Management of the Total Water Footprint and its environmental sustainability in the Camaratuba river sub-basin, located in the state of Paraíba

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X88454

Keywords:

Consumption, Scarcity, Pollution, Virtual water, Sustainability

Abstract

The water footprint study, as an indicator that measures consumption patterns over time and space, requires ongoing research, making it a topic of great relevance for natural resource management, since water is a strategic natural resource of great interest to various sectors of society. Thus the main objective of this research is to determine the total water footprint to analyze the level of scarcity, water appropriation and pollution to highlight environmental sustainability in the Camaratuba River Sub-basin located on the coast of Paraíba, for the reference year 2023. In order to calculate the total water footprint in the geographical region indicated, it was required to determine the blue, green and gray components of the main multiple uses of water in different sectors of the region studied. With regard to methodological aspects, this research can be classified as qualitative-quantitative, exploratory and descriptive, because it includes data collection from master plan, mathematical models, as well as a case study. Based on the analysis of the results obtained, it was possible to identify that the irrigation sector accounts for 74.68% of the total water footprint of the sub-basin studied, while basic sanitation requires 19.28% of the available water, meaning that these sectors represent the largest water footprints when compared to the other sectors analyzed. Taking the results as a whole, it can be inferred that the sub-basin studied, for the year 2023, presents a sustainable environmental pattern when analyzed on an annual time scale, since the level of scarcity is 37.90%, the level of water appropriation is 47.18%, the pollution level is 70.04%, and they did not exceed the critical environmental value of 100.00% established as the standard. However, mapping these levels and their environmental sustainability in the Camaratuba River sub-basin in Paraíba will guide public managers in their decision-making and consequently promote actions to strengthen the National Water Resources Management System, whose main goal is to achieve sustainable governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Allan Sarmento Vieira, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Graduated in Civil Engineering from the Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), holds a master's degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering, and a doctorate in Natural Resources from the Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG).

Íris Kaliane Santos Xavier, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Bachelor's degree in Accounting Sciences from the Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG).

Isabel Lausanne Fontgalland, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Post-doctoral professor at the Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG).

Ana Beatriz de Andrade, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Undergraduate student in Business Administration at the Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG).

References

Agência Executiva de Gestão das Águas do Estado da Paraíba (AESA). (2022). RP02 - Coleta e análise de dados: Elaboração dos planos de recursos hídricos das bacias hidrográficas litorâneas da Paraíba. http://www.aesa.pb.gov.br/aesawebsite/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Relat%C3%B3rioParcial-RP2-Litoral-Norte.pdf.

Agência Executiva de Gestão das Águas do Estado da Paraíba (AESA). (2022). Atualização Plano Estadual de Recursos Hídricos da Paraíba. João Pessoa, PB. http://www.aesa.pb.gov.br/assets/uploads/2024/10/RF-01-ATIVIDADES-INICIAIS.pdf.

Agência Executiva de Gestão das Águas do Estado da Paraíba (AESA). (2023). Plano de aplicação do FERH. Acesso em http://www.aesa.pb.gov.br/aesawebsite/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/PLANODEAPLICA%C3%87%C3%83O-DO-FERH-2024.pdf.

Agência Executiva de Gestão das Águas do Estado da Paraíba (AESA) (2011). Plano Estadual de Recursos Hídricos – PERH. http://www.aesa.pb.gov.br/aesa-website/documentos/planoestadual/resumo-executivo/.

Articulação do Semiárido Brasileira (ASA). Programa de Milhões de Cisternas. (2023). https://www.asabrasil.org.br/acoes/p1mc.

Albuquerque, M. F. (2013). Medições e modelagem da pegada hídrica da cana-de-açúcar cultivada no Brasil. (Dissertação de mestrado). Universidade Federal de Campina Grande. Repositório Institucional da UFCG. https://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br/handle/riufcg/5827.

Allan, J. A. (1998). Virtual water: A strategic resource global solutions to regional deficits. Ground Water, 36(1), 545-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02825.x.

Companhia de Água e Esgotos da Paraíba (CAGEPA). (2023). Transparência. Disponível em https://www.cagepa.pb.gov.br/transparencia/.

Demeke, B. W., Rathore, L. S., Mekonnen, M. M., & Liu, W. (2024). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade. Cleaner Production Letters, 7(2), 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100074.

Demir, M. S., & Muratoglu, A. (2025). Water footprint concept, approaches, and applications: A comprehensive review for the agricultural sector. Water and Environment Journal, 39(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12968.

Ferreira, F. F. (2014). Pegada Hídrica da Geração de Energia Hidrelétrica no Brasil – Um Estudo de Caso da AES Tietê S.A. (Projeto de Graduação). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. https://monografias.poli.ufrj.br/monografias/monopoli10009489.pdf.

Gomes, H.P. (1999). Engenharia de irrigação: hidráulica dos sistemas pressurizados, aspersão e gotejamento. 3.ed. Campina Grande: UFPB. 412 p.

Hoekstra, A. Y. (2003). Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade. Delft: UNESCO-IHE. https://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/wwc/Programs/Virtual_Water/VirtualWater_Proceedings_IHE.pdf.

Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2011). Manual de Avaliação da Pegada Hídrica: Estabelecendo o Padrão Global. Tradução para o português. https://www.waterfootprint.org/resources/TheWaterFootprintAssessmentManual_Portuguese.pdf.

Higazy, N., Merabet, S., Khalifa, R., Saleh, A., Al-Sayegh, S., Hosseini, H., Wahib, S., Alabsi, R., Zarif, L., Mohamed, M. S., & Ben Hamadou, R. (2024). Water footprint assessment and virtual water trade in the globally most water-stressed country, Qatar. Water, 16(8), 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16081185.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2023). Pesquisa da Pecuária Municipal - SIDRA. https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/ppm/tabelas.

Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (INMET). (2020). Evaporação média mensal – Estação climatológica de João Pessoa 2020. Disponível em https://portal.inmet.gov.br/#avisos.

Mezzaroba, O., & Monteiro, C. S. (2004). Manual de Metodologia da Pesquisa no Direito. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Programa Água Brasil (PAB). (2014). Pegada Hídrica de Bacias Hidrográficas. Iniciativa da Agência Nacional de Águas. Fundação Banco do Brasil e WWF-Brasil. https://wwfbrnew.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/publicacao_pegada_hidrica_bacias_agua_brasil_2.pdf.

Silva, V. P. R., Souza, E. F. de, Farias, V. S. de, Soares, J. M., & Freire, S. G. (2013). Uma medida de sustentabilidade ambiental: Pegada hídrica. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 17(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000100014.

Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento (SNIS). (2023). Diagnósticos SNIS. Disponível em https://www.gov.br/cidades/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/acoes-eprogramas/saneamento/snis/produtos-do-snis/diagnosticos-snis.

Vieira, A. S., Moreira, S. B. L. C., Silva, L. R. P., & Lausanne, I. (2022). Total water footprint: An analysis of the level of environmental sustainability in the Taperoá River sub-basin located in the state of Paraíba, Brazil. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, 4(3), 640–652. DOI: 10.35629/5252-0403640652.

Zhang, Z. Yang, H. Shi, M. (2011). Analyses of water footprint of Beijing in an interregional input–output framework. Ecological Economics, 70, p.2494-2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.011.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15