Validation exploratory study cross in schools using dea methodology note ten Sobral, Cariré, Frecheirinha, Massapê/CE (base year 2013)

Authors

  • Karlane Holanda Araújo UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARÁ - UFC
  • Raimundo Hélio Leite UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARÁ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133818868

Abstract

The Government of the State of Ceará, through the Department of Education - Seduc -, has been implementing educational validations guided by accountability model since 2003. One of these actions in order to orchestrate the improvement of educational quality, is called School award note ten, a measure of encouragement and recognition to the good results of schools across the literacy goal of all students of the 2nd year. Whereas the educational indicators for awards schools are extracted from the Permanent System of Evaluation of Basic Education of Ceará - Spaece/Alfa -, there was an exploratory study, cross-validation, in order to check the consistency and reproducibility of the results of excellent schools propagated by School award note ten. Or this, we applied the data envelopment analysis model - DEA - in 91 measured by Spaece schools in the municipalities of Sobral, Frecheirinha, Cariré Massapê and, from 2013, in order to compare with the contents efficiency in DMUs. The study revealed that there is agreement between models. The results showed that the 16 winning schools - DMUs - obtained acceptable efficiency ratio between 0.90 and 1.0, the DEA, noting that the schools note ten were also considered schools of excellence by the DEA model. This confluence of the models indicates that the results of Spaece/Alfa enable reliable subsidies to evaluate the efficiency of schools. However, the cross-validation also showed that there are 33 schools, inside the efficiency curve, but which have not received the Award school note dec. In this respect, the analysis lacks balance, because for that school unit to be awarded the Note Award Ten in addition to achieving the desired proficiency, there is also the requirement that the municipality where it is located, obtain at least 70% of students, 2nd year, with the level Desirable in Spaece/Alfa scale. In addition, the school needs is among the 150 ranking with the best student proficiencies in Ceará. Thus, further study to determine the factors that revealed discrepancy would be required.

Key-words: evaluation, DEA, award school note ten.

Downloads

Author Biographies

Karlane Holanda Araújo, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARÁ - UFC

Especialista em Gestão e Avaliação da Educação Pública.

Mestranda em Educação Brasileira; Linha de Avaliação Educacional.

Experiência docente no Ensino Médio, Ensino Superior e na Gestão Escolar.

Raimundo Hélio Leite, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CEARÁ

Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação PPGE-FACED-UFC. Foi reitor da UFC no interstício de 1987 a 1991. Livre Docente pela UFC. Doutor em Educação pelo PPGE-FACED-UFC. Mestre em Estatística pela Florida State Universiy e Graduado em Matemática pela UFC.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-20

How to Cite

Araújo, K. H., & Leite, R. H. (2015). Validation exploratory study cross in schools using dea methodology note ten Sobral, Cariré, Frecheirinha, Massapê/CE (base year 2013). Regae: Revista De Gestão E Avaliação Educacional, 5(9), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133818868

Issue

v. 5, n. 9, jan./jun., 2016

Section

Artigos

License

Authors keep copyright and concede to the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, non-commercial license with no derivative work, which allows to share the work with no author recognition and initial publication in this magazine.

Authors has authorization to overtake additional contracts separately, to distribute a non-exclusive version of the work published in this magazine: For example: to publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter of a book, with authorial recognition and initial publication in this magazine.

Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online. For example: in institutional repositories or in their own personal page – at any point before or during the editorial process, because this can result in productive changes, as well as increase the impact and the mention to the published work.