Attributes of payment for environmental services to watershed management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236499485653Keywords:
Management of water resources, Environmental valuation, Environmental qualityAbstract
Payment for environmental services (PES) is a public policy mechanism that combines and determines practices for environmental conservation and sustainable development. However, the PES for river basins, little used in Brazil, allows for increased effectiveness in four aspects: program costs, additionality, losses or excesses of measurement, as well as the actual provision of environmental services. Thus, this work aimed to determine the aspects related to payment for environmental services in river basins. The methodology used to carry out this study was selected with the aim of analyzing the criteria for selecting research sources in documents available on the web, specifically on platforms such as SciELO and ScienceDirect, with the period of survey of scientific productions from 2005 to 2021, verifying the frequency of these terms in research in the area. A temporal increase in the publication of articles on the theme of PES was observed, making it possible to identify potentialities of payment for environmental services for river basin management. Thus, the study provided new approaches to analyze research gaps and contribute to improving the understanding of the potential of PSA and its integration in various scenarios problematized in scientific articles.
Downloads
References
AGUILAR-GÓMEZ, C.; ARTEAGA-REYES, T.; GOMÉZ-DEMETRIO, W.; ÁVILA-AKERBERG, C.; PÉREZ-CAMPUZANO, E. Differentiated payments for environmental services: A review of the literature. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 44, p. 101-131, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041620300735.
ALIPAZ, S. Quantificação e valoração econômica dos serviços ambientais redutores de sedimentação na Bacia do Ribeirão Pipiripau. 2010. 86f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Florestais) – Faculdade de Tecnologia, Universidade de Brasília – UnB, Brasília, 2010. Disponível em: http://icts.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/7560.
BALVANERA, P.; Uriarte, M.; ALMEIDA-LEÑERO, L.; ALTESOR, A.; DECLERK, F.; GARDNER, T.; HALL, J.; LARA, A.; LATERRA, P.; PEÑA-CLAROS, M.; MATO, D. M.; VOGL, A. Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 2, p. 56-70, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041612000320.
BAUCHET, J. ASQUITH, N.; MA, Z.; RADEL, C.; GODOY, R.; ZANOTTI, L.; STEELE, D.; GRAMING, B. M.; CHONG, A. The practice of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the Tropical Andes: Evidence from program administrators. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 45, n. 101175, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041620301170.
BENNETT, G.; CARROLL, N.; HAMILTON, K. Charting New Waters: State of Watershed Payments 2012. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace, 2013. 77 p. Disponível em: https://www.forest-trends.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/state-of-watershed-payments-2012_1-22-13_web-pdf.pdf
BILOTTA, G. S.; MILNER, A, M.; BOYD, I. On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies. Environmental Science & Policy, [S.l.], v. 42, p. 67–77, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901114001142
BIOLCHINI, J.; MIAN, P. G.; NATALI, A. C. C.; TRAVASSOS, G. H. Systematic Review in Software Engineering. Rio de Janeiro: COPPE/UFRJ, 2005. 31 p. Disponível em: https://cos.ufrj.br/uploadfile/es67905.pdf
BÖRNER, J.; BAYLIS, K.; CORDEBA, E.; EZZINE-DE-BLAS.; HONEY-ROSÉS, J.; PERSSON, U. M.; WUNDER, S. The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Development, [S.l.], v. 96, p. 359-374, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X17300827.
BORTOLOSSI, H. J. J.; QUEIROZ, J. J. D. B.; DA SILVA, M. M. A Lei de Zipf e Outras Leis de Potência em Dados Empíricos. Rio de Janeiro: Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática (Projet Klein de Matemática em Português), 2011.
BOTTAZZI, P.; WIIK, E.; CRESPO, D.; JONES, J. P. G. Payment for Environmental “Self-Service”: Exploring the Links Between Farmers' Motivation and Additionality in a Conservation Incentive Programme in the Bolivian Andes. Ecological Economics, [S.l.], v. 150, p. 11–23, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917315136
BREMER, L. L.; AUERBACH, D. A.; GOLDSTIEN, J. H.; VOGL, A. L.; SHEMIE, D.; KROEGER, T.; NELSON, J. L.; BENÍTZ, S. P.; CALVACHE, A.; GUIMARÃES, J.; HERRON, C.; HIGGINS, J.; KLEMZ, C.; LEÓN, J.; LOZANO, J. S.; MORENO, P. H.; NUÑEZ, F.; VEIGA, F.; TIEPOLO, G. One size does not fit all: natural infrastructure investments within the Latin American Water Funds Partnership. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 17, p. 217–236, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615300681
CAMARGO, B. V.; JUSTO, A. M. Tutorial para uso do software IRAMUTEQ (Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires). Florianópolis: Laboratório de Psicologia Social da Comunicação e Cognição – UFSC, 2021.
CASTRO-DÍAZ, R.; LARIOS, E. E. J. S.; CUESTA, M. B. Analisis de las transformaciones espaciales del suelo y sus implicancias para la provision de agua en la Laguna de Fúquene, Colombia. In: DÍAZ-CARRION, I. A., et al. Servicios Ecosistemicos en Humedales. Veracruz, Mexico: SEDEMA, 2018. p. 181–215. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Emmanuelle-Cohen-Shacham/publication/329339301_Cultural_Ecosystem_Services_in_the_Lake_Kinneret_Watershed_Israel/links/5c02c63345851523d15693b9/Cultural-Ecosystem-Services-in-the-Lake-Kinneret-Watershed-Israel.pdf.
CASTRO-DÍAZ, R.; NATENZON, C. E. Transformaciones territoriales y sus implicancias actuales en la prestacion de servicios ambientales hídricos de la cuenca de la Laguna Fúquene (Colombia). Punto sur, [S.l.], v. 2, p. 75–95. 2020. Disponível em: http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/RPS/article/view/809.
CHOMERS, S.; MATZDORF, B. Payments for ecosystem services: a review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 6, p. 16–30. 2013. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221204161300003X.
DERISSEN, S.; LATACZ-LOHMANN, U. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 6, p. 12–15, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041613000119.
DONATO, H.; DONATO, M. Etapas na Condução de uma Revisão Sistemática. Acta Médica Portuguesa, [S.l.], v. 32, n. 3, p. 227-235, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/11923.
ENGEL, S. The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services. International Review of Environmental and Resources Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1-2, p. 131–177, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/IRERE-0076.
GALVÃO, T. F.; PEREIRA, M. G. Revisões sistemáticas da literatura: passos para sua elaboração. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, Brasília, v. 23, n. 1, p. 183-184, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ress/a/yPKRNymgtzwzWR8cpDmRWQr/.
GARCÍA-AMADO, L. R.; PÉREZ, M. R.; ESCUTIA, F. R.; GARCÍA, S. B.; MEIJÍA, E.C. Efficiency of payments for environmental services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas. Ecological Economics, [S.l.], v. 70, n. 12, p. 2361–2368. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800911002916.
GOLDMAN-BENNER, R. L. Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. Oryx, [S.l.], v. 46, n. 1, p. 55–63, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx/article/water-funds-and-payments-for-ecosystem-services-practice-learns-from-theory-and-theory-can-learn-from-practice/77C627BE33D14C8023FBAF0AC71C69EF.
GRIMA, N.; SINGH, S. J.; SMETSCHKA, B.; RINGHOFER, L. Payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 17, p. 24–32. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615300607.
GUEDES, V. L. da S.; BORSCHIVER, S. Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica. Encontro Nacional de Ciência e Informação, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2005/6. Disponível em: http://cinform-anteriores.ufba.br/vi_anais/docs/VaniaLSGuedes.pdf.
GUO Y.; FU, B.; XU, P.; WANG, Y.; LIU, X. Mapping regional differences in payment for ecosystem service policies to inform integrated management: Case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Environmental Management, [S.l.], v. 278, p. 1-7, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720313219.
IKARI, B.; BOAG, G. Designing payments for ecosystem services schemes: some considerations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 72–77, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343512001868.
KITCHENHAM, B. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University,Keele, v. 33, p. 1-26, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf.
KITCHENHAM, B. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele: Departament of Computer Science Keele University, 2007. 67 p. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302924724_Guidelines_for_performing_Systematic_Literature_Reviews_in_Software_Engineering.
LABORATORIE LERASS. Iramuteq: versão 0.7 Alpha 2. Disponível em: http://www.iramuteq.org/. Acesso em: 08 nov. 2021.
LI, F.; ZHANG, L.B.; LI, D. Q.; GONG, B.; ZHU, F. J. Long-term ecological compensation policies and practices in China: insights from the three rivers headwaters area. Ecological Economy, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 175–184, 2015. Disponível em: http://open.oriprobe.com/articles/46132022/Long_term_ecological_compensation_policies_and_pra.htm.
LI, G. P.; LIU, S. S. 40 Years of Ecological Compensation in China: Policy Evolution and Theoretical Logic. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ (Social Science), [S.l.] v. 38, n. 6, p. 101–112, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.cnki.net/kcms/doi/10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.201806012.html.
ZILBERMAN, D.; LIPPER, L.; MCCARTHY, N. Putting payments for environment services in the context of economic development. In: LIPPER, L. et al. Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes: Economic Policies and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries. [S.l.]: Springer, 2009, p. 9–33. E-book (Série literária: Natural Resource Management and Policy). Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-72971-8_2.
MARCHAND, P.; RATINAUD, P. L’analyse de similitude appliquée aux corpus textuels: Les primaires socialistes pour l’élection présidentielle française (septembre- octobre 2011). 11èmse Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, liège, Belgique, v. 11, p. 687-699, 2012.
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT - MEA. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
MISHRA, S. K.; HITZHUSEN, F. J.; SOHNGEN, B. L.; GULDMANN, J. M. Costs of abandoned coal mine reclamation and associated recreation benefits in Ohio. Journal of Environmental Management, [S.l.], v. 100, p. 52–58, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479712000291.
NASCIMENTO, T. C.; CAVAJILCA, E. S. R.; SANTOS, A. T. Sistematização de um Modelo de Prospecção Tecnológica com as Ferramentas Espacenet e Iramuteq: aplicação para banco de dados de patentes verdes do elemento fósforo. Cadernos de Prospecção, Salvador, v. 12, n. 3, p. 563-575, 2019. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/nit/article/view/27322.
PASCUAL, U.; MURADIAN, R.; RODRIGUÉZ, L. C.; DURAIAPPAH, A. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach. Ecological economics, [S.l.], v. 69, n. 6, p. 1237–1244, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800909004534.
PEREVOCHTCHIKOVA, M.; DE LA MORA, G.; FLORES, J. A. H.; MARÍN, W.; FLORES, A. L.; BUENO, A. R.; NEGRETE, I. A. R. Systematic review of integrated studies on functional and thematic ecosystem services in Latin America, 1992–2017. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 36, n. 100900, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221204161830247X.
PEREVOCHTCHIKOVA, M.; OGGIONI, J. Global and Mexican analytical review of the state of the art on ecosystem and environmental services: A geographical approach. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, [S.l.], v. 85, n. 85, p. 47–65. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0188461114728195.
PORRAS, I.; GRIEG-GRAN, M.; NEVES, N. All that Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 2008. 130 p.
PULLIN, A. S.; KNIGHT, T. M.; WATKINSON, A. R. Linking reductionist science and holistic policy using systematic reviews: unpacking environmental policy questions to construct an evidence-based framework. Journal of Applied Ecology, [S.l.], v. 46, n. 5, p. 970–975, 2009. Disponível em: https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01704.x.
RATINAUD, P. 2009. IRAMUTEQ: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires [Computer software]. Disponível em: <http://www.iramuteq.org>. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2021.
R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019.
SALVIATI, M. E. Manual do Aplicativo Iramuteq: versão 0.7 Alpha 2 e R Versão 3.2.3. Planaltina: Iramuteq, 2017. 93 p.
SALZMAN, J.; BENNETT, G.; CARROLL, N.; GOLDSTEIN, A.; JENKINS, M. The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 3, p. 136–144 2018. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0033-0.
SATTLER, C.; MATZDORF, B. PES in a nutshell: From definitions and origins to PES in practice. Approaches, design process and innovative aspects. Ecosystem Services, [S.l.], v. 6, p. 2–11. 2013. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221204161300082X.
SCIELO. Sobre este site. 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_home&lng=pt&nrm=iso >. Acesso em: 02 abr. 2023.
SHAMSEER, L.; MOHER, D.; CLARKE, M.; GHERSI, D.; LIBERATI, A.; OETTUCREW, M.; SHEKELLE, P.; STEWART, L. A. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, [S.l.], v. 349, p. 1-25. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.G7647.abstract.
SHAPIRO-GARZA, E. Beyond Market logics: payments for ecosystem services as alternative development practices in the Global South. Development and Change, [S.l.], v. 51, n. 1, p. 3–25, 2020. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/dech.12546.
SOUSA, Y. S. O. O Uso do Software Iramuteq: Fundamentos de Lexicometria para Pesquisas Qualitativas. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1541-1560, 2021. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?pid=S1808-42812021000400014&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en
STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE. The Collaboration for Environmental. The Systematic Review and Map Methodology Course. 2017; Disponível em: <https://systematicreviewmethods.github.io/dec.html> Acesso em: 10 mar 2021.
THE ECONOMICS OF ECOSSYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY – TEEB. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Geneva, Switzerland: UNEP, 2010. Disponível em: https://eclass.hua.gr/modules/document/file.php/GEO200/TEEB%20(2010),%20economics%20of%20nature.pdf
WILLIAMS, J. R. Sediment-Yield Prediction with Universal Equation Using Runoff Energy Factor. In: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SEDIMENTATION LABORATORY. Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yield and Sources. Oxford, Mississippi: Forgotten Books, 1972. p. 244-252.
WOODCOCK, P.; PULLIN, A. S.; KAISER, M, J. Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence syntheses in conservation and environmental science: a methodology. Biological Conservation, [S.l.], v. 176, p. 54–62. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320714001712.
WUNDER, S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Indonesia: CIFOR, 2005.Disponível em: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/66932.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Geografia Ensino & Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal Geografia – Ensino & Pesquisa will obtain the auctorial rights for all published texts. This also implies that the text can be published anywhere in the world, including all rights on renewal, expansion and dissemination of the contribution, as well as other subsidiary rights. The author’s get permission to publish the contribution in other medias, printed or digital, may be in Portuguese or translation, since the publication is credited to Revista Geografia – Ensino & Pesquisa.The journal Geografia – Ensino & Pesquisa will obtain the auctorial rights for all published texts. This also implies that the text can be published anywhere in the world, including all rights on renewal, expansion and dissemination of the contribution, as well as other subsidiary rights. The author’s get permission to publish the contribution in other medias, printed or digital, may be in Portuguese or translation, since the publication is credited to Revista Geografia – Ensino & Pesquisa.