What is an excellent place to work? Differences in the perception of men and women in the construction sector
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465963337Mots-clés :
Gender, Construction sector, HR, Multinomial Logistic Regression.Résumé
Purpose — The purpose of this paper is to examine gender differences between men and women on the factors that make an organization an excellent place to work. It is assumed that these factors are tangible or intangible.
Design/methodology/approach — Secondary data from 4460 workers in the construction sector who responded to the Best Companies to Work 2017 survey were used. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Multinomial Logistic Regression. From the consideration of ten intangible aspects and one tangible aspect, differences between men and women were perceived in the definition of an excellent place to work.
Findings — When compared to men, women are more likely to consider intangible aspects (six out of ten) than tangible in defining an excellent place to work. The other four intangible factors did not show significant differences between genders.
Practical implications — This research results can be useful for employers and managers, who should seek measures that contribute to making work more interesting and engaging for all workers.
Social implications — We seek to contribute to a better understanding of the gender differences associated with the workplace of a predominantly male environment. The social implications are associated with the need to highlight that inequality in the work environment is lingering still.
Originality/value — Despite the presence of progress in equalizing labor rights, there is still a long way to go and this research seeks to highlight this issue based on the analysis of reliable data.
Téléchargements
Références
Almeida, T. A., Morais, C. R. F., & Coelho, A. C. (2020). Gender diversity, governance and dividend policy in Brazil. Revista de Gestão, 27(2), 189-205.
Beraldo, G. S., & Trindade, E. (2016). Novos Pais, Novos Homens? Paternidade e Identidade masculina no Contexto Pós-Moderno. Pretextos-Revista da Graduação em Psicologia da PUC Minas, 1(2), 56-75.
Catano, V. M., & Hines, H. M. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility, psychologically healthy workplaces, and individual values in attracting millennial job applicants. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 48(2), 142-154.
Cavazotte, F. D. S. C. N., Lemos, A. H. D. C., & Viana, M. D. D. A. (2012). Novas gerações no mercado de trabalho: expectativas renovadas ou antigos ideais?.Cadernos Ebape.br, 10(1), 162-180.
Cavero-Rubio, J. A., Collazo-Mazón, A., &Amorós-Martínez, A. (2019). Public recognition of gender equality in the workplace and its influence on firms’ performance. In Women’sStudiesInternationalForum, 76, 1-12.
Dantas, I. (2017). Depreciação, amortização e exaustão do ativo imobilizado/intangível: contabilidade societária & fiscal. Rio de Janeiro: Freitas Bastos. 268 p.
Del Fiaco, J. L. M. & Melo, N. P. (2011). Gestão de pessoas – do tangível ao intangível: o valor que esta gestão pode agregar ao desenvolvimento organizacional. Gestão, Inovação e Negócios, (6), 47-70.
Fadel, M. A. V., & Regis Filho, G. I. (2009). Percepção da qualidade em serviços públicos de saúde: um estudo de caso. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(1), 7-22.
Fávero, L. P. L., Belfiore, P. P., Silva, F. L. D., & Chan, B. L. (2009). Análise de dados: modelagem multivariada para tomada de decisões. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Fagerland, M. W., & Hosmer, D. W. (2012). A Generalized Hosmer–Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test for Multinomial Logistic Regression Models. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 12(3), 447–453.
Feeney, M. K., & Stritch, J. M. (2019). Family-Friendly Policies, Gender, and Work–Life Balance in the Public Sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 422-448.
Frangieh, C. G., &Yaacoub, H. K. (2019). Socially responsible human resource practices: disclosures of the world’s best multinational workplaces. Social ResponsibilityJournal, 15(3), 277-295.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileira de Geografia e Estatística (2018). Estatísticas do Cadastro Central de Empresas: 2016. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2018. Recovered from https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101590.pdf.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileira de Geografia e Estatística (2019). Estatísticas do Cadastro Central de Empresas: 2017. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2019. Recovered from https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101658.pdf.
Kayo, E. K., &Famá, R. (2004). A estrutura de capital e o risco das empresas tangível-intensivas e intangível-intensivas. Revista de Administração da Universidade de São Paulo, 39(2), 164-176.
Kim, K. Y., Atwater, L., Jolly, P. M., Kim, M., &Baik, K. (2019). The Vicious Cycle of Work Life: Work Effort Versus Career Development Effort. Group & Organization Management, 1-35.
Kolpakova, J., May, M. W., & Maar, U. (2019). Workspace management as a part of FM mission: a study of German FM education. Facilities, 37(13/14), 995-1007. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-12-2017-0117
Kurt, Y., Sinkovics, N., Sinkovics, R. R., &Yamin, M. (2020). The role of spirituality in Islamic business networks: The case of internationalizing Turkish SMEs. Journal of World Business, 55(1), 1-15.
Lee, H. W., Robertson, P. J., & Kim, K. (2019). Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among US Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences. Public Personnel Management, 1-31.
Lindberg, P. &Vingård, E. (2012). Indicators of healthy work environments – a systematic review. Work, 41(1), 3032-3038. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0560-3032
Morin, E. M. (2001). Os sentidos do trabalho. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 41(3), 8-19.
Oishi, A. S., Chan, R. K., Wang, L. L. R., & Kim, J. H. (2015). Do part-time jobs mitigate workers’ work–family conflict and enhance wellbeing? New evidence from four East-Asian societies. Social Indicators Research, 121(1), 5-25.
Rizzo, C. B. D. S., &Chamon, E. M. Q. D. O. (2010). O sentido do trabalho para o adolescente trabalhador. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, 8(3), 407-417.
Sloan, M. M. (2017). Gender differences in commitment to state employment: The role of coworker relationships. Public Personnel Management, 46(2), 170-187.
Sorj, B., Fontes, A., Carusi, D., &Qintaes, G. (2007). Reconciling work and family: issues and policies in Brazil. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 37(132), 573-594.
Sousa, L. P. D., & Guedes, D. R. (2016). A desigual divisão sexual do trabalho: um olhar sobre a última década. Estudos Avançados, 30(87), 123-139.
Souza, P. M. R. A., Lopes, A. L. S. V., &Hilal, A. V. G. (2015). Características do Trabalho Valorizadas por Trabalhadoras de Diferentes Faixas Etárias. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 14(4), 107-126.
Štefko, R., Bacik, R., Fedorko, R., Gavurova, B., Horvath, J., &Propper, M. (2017). Gender differences in the case of work satisfaction and motivation. Polish Journal of ManagementStudies, 16.
Vilela, N. G. S., Hanashiro, D. M. M., & Costa, L. S. (2020). (Des)igualdade de gênero no local de trabalho e práticas de recursos humanos. Revista Alcance, 27(3), 382-398. https://doi.org/10.14210/alcance.v27n3(Set/Dez).p382-398
Vokić, N. P., Ćorić, D. S, &Obadić, A. (2017). To be or not to be a woman?-Highly educated women’s perceptions of gender equality in the workplace. Revijaza socijalnupolitiku, 24(3), 253-276.
Wainwright, D., Crawford, J., Loretto, W., Phillipson, C., Robinson, M., Shepherd, S., ... &Weyman, A. (2018). Extending working life and the management of change. Is the workplace ready for the ageing worker?.Ageing & Society, 39(11), 2397-2419.
Webber, K. L., & Rogers, S. M. (2018). Gender Differences in Faculty Member Job Satisfaction: Equity Forestalled? Research in Higher Education, 59(8), 1105-1132.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Revista de Administração da UFSM 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.