Environmental experiences of an interdisciplinary pedagogical practice in Vila of Itaúnas Conceição da Barra, ES

Authors

  • Rosiane Lima Demoner Faculdades Intergradas de Aracruz, Aracruz, ES

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087767

Keywords:

Environmental Education, Itaúnas Fundão School

Abstract

This paper reports on the pedagogical experiment performed in the public university “EMEF. Eloy Miranda “, located in the municipality of Fundão, in Espírito Santo, with students of 7th year, starting in 2010 and continuing in 2011. The objective was to provide students with experiences and recognition of teaching experience and environmental, to discuss the main points of fragility and potential, as well as forms of resistance taken today and everyday life of the subjects who followed and are still experiencing the causes of impacts of deforestation and improper land use. To perform the work developed a diagnostic social, cultural and environmental carried through a field study involving the town and village of Fundão Itaúnas being recorded conversations and interviews with locals in a Field Journal, contemplating in an interdisciplinary way. The teaching experience allowed students to meet in the Village of Itaúnas reflections of environmental disasters and reflect their current actions / attitudes to the environmental and social disasters of its municipality are minimized, besides providing interaction with popular wisdom, exploring the sensitivity of direct contact of students and experience a new culture, history and knowledge built up over the years. And due to the importance of mainstreaming knowledge, currently inserted in Political Pedagogical School Project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rosiane Lima Demoner, Faculdades Intergradas de Aracruz, Aracruz, ES

Graduada em licenciatura plena em Ciências Biológicas (ESFA) e Pedagogia (CESA); Especialista em Gestão Ambiental e Educação Ambiental (FIJ); Mestranda Profissional em Tecnologia Ambiental (FAACZ); Pos-graduanda "Lato Sensu" em Informática na Educação (IFES - UAB). Professora de Ciências e Mediadora de Informática Educacional na rede municipal de ensino.

References

BOFF, L. Saber cuidar, Ética do humano – compaixão da terra. Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 1999.

MATURANA, H. A ontologia da realidade. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, 1999.

MORIN, E. Introdução ao pensamento complexo. Porto Alegre: Ed. Sulina, 3ª edição, 2007.

RODRIGUES, L. D. Conhecimento e Ressignificação: A prática pedagógica em Educação Ambiental. In: BAGGIO, A; BARCELOS, V. (orgs.) Educação ambiental e complexidade: entre pensamentos e ações. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC, 2008.

SATO, M. Apaixonadamente pesquisadora em educação ambiental. Revista Educação Teoria e Prática, Rio Claro, v. 9, n. 16/17, p. 24-35, 2001.

TRISTÃO, M. A educação ambiental na formação de professores: redes de saberes. São Paulo: Annablume, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2013-08-30

How to Cite

Demoner, R. L. (2013). Environmental experiences of an interdisciplinary pedagogical practice in Vila of Itaúnas Conceição da Barra, ES. Monografias Ambientais, 12(12), 2785–2788. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087767

Issue

REMOA, V. 12, N. 12, MAIO-AGO., 2013

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.