The perception of professors of Management Course of a Northeast Federal University on the selection processes for professors

Francisco Sergio de Almeida Neto, Elisabete Stradiotto Siqueira, Erlaine Binotto

Abstract


This paper has aimed to analyze the perception of the administration course professors of a federal university at northeast that take part of selection processes have about the selection process which involved as applicants. The study consisted of exploratory research with qualitative complemented by quantitative data. This university is part of the REUNI program was chosen as analysis considering the expansion process that have been occurring on the last years. Took part in this survey 88% of the professors from administration course of the university. The data show that although in the university, teaching, research and extension compose the tripod that supports the academic making, this can not be perceived in the conceiving of the professors surveyed as an important value in the selection process. It is concluded that the board of assessment is the main target of criticism of the candidates. It needs more transparency, from the choice of the board to their evaluation criteria.This paper has aimed to analyze the perception of the administration course professors of a federal university at northeast that take part of selection processes have about the selection process which involved as applicants. The study consisted of exploratory research with qualitative complemented by quantitative data. This university is part of the REUNI program was chosen as analysis considering the expansion process that have been occurring on the last years. Took part in this survey 88% of the professors from administration course of the university. The data show that although in the university, teaching, research and extension compose the tripod that supports the academic making, this can not be perceived in the conceiving of the professors surveyed as an important value in the selection process. It is concluded that the board of assessment is the main target of criticism of the candidates. It needs more transparency, from the choice of the board to their evaluation criteria.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/198346599771


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  

   

       

 

------

Revista de Administração da UFSM. Brazilian Journal of Management

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, eISSN 1983-4659