FLOOD RECORDS IN THE URBAN AREA OF SANTA CRUZ DO SUL BETWEEN THE YEARS 1980 AND 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X17324Keywords:
Inventário, Inundações, Santa Cruz do Sul.Abstract
The knowledge of periodicity, recurrence, or even increasing severity of causative processes over time damage, are important elements in the diagnosis and implementation of mitigation actions. This paper present an inventory of the floods in the period from 1980 to 2013 in Santa Cruz do Sul, a city located in the central portion Centre-East of the Rio Grande do Sul state. As sources were used inventory held by Reckziegel (2007), the Bank of Registration Disaster Data da Secretaria de Defesa Civil Nacional – SNDC, the Defesa Civl of Rio Grande do Sul state and newspapers. The studies showed thirty-three records of floods being more significant in the summer months. Besides the inventory identified the presence of problems linked to flooding in at least 22 neighborhoods in different parts of the urban area of the municipality.Downloads
References
AMARAL, R do; RIBEIRO, R. R: Inundação e Enchentes. In TOMINAGA, L. K.; SANTORO, J.; AMARAL, R. (org.). Desastres Naturais: conhecer para prevenir. São Paulo: Instituto Geológico, 2009. p. 39-52
BERTÊ, A. M. A. Problemas ambientais no Rio Grande do Sul. In: VERDUM, R.; BASSO, L. A.; SUERTEGARAY, D. M. A. (Org.). Rio Grande do Sul: paisagens e territórios em transformação. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2004. P 71- 83.
BRASIL. Lei 12.608, de 12 de abril de 2012, disponível em http://www.planalto.gov.br. Acesso em: 27 de maio, 2013.
_______. Ministério da Integração Nacional / Secretaria Nacional de Defesa Civil / Centro Nacional de Gerenciamento de Riscos e Desastres. Anuário brasileiro de desastres naturais: 2012 / Centro Nacional de Gerenciamento de Riscos e Desastres. CENAD, Brasília, 2012. 84 p.
CASTRO, A. L. C. de. Manual de desastres: desastres naturais. Brasília: Ministério da Integração Nacional, 2003. 174 p.
DEFESA CIVIL DE SANTA CRUZ DO SUL. Disponível em: http://defesacivilsantacruz.blogspot.com.br.
DEFESA CIVIL DO ESTADO DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Disponível em: http://www.defesacivil.rs.gov.br/.
DIÁRIO REGIONAL. Santa Cruz do Sul, 18 set. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.diarioregionalrs.com.br
EM-DAT: The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels (Belgium); Disponível em: www.emdat.be.
GAZETA DO SUL, Santa Cruz do Sul, ANO 67, Nº 75. 25 Abr. 2011. Disponível em: http://www.grupogaz.com.br
_______________, Santa Cruz do Sul, ANO 69, Nº 272, 11 Dez. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.grupogaz.com.br
_______________, Santa Cruz do Sul, ANO 65, Nº 293, 05 Jan. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.grupogaz.com.br
_______________, Santa Cruz do Sul, ANO 69, Nº 287, 30 Dez. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.grupogaz.com.br
KOBIYAMA, M. (org.). Prevenção de desastres naturais: conceitos básicos. Curitiba: Ed. Organic Trading , 2006. 109p.
PORTAL GAZ, Gazeta Grupo de Comunicações. Disponível em: http://www.gaz.com.br.
RECKZIEGEL, B. W. (2007). Levantamento dos Desastres desencadeados por Eventos Naturais Adversos no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul no Período de 1980 a 2005. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2007.
ROBAINA, L. E. de S. ; TRENTIN, R. (Org.). Desastres naturais no Rio Grande do Sul. Editora UFSM, Santa Maria, 2013. 496 p.
VEYRET, Y. Os Riscos: O homem como agressor e vítima do Meio Ambiente. Tradução: Dílson Ferreira da Cruz. São Paulo: Contexto, 2007.
ZERO HORA. Porto Alegre, 08 nov. 2009. Disponível em: http://zerohora.clicrbs.com.br.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
