Influence of the organizational structure in the organizational learning capacity: the case of a world manufacturer of commercial vehicles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465931593Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to analyze the influence of the dimensions of the organizational structure on the organizational learning capacity in a transport company.
Design/methodology/approach – For this, we adopted as a research design the method of case study and for data collection and analysis, using the quantitative and qualitative procedures. For the purposes of this study, the choice was made of the Administrative Unit of Construction Equipment of a worldwide manufacturer of commercial vehicles.
Findings – Among the results it was verified that: (i) an environment conducive to organizational learning must be supported by organizational organizational structures; (ii) the dimensions of centralization and integration when working in congruence tend to reinforce processes and levels of learning; (iii) the high degree of formalization has no influence on organizational learning capacity.
Research limitations/implications – As limiting factors of the research, the cross-sectional approach is considered to study the theme of organizational learning. Still, the data collection in only one Unit of the company Alpha, the number of interviews carried out and the fact that it involves only managers from the commercial and sales sectors.
Practical implications – The dimensions Centralization and Integration influence the Capacity for Organizational Learning.
Originality/value – In order to develop an environment conducive to organizational learning, organizations should make use of more flexible structural forms, which encourage people's autonomy and freedom through decentralization. Also, that organizations seek a high level of integration, information sharing and that communication is fluid throughout the company.
Downloads
References
AIKEN, M., & HAGE, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, v. 5, n. 1, p. 63-82.
ALVES, A. C. et al. (2017). Innovation And Dynamic Capabilities Of The Firm: Defining An Assessment Model. Revista de Administração de Empresas., São Paulo, v. 57, n. 3, p. 232-244.
ANGELIM, G. P., & GUIMARÃES, T. A. (2003). Potencial de Aprendizagem Organizacional e Qualidade de Gestão: um Estudo Multicaso em Organizações Públicas Brasileiras. São Paulo: Anais do 27ª EnANPAD.
BARDIN, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições.
BURNS, T., & STALKER, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
CANTNER, U., JOEL, K., & SCHMIDT, T. (2009). The use of knowledge management by German innovators. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 13, n. 4, p. 187–203.
CHIVA, R., ALEGRE, J., & LAPIEDRA, R. (2007). Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. International Journal of Monpower, v.28, n. 3/4, p. 224-242.
CHEN, C.J., & HUANG, J.W. (2007). How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management – the social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 104-18.
CHONG, C. W., CHONG, S. C., & GAN, G. C. (2011). Inter-organizational knowledge
transfer needs among small and medium enterprises. Library Review, 60(1), 37–52.
CROSSAN, M., & APAYDIN, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the litareture. Journal of Management Studies, n. 47,n. 6, p. 1154-1191.
FRIESL, M., SACKMANN, S., & KREMSER, S. (2011). Knowledge sharing in new organizational entities: The impact of hierarchy, organizational context, micro-politics and suspicion. Cross Cultural Management, v. 18, n. 1, p. 71-86.
GOH, S., & RICHARDS, G. (1997). Benchmarking the Learning Capability of Organizations. European Management Journal. v. 15(5), p.575-583.
HAIR, Jr, J. F., BABIN, B., MONEY, A. H., & SAMOUEL, P. (2009). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
HAO Q., KASPER H., & MUEHLBACHER J. (2012). How does organizational structure influence performance through learning and innovation in Austria and China, Chinese Management Studies .6(1), s. 36-52.
HAGE, J., & AIKEN, M. (1967). Program change and organizational properties: a comparative analysis. American Journal of Sociology, v. 72, p. 503-579.
HULT G.T., & FERRELL O.C. (1997). Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing: construct and measurement. Journal of Business Research, Vol.40, pp.97-111.
IRANI, Z., SHARIF, A.M., & LOVE, P.E.D. (2009). Mapping knowledge management and organizational learning in support of organizational memory. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 122, p. 200-215.
JANZ, B. D., & PRASARNPHANICH, P. (2003). Understanting the antecedentes of effective knowledge management: The importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decison Sciences, v. 34, n.2, p.351-384.
LEE, S., KIM, B. G., & KIM, H. (2012). An integrated view of knowledge management for performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 16, n. 2, p. 183-203.
MARTÍNEZ-LEÓN, M., & MARTÍNEZ-GARCÍA, J. A. (2011). The Influence of Organizational structure on organizational learning. International Journal of Manpower, v. 32, 5/6 pp.537-566.
NAHM, A. Y., VONDEREMBSE, M. A., & KOUFTEROS, X. A. (2003). The impacto f organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, v.21, n.3, p. 281-306.
POLENZ, K. E. (2015). A comparative study of leadership personality traits and employee perceptions of organizational learning behaviors. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia), Capella University.
SAKIRU, O. K., OTHMAN, J., SILONG, A. D., ABDULLAHI, M., AGBANA, A., KIA, N., & Ndidi, N. L.(2013). Leadership styles and its effectiveness on employees' job commitment. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol.3, No.9.
SCHMIDT, E. L. (2011). O sistema de transporte de cargas no Brasil e sua influência sobre a Economia. Florianópolis: 2011. 88p. Monografia (Graduação em Ciências Econômicas) – Departamento de Ciências Econômicas – Universidade de Santa Catarina.
SENGE, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Double Day.
STEIGER, J. (2013). An Examination of the Influence of Organizational Structure Types and Management Levels on Knowledge Management Practices in Organizations. Tese (Doutorado em Administração), Alliant International University, San Diego.
VICTER, R. S. (2020). Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability. Journal of Organization Design, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-22.
ZAWISLAK, P. A., FRACASSO, E. M., & TELLO-GAMARRA, J. (2018). Technological intensity and innovation capability in industrial firms. Innovation & Management Review.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
