A proposal on integrated teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25016Abstract
The present papers consists of an interpretative analysis of concepts and approaches on Integrated Teaching. Its theorethical suport comes from the Piagetian concept of mental development and the gestalt concept of learning.
Its purpose is to propose a renewad systematization coherent with current teaching directions, which through the development of logical reasoning and a critical mind help make the student capable in solving problems and deciding between options in values according to human nature.
Downloads
References
BORDENAVE, J.D.; PEREIRA, A. Estratégia de ensino-aprendizagem. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1977. 312p.
BRASIL. MEC. Lei 5692/71. Diário Oficial 12/08/71 e 18/08/71.
CHIAROTTINO, Z.R. Piaget: modelo e estrutura. Rio de Janeiro, José Olympio, 1972. 94p.
FREDERICK, A.D. o ensino integrado de ciências. Revista do Centro de Educação-UFSM. Santa Maria, 1 (1) 35:45, 1979.
GEEMPA/INEP. Integração do ensino no currículo por atividades e por área de estudos. Relatório final. Porto Alegre, 1977.
MOORE, T.W. Educational: theory an introduction. London. Roulledge Kigan Paul, 1974.
PIAGET, J. Lógica y psicología. Barcelona. A. Redondo, 1969. 173p.
PIAGET, J. El nacimiento de la inteligencia en el niño. Madrid, Aguilar, 1969. 314p.
PIAGET, J. Seis estudos de psicologia. Rio de Janeiro, Forense, 1969. 146p.
PIAGET, J. A epistemologia genética. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1971. 1l0p.
PIAGET, J. e GARCIA, R. Las explicaciones causales. Barcelona, Barral, 1973. 233p.
PIAGET, J. Psicología y epistemología. Barcelona, Ariel, 1973, 189p.
PIAGET, J.; INHELDER, B. Gênese das estruturas lógicas elementares. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar/MEC, 1975. 356p.
ZILLES, U. Interdisciplinaridade no ensino e na pesquisa. Revista do Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas-UFSM. Santa Maria 4 (2): 219-229, 1979.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
