Conventional appendectomy versus laparoscopic by SUS: a descriptive and tranverse study on hospitalizations in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236583445310Keywords:
Appendicitis, Appendectomy, Laparoscopic surgery, Epidemiology, Health Services Research.Abstract
For more than a century, conventional (open) appendectomy was the only standard treatment for appendicitis. However, the videolaparoscopic approach (VLP), a contemporary and more sophisticated technique, has revolutionized the management of this pathology. Objective: this study aims to carry out a descriptive and cross-sectional analysis of hospital admissions for conventional and laparoscopic appendectomy performed by SUS in Brazil. Methods: this is a descriptive and cross-sectional study, carried out through the analysis of secondary data, from the Hospital Information System (SIH), on appendectomies (conventional and laparoscopic) that occurred in the Unified Health System (SUS), in the Brazil, from 2009 to 2018. Results: videolaparoscopic surgery showed a lower number of deaths from procedures, a lower mortality rate and a higher cost per hospitalization, compared to conventional surgery. The average length of days of hospital stay had no statistically significant difference between the techniques. In addition, for both techniques (either open or VLP), the data suggest an increasing increase in the total number and average value of hospitalization. As for the temporal evolution, for both techniques, the numbers suggest a decreasing rate for the average hospital stay and the mortality rate. Final considerations: video appendectomy at SUS presented more assistance and financial advantages, suggesting that funding policies and incentives to expand the realization of this method be created, compared to the open method.Downloads
References
Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, et al. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 1997; 21:313.
Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983; 15(2):59–64.
Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, doubled-blind study. Advances in Surgery 2006; 40: 1–19.
Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 11:CD001546.
Andersson RE. Short-term complications and long-term morbidity of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort. Br J Surg 2014; 101:1135.
Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15:48.
Navarini D, et al. Apendicectomia laparoscópica versus aberta: análise retrospectiva. Rev HCPA 2009;29(2):115-119.
Panton ON, Samson C, Segal J, Panton R. A four-year experience with laparoscopy in the management of apendicitis. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 538-541.
Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E Laparoscopic vs Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis. A Randomized Prospective Study. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(9): 1193-5.
Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015; 386:1278.