The revolution of constructive simulation in the Global South: a comparison of the use of SWORD software

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797596435

Keywords:

Constructive simulation, Global South, Strategic autonomy, Defense governance, Operations research

Abstract

This paper investigates the strategic importance of constructive simulation for defense sovereignty and governance, conducting a comparative analysis of the use of MASA SWORD software in Brazil (COMBATER System), Czechia (SWORD), and France (SOULT System). The study examines how countries with different geopolitical contexts converge toward the use of simulation as a tool for the scientific validation of military capabilities. Through a multiple case study, the article demonstrates that the transition from traditional "wargaming" to science-based simulators enables resource optimization in restricted defense budgets, which are typical of emerging and middle powers. The analysis shows that technological standardization facilitates military cooperation and defense diplomacy, while the robustness of the generated data strengthens transparency and effectiveness in strategic decision-making. The conclusion highlights that constructive simulation is an essential component for technological autonomy within modern military production chains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pablo Gustavo Cogo Pochmann, Escola de Aperfeiçoamento de Oficiais

Graduado em Artilharia pela Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras; Mestrado Profissional em Ciências Militares pela Escola de Aperfeiçoamento de Oficiais; Mestrado em Engenharia de Defesa pelo Instituto Militar de Engenharia; Instrutor da Seção de Pós-Graduação e Professor do Curso de Mestrado Profissional, Escola de Aperfeiçoamento de Oficiais, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

References

ACHARYA, A. The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.

ALMEIDA, A. M. de et. al. The use of constructive simulation based on COMBATER software to enhance the learning of Brazilian army officers at the tactical level. 15th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON), 2023.

BANKS, J. et. al. Discrete-Event System Simulation. 5ª ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2010.

BERNARDINO, L. M. B. RIZZI, K. R. 25 Anos de Cooperação de Defesa na CPLP. .e-ISBN 978-989-9002-38-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26619/978-989-9002-38-8. Lisboa, Portugal. 2023.

BRASIL. Exército Brasileiro. Manual de Campanha EB70-MC-10.211: Processo de Planejamento e Condução das Operações Terrestres. Comando de Operações Terrestres. Brasília, 2020a.

BRASIL. Ministério da Defesa. Estratégia Nacional de Defesa. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Defesa, 2020b.

DAGNINO, R. A revitalização da indústria de defesa brasileira: uma contribuição ao processo decisório. Carta Internacional, v. 3, n. 2, p. 45–57, 2008. Disponível em: https://cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/439. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2026.

FALCÃO, J. P. et. al. Implementation of Armored Personnel Carriers in the employment of the Armored Task Force as a strategy for achieving superiority in unit-level engagements within the Brazilian Army. 2025.

HAMMES, T. X. The Sling and the Stone: on war in the 21st century. St. Paul: Zenith Press, 2004.

HAVLÍK, T. et. al. Wargaming Simulator MASA SWORD for Training and Education of Czech Army Officers. European Conference on Games Based Learning, 2022.

HOIKA, T.; KORECKI, Z. The Effect of Air Defence Support on the Offensive Operation of the Battalion Task Force. 2025.

LAW, A. M. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 5ª ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2015.

MASA Group. SWORD: a powerful automated constructive simulation for training and decision support. Technical White Paper. Paris, 2024.

MORGERO, C. A. de F. Sistema de Simulação Militar de Operações Conjuntas para o nível Operacional: uma proposta de Requisitos Operacionais Conjuntos. Tese (Doutorado) – Escola de Comando e Estado-Maior do Exército, Rio de Janeiro, 2016.

NEYLAND, D. L. Virtual Combat: A Guide to Distributed Interactive Simulation. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1997.

POCHMANN, P. G. C. Pesquisa com Simulação Construtiva. In: NEVES, E. B.; POCHMANN, P. G. C.; SCHMIDT, R. P. B. (org.). Abordagens metodológicas em Ciências Militares. Rio de Janeiro: Traço Leal Comunicação, 2026, p. 199-232.

ROLENEC, O.; VLKOVSKY, M.; SEDLACEK, M. The Use of Constructive Simulation in the Educational Process of Military Engineers. 2023.

SCHWAB, K. A quarta revolução industrial. Tradução de Daniel Moreira Miranda. São Paulo: Edipro, 2016

SILVA, I. C. da. Projeto GAMEFICADOS: o mundo real nos jogos digitais. Santa Maria: GECAP/UFSM, 2024.

SILVA, J. P. M. V. da; POCHMANN, P. G. C.; NEVES, E. B. Maximizing Tactical Success: The Impact of the Mechanized Anti-Tank Company in a Coordinated Attack Assessed Through Constructive Simulation. 2025.

SOKOLOWSKI, J. A.; BANKS, C. M. (Eds.). Principles of Modeling and Simulation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

SVARTMAN, E. M. A agenda de defesa do Brasil para a América do Sul. In: SVARTMAN, E. M. et. al. Defesa, Segurança Internacional e Forças Armadas: textos selecionados do III Encontro Nacional da ABED. Campinas, SP. Mercado de Letras, 2010.

TOLK, A. (Ed.). Engineering Principles of Combat Modeling and Distributed Simulation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. (E seus tutoriais em 2016 e 2019).

ZEIGLER, B. P.; MUZY, A.; KOFMAN, E. Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Discrete Event and Iterative System Computational Foundations. 3ª ed. Academic Press, 2019.

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Pochmann, P. G. C. (2026). The revolution of constructive simulation in the Global South: a comparison of the use of SWORD software. InterAção, 17(2), e96435. https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797596435