Estimation of the energy recovery potential of biogas from UASB reactors in the state of Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X91480Keywords:
Wastewater treatment, Anaerobic digestion, BiogasAbstract
The increase in sewage collection and treatment rates in Rio Grande do Sul (RS) should be guided by environmentally and economically sustainable practices. Anaerobic digestion, through UASB reactors, thus becomes potentially attractive because it allows, in addition to sewage treatment, the generation and collection of biogas - a biofuel with a high methane percentage. Therefore, the present work has investigated the scope of UASB reactors’ operation in Rio Grande do Sul, identifying that 76.5% of its Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) use anaerobic technology, with 1/3 having UASB reactors. Using self-monitoring data from the sectioned STPs and through the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) conversion methodology adapted from Lobato, Chernicharo, and Souza (2012) – incorporating a methane solubility fluctuation factor to better estimate losses in the liquid phase –, the energy potential of biogas generation in the state was estimated in three different scenarios. The results demonstrate that Rio Grande do Sul has low potential in this field due to the large number of small STPs, sewage with low COD concentration, and high methane losses in the liquid phase. Future individualized studies that address the financial viability are necessary, encompassing the perspective of less noble uses of biogas in order to provide additional revenue to the state's STPs.
Downloads
References
Agência Nacional De Águas. (2020). Atlas esgotos: atualização da base de dados de estações de tratamento de esgotos no Brasil. Brasília: ANA. 44 p.
Akpasi, S. O. et al. (2024). Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies. Methane, v. 3, n. 2, p. 276-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/methane3020016
Araújo, A. B. (2019). Panorama, estimativa e avaliação do potencial de produção e utilização do biogás de reatores UASB em ETEs operadas pela Companhia de Água e Esgoto do Ceará. [Tese Mestrado em Engenharia Civil, Universidade Federal do Ceará]. Repositório Institucional da UFC. https://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/49704
Bernal, A. P. et al. (2017). Vinasse biogas for energy generation in Brazil: An assessment of economic feasibility, energy potential and avoided CO2 emissions. Journal of cleaner production, v. 151, p. 260-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.064
Brasil. (2007). Lei nº 11.445, de 5 de janeiro de 2007. Dispõe sobre diretrizes nacionais para o saneamento básico. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 8 jan. 2007. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2007/Lei/L11445.htm. Acesso em: 20 de agosto de 2024.
BRasil. (2020). Lei 14.026, de 15 de julho de 2020. Atualiza o marco legal do saneamento básico. Brasília, DF, 2020. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2020/lei/l14026.htm. Acesso em: 05 de abril de 2024.
Brasil. (2019). Plano Nacional de Saneamento Básico. Ministério das Cidades. Brasília, DF, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mdr/pt-br/assuntos/saneamento/plansab/Versao_Conselhos_Resoluo_Alta__Capa_Atualizada.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de agosto de 2024.
Brasil. (2023). Ministério das Cidades. Diagnóstico temático: visão geral dos serviços de abastecimento de água e esgotamento sanitário – SNIS 2023. Brasília, DF: Ministério das Cidades, 2023. Disponível em: hhttps://www.gov.br/cidades/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/acoes-e-programas/saneamento/snis/produtos-do-snis/diagnosticos-snis. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.
Brasil. (2012). Ministério das Cidades.. Diagnóstico dos serviços de abastecimento de água e esgotos – SNIS 2012. Brasília, DF: Ministério das Cidades, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/cidades/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/acoes-e-programas/saneamento/snis/diagnosticos-anteriores-do-snis/agua-e-esgotos-1/2010. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.
Bressani-Ribeiro, T. et al. (2017) Potential of resource recovery in UASB/trickling filtersystems treating domestic sewage in developing countries. Water and Science Technology, v. 75, p. 1659-1666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.038
Camelo, L., Brito, D. O., & Almeida, M. C. (2024). Performance evaluation of wastewater treatment plants in Southern Brazil. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 29, p. e20230060, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-415220230060
Chernicharo, C.a.l., Ribeiro, T.b., & Garcia, G.b. (2018). Overview of sewage treatment in the South, Southeast and Midwest regions of Brazil: most employed technologies. Revista DAE, v. 66, n. 237, p. 28-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/dae.2018.028
Chernicharo, C. A. L. (2019). Princípios do Tratamento Biológico de Águas Residuárias – Volume 5: Reatores Anaeróbios. 2 ed. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFRGS, 408 p.
Cibiogás. (2022). Biogás nos aterros sanitários e ETEs. Disponível em: https://cibiogas.org/blog/biogas-nos-aterros-sanitarios-e-
etes/#:~:text=Biog%C3%A1s%20nas%20ETEs&text=O%20uso%20do%20biog%C3%A1s%20como,dos%20custos%20operacionais%20das%20esta%C3%A7%C3%B5es. Acesso em: 22 set. 2024.
Haynes, W. M. (2014). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data. 95th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014. eBook. ISBN 978-1-4822-0868-9.
Jordão, E. P., & Pessôa, C. A. (2005). Tratamento de Esgotos Domésticos. 4 ed. Rio de Janeiro: SEGRAC.
Konrad, O. et al. (2016). Atlas da biomassa do Rio Grande do Sul. Lajeado: Ed. da Univates, 2016. 226 p.
Lopes, L. S., et al. (2020). Energy potential of biogas and sludge from UASB reactors in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Revista Ambiente & Água, v. 15, p. e2398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2398
Lobato, L. C. S. (2011). Aproveitamento energético de biogás gerado em reatores UASB tratando esgotos domésticos. [Tese Doutorado em Saneamento, Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais]. Repositório Institucional da UFMG. https://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/ENGD-8KYNF3
Lobato, L. C. S., Chernicharo, C. A. L., & Souza, C. L. (2012). Estimates of methane loss and energy recovery potential in anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater. Water Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 12, p. 2745-2753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.514
Mainardis, M.; Buttazzoni, M., & Goi, D. (2020). Up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) technology for energy recovery: a review on state-of-the-art and recent technological advances. Bioengineering, v. 7, n. 2, p. 43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7020043
Mertins, A., & Wawer, T. (2022). How to use biogas? A systematic review of biogas utilization pathways and business models. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, v. 9, n. 1, p. 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00545-z
Molinos-Senante, M., Et Al. (2014). Assessing the sustainability of small wastewater treatment systems: A composite indicator approach. Science of the total environment, v. 497, p. 607-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.026
Nair, A. T., & Ahammed, M. M. (2015). The reuse of water treatment sludge as a coagulant for post-treatment of UASB reactor treating urban wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 96, p. 272-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.037
Nogueira, F. P., & Gaspar, G. A. M. G. (2020). Geração de eletricidade a partir do biogás da ETE São José em Varginha-MG: Análise do potencial e a viabilidade do aproveitamento. Varginha, Minas Gerais, Brasil. http://repositorio.unis.edu.br/handle/prefix/1396
Noyola, A., Morgan-Sagastume, J. M., & Lopez-Hernandez, J. E. (2006). Treatment of biogas produced in anaerobic reactors for domestic wastewater: odor control and energy/resource recovery. Reviews in environmental science and bio/technology, v. 5, n. 1, p. 93-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-005-2754-6
Popovic, T., Kraslawski, A., & Avramenko, Y. (2013). Applicability of sustainability indicators to wastewater treatment processes. Computer aided chemical engineering, p. 931-936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63234-0.50156-1
Probiogás. (2017). Guia técnico de aproveitamento energético de biogás em estações de tratamento de esgoto. 2 ed. Brasília: Ministério das Cidades, 186p. 2017.
Rio Grande Do Sul. (2018). Resolução CONSEMA nº 372, de 22 de fevereiro de 2018. Rio Grande do Sul: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente e Infraestrutura, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.sema.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivos/202112/23105618-consema-372-2018-atividades-licenciaviesmunicipios.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de agosto de 2024.
Ribeiro, M. P., & Botari, A. (2022). Eficiência da remoção de DQO, surfactantes e de óleos e graxas totais na estação de tratamento de esgoto vila city na cidade de Paranavaí–Paraná. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 3874-3884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv5n1-331
Rosa, A. P., et al. (2016). Potencial energético e alternativas para o aproveitamento do biogás e lodo de reatores UASB: estudo de caso Estação de tratamento de efluentes Laboreaux (Itabira). Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, v. 21, p. 315-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-41522016123321
Rosa, A. P., Et Al. (2018). Assessing the potential of renewable energy sources (biogas and sludge) in a full-scale UASB-based treatment plant. Renewable Energy, v. 124, p. 21-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.025
Silva, T. C. F., Possetti, G. R. C., & Coelho, S. (2014). Avaliação do Potencial de Produção de Energia a partir do Biogás Gerado no Tratamento de Esgotos Domésticos. Congresso Brasileiro de Planejamento Energético, Florianópolis, ago. 2014.
Souza, C. L. (2010). Estudo das Rotas de Formação, Transporte e Consumo dos Gases Metano e Sulfeto de Hidrogênio Resultantes do Tratamento de Esgoto Doméstico em Reatores UASB. [Tese Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais]. Repositório Institucional da UFMG. https://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/ENGD-89WQAC
Souza, C. L. D. et al. (2019). Subprodutos gasosos do tratamento de esgotos. In: SANTOS, A. B. D. Caracterização, Tratamento e Gerenciamento de Subprodutos de Correntes de Esgotos Segregadas e Não Segregadas em Empreendimentos Habitacionais. Fortaleza: Imprece, 2019. Cap. 7, p. 573-663.
Valente, V. B. (2015). Análise de Viabilidade Econômica e Escala Mínima de Uso do Biogás de Reatores Anaeróbios em Estações de Tratamento de Esgoto no Brasil. [Tese Mestrado em Planejamento Energético, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro]. https://www.oasisbr.ibict.br/vufind/Record/BRCRIS_3e1987d80cc9556b1995b2c7cd7a6034
Von Sperling, M. (2005). Introdução à qualidade das águas e ao tratamento de esgotos: princípios do tratamento biológico de águas residuárias. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2005, 452 p.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
