Unconsciousness of builders front the environmental management ofconstructions sites: a case study in the southern region of João Pessoa / PB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087204Keywords:
Civil construction, Builder, Management the construction siteAbstract
The construction industry is one of the oldest industries, with significant participation in theBrazilian Rough Product Internal. However, there are construction sites where constructiontechnology employed is precarious, favoring waste in the execution of their works, generating alarge volume of RCD. The scope of this paper is to analyze the environmental awareness ofmanagers of construction companies in João Pessoa / PB, since the management of constructionsites depends not only civil engineers. Information was obtained through interviews withrepresentatives of five builders and SINDUSCON-JP. The results of the interviews showed that onlytwo of the companies surveyed were knowledgeable about the legislation of RCD and said makethe management of these, and the representative of another company no knew the CONAMAresolutions. Thus, it identifies a deficiency of managers of construction companies consulted inrelation to the management of RCD.
Downloads
References
BRASIL, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas/ABNT. NBR 1367 – Áreas de vivência em canteiros de obras. 1991.
BRASIL. Resolução CONAMA nº. 307, de 5 de julho de 2002. Estabelece diretrizes, critérios e procedimentos para a gestão dos resíduos da construção civil. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 2002.
CIMINELLI, R.R. Recursos Minerais Industriais. In: Geologia, Tectônica e Recursos Minerais do Brasil, Cap. IX. Brasília, 2003.
CONSTRUBUSINESS. Agenda para o setor. Sinduscon-SP. In: SEMINÁRIO DA INDÚSTRIA BRAILEIRA DE CONSTRUÇÃO, 2003, São Paulo. Apresentações. São Paulo: Sinduscon, 2003.
DEGANI, C. M.; CARDOSO, F. F. Aplicabilidade de sistemas de gestão ambiental em empresas construtoras de edifícios. Boletim Técnico da Escola Politécnica da USP, Departamento de Engenharia de Construção Civil. EPUSP, 2004.
MARIANO, L.S. Gerenciamento de resíduos da construção civil com reaproveitamento estrutural: Estudo de caso de uma obra com 4000 m2. Curitiba, 2008. Dissertação de mestrado - UFPR, 2008.
MILARÉ, E. Princípios fundamentais do direito do ambiente. Justitia. São Paulo, 59 (181/184). Jan/dez. 1998. Disponível em: http://www.justitia.com.br/revistas/w71d84.pdf. Acesso em: 10 set. 2012.
MONTEIRO, J. H. P. Manual de gerenciamento integrado de resíduos sólidos. Rio de Janeiro: IBAM, 2001.
PINTO, T. P. Gestão ambiental de resíduos da construção civil: a experiência do SindusCon-SP. São Paulo, Obra Limpa: I & T: SindusCon-SP, 2005.
SERRA, S. M. B.; OLIVEIRA, I. L. Análise da Organização de Canteiros de Obras. Anais do XI Encontro Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído, Florianópolis, 2006.
SOUZA, U. E. L.; PALIARI, J. C.; AGOPYAN, V.; ANDRADE, A. C. Diagnóstico e combate à geração de resíduos na produção de obras de construção de edifícios: uma abordagem progressiva. Revista Ambiente Construído, Porto Alegre, v. 4, n. 4, p. 33-46, out./dez. 2004.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
