Wood anatomy of Eugenia involucrata DC. (Myrtaceae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25314Abstract
This work describes the wood anatomy of Eugenia involucrate DC., a small tree from southern Brazil, Paraquay and Argentina.
The wood anatomical characteristics are discussed with respect to the species habitat and the wood taxonomy of Eugenia and family Myrtaceae.Downloads
References
BRAZIER, J. D. & FRANKLIN, G. L. Identification of hardwoods - a microscope key. For. Prod. Res. B., London, 1961. 96 p.
COMISION PANAMERICANA DE NORMAS TECNICAS. 30:1 - 019, novembro, 1973.
DADSWELL, H.E. & ECKERSLEY, A.M. The identification of the principal commercial Australian timbers other than Eucalypts. Tech. Pap. For. Prod. Res. Aust. nº 16, 1935. 102 p.
IFJU, G. Quantitative wood anatomy - a stereoloqical approach. Balcksburg, VPI / IPT, 1977. 26 p.
LEGRAND, C.D. & KLEIN, R.M. Mirtáceas. In: REITZ, P. R. Flora Ilustrada Catarinense. Itajaí, Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues, 1969: 47-216.
LEGRAND, C.D. & KLEIN, R.M. Mirtáceas, In: REITZ, P.R. Flora Ilustraada Catarinense. Itajaí, Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues, 1978 :733-876.
MARCHIORI, J. N. C. Estudo anatômico do xilema secundário e da casca de alguumas espécies dos gêneros Acacia e Mimosa, nativas no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Curitiba, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 1980. 186 f. Tese de Mestrado.
METCALFE, C. R. & CHALK, L. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972. 1500 p.
NOVRUZOVA, Z. A. The water conducting system of trees and shrubs in relation to ecology. Baku, Izdatel 'stvo Akademii Naur Azerbaijan S. S. R. 1968.
PIO CORRÊA, M. Dicionário das plantas úteis do Brasil e das exóticas cultivadas. Rio de Janeiro, Ministério da Agricultura Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal, 1974. V.5. 687 p.
RECORD, S. J. & HESS, R. W. Timbers of the New World. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1949. 640 p.
SILVA, P. F. da. Características Físico-Mecânicas de espécies lenhosas do suI do Brasil: Porto Alegre, Instituto Tecnológico do Rio Grande do Sul, 1967. Bol. nº 42. 41 p.
STARR, A. M. Comparative anatomy of dune plants. Botanical Gazette, 54: 265-305, 1912.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
