DECOMPOSIÇÃO E REDISTRIBUIÇÃO DE NUTRIENTES DAS FOLHAS DE ESPÉCIES DA FLORESTA DE TRANSIÇÃO AMAZÔNIA - CERRADO, MT

Authors

  • Paulino Bambi Universidade de Cuiabá
  • Francisco de Almeida Lobo
  • Ândrea Carla Dalmolin
  • Carlos Alberto Antunes Dias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9477

Abstract

The decomposition tax and nutrients flux of senescent andphotosintetically active leaves of three species are different because their regulation depends on the f substract and on the forest type but, the leavesdecomposition also depend on lignin and cellulose compounds find in theleaves. The goal of this study was to evaluate nutrients transference fromsenescent to photosintetically active leaves, decomposition and theircontribution on the nutrients cycling. For that, we quantified leavesnutrients transference and evaluated the decomposition velocity ofsenescent leaves, which were submitted for decomposition in differentplaces, in side of nylon mesh bags soil. The decomposition bags wereremoved to experiment periodically, fifteen to fifteen days in first fourmonths, and after they were removed between 25 to 30 days, but neverless or more than 25 or 30, respectively. The completed decomposition ofleaves was verified around 360 days. The following coefficient of regression:0,0048 ± 0,0005, 0,0059 ± 0,0007, 0,0049 ± 0,0005 are of thedecomposition dynamic for Dialium guianensis, Tovomita schomburgkki eBrosimum lactescens, respectively. The nutrients transference evidences werefound in the senescent and photosintetically active leaves, obtained bychemistry analyze of both leaves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-06-27

How to Cite

Bambi, P., de Almeida Lobo, F., Dalmolin, Ândrea C., & Antunes Dias, C. A. (2011). DECOMPOSIÇÃO E REDISTRIBUIÇÃO DE NUTRIENTES DAS FOLHAS DE ESPÉCIES DA FLORESTA DE TRANSIÇÃO AMAZÔNIA - CERRADO, MT. Ciência E Natura, 33(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9477

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 1 (2011)

Section

Biology

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.