Twenty two years experience of the Research Ethics Committee of the Pediatric Institute at the UFRJ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133871955Keywords:
Comissão de Ética, pediatria, populaçãoAbstract
The Research Ethics Committee - CEP - of Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira - IPPMG - has completed twenty-two years. IPPMG is a pediatric institute related to the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ -, developing assistance, academic, extension and research activities. This paper describes its establishment process and its activities, from 2000 to September 2022. Its history was obtained through an interview with the first coordinator, Professor Marcelo Land. The quantitative of projects approved each year was assessed from 2001 to September 2022. The time spent from the protocol or amendment submission to the final decision wass assessed from data registered at Plataforma Brasil, in the period between 2018 and August 2022. The mean and standard deviation were obtained, as well as the minimum and maximum number of days. From 2001 to 2022, 1.128 research projects were approved by the CEP IPPMG/UFRJ. From 2018 to 2021, 326 decisions were reported, with an average approval of 65% research protocols each year. The maximum number of days for the ethical decision decreased this period, 167 days in 2018 to 84 days in 2021, with the average time for ethical decision of a non-approval opinion being longer in all years. In its 21 years, the CEP IPPMG/UFRJ had a significant ammount of research protocols, with a constant average time for decision, but for a longer time for analysis in non-approved protocols. Challenges are the large volume of research protocols evaluated by the IPPMG/UFRJ CEP, their complexity and the vulnerability of the institution research participants.
Downloads
References
BEECHER, Henry. Ethicsandclinicalresearch. The New EnglandJournalof Medicine, v. 274, n. 24, 1966, p. 1354–1360.
Brasil. Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa. Relação dos Comitês de ética em Pesquisa registrados no CONEP (Maio de 2007). Disponível em:http://conselho.saude.gov.br/comissao/conep/2006/cepsapravados.doc. Acesso em 22/09/2022.
Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Saúde (Brasil). Norma Operacional nº001/2013.Disponível em: http://www.conselho.saude.gov.br/web_comissoes/conep/index.html. Acesso em 24/09/2022.
Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 001 de 1988. Disponível em: https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/reso_88.htm. Acesso em 17/09/2022.
Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 196, de 10 de outubro de 1996. Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Disponível em: https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/reso_96.htm. Acesso em 17/09/2022.
Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466 de 2012. Disponível em: https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf. Acesso em 22/09/2022.
CARLSON, Robert; BOYD, Keneth; WEBB, David. The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future. Br J ClinPharmacol, v. 57, n., 2005, p. 695–713.
CONSELHO DAS ORGANIZAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS DE CIÊNCIAS MÉDICAS. Diretrizes éticas internacionais para pesquisas relacionadas a saúde envolvendo seres humanos. 4. ed. Genebra: CIOMS; Brasília, DF: CFM, 2018.
GOODYEAR, Michael; KRLEZA-JERIC, Karmeta; LEMMENS, Trudo. The Declaration of Helsinki. BMJ. V. 335, n. 7621, 2007, p. 624-625.
HOWELL, Joel. Race and U.S. medical experimentation: the case of Tuskegee. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2017; 33 (Suppl 1).
HUANG, Xiaoyan., O'CONNOR, Margareth., KE, Li-Shan & Lee, Susan. Ethical and methodological issues in qualitative health research involving children: A systematic review. Nursing ethics, v. 23, n. 3, 2016, p. 339–356.
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Disponível em: https://cioms.ch/publications/product/international-ethical-guidelines-for-biomedical-research-involving-human-subjects-2. Acesso em20/09/2022
JONES, David; GRADY, Christine; LEDERER, Susan. "Ethics and Clinical Research"--The 50th Anniversary of Beecher's Bombshell. N Engl J Med. v. 374, n. 24, 2016, p. 2393-2398.
JOSEPH, Pathma D; CRAIG, Jonathan C; CALDWELL, Patrina. Clinical trials in children. British journal of clinical pharmacology v. 79, n.3, 2015, p. 357-369.
KIPPER, Délio; OLIVEIRA, Margareth. Experiência do primeiro Comitê de Ética no Brasil. DST – J bras Doenças Sex Transm. v. 17, n. 3, 2005, p. 207-210.
MALIK, Aisha; FOSTER Charles. The revisedDeclarationof Helsinki: cosmeticor real change? J R Soc Med. v. 109, n. 5, 2016, p. 184-189.
MIRANDA, Juliana de Oliveira Freitas; SANTOS, Deisy Vital; CAMARGO, Climene Laura et al. Construção e aplicação de um termo de assentimento: relato de experiência. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem v. 26, n. 3, 2017.
MORENO, Jonathan; SCHMIDT Ulf; JOFFE Steve. The Nuremberg Code 70 Years Later. JAMA, v. 318, n. 9, 2017, p. 795–796.
SHRESTHA, Badri; DUNN, Louese. The Declaration of Helsinki on Medical Research involving Human Subjects: A Review of Seventh Revision. Journalof Nepal Health Research Council v. 17, n.4, 2020, p. 548-552.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors keep copyright and concede to the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, non-commercial license with no derivative work, which allows to share the work with no author recognition and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors has authorization to overtake additional contracts separately, to distribute a non-exclusive version of the work published in this magazine: For example: to publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter of a book, with authorial recognition and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online. For example: in institutional repositories or in their own personal page – at any point before or during the editorial process, because this can result in productive changes, as well as increase the impact and the mention to the published work.