorization to overtake additional contracts separately, to distribute a non-exclusive version of the work published in this magazine: For example: to publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter of a book, with authorial recognition and initial publication in this magazine.

Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online. For example: in institutional repositories or in their own personal page – at any point before or during the editorial process, because this can result in productive changes, as well as increase the impact and the mention to the published work.