A bioética e sua reflexibilidade na preservação ambiental e na saúde
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086969Keywords:
Bioethics, Environmental Education, Environment, HealthAbstract
The current system generates economic wealth, but also produces environmental impacts thatreverberate in the ambience and consequently on human health. This is a theoretical andreflective about how bioethics can contribute to the process of environmental preservation withpositive consequences for health. Overcoming the current model of economic progress thatthreatens the stability of the environments and their support systems has become a majorchallenge for humanity, in which bioethics can contribute to the formation of critical readings oninterventions practiced on the environment and on the right of human life and other living beingsthere are in balanced environments. Bioethics can promote reflections to contribute to a moresustainable environment for current and future generations.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Lei nº 6.938, de 31 agosto de 1981. Brasília, 1981. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6938.htm. Acesso em: 29/09/12.
BRASIL. Constituição Federal brasileira, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constitui%C3%A7ao.htm. Acesso em: 25/09/12.
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: meio ambiente, saúde / Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. – Brasília, 1997 pp. Diponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/seb/arquivos/pdf/livro091.pdf. Acesso em: 26/09/12.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Brasília, 2002. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/cartas_promocao.pdf. Acesso em: 20/09/12.
BRASIL, 2004. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. VOCABULARIO BASICO DE RECUSOS NATURAIS E MIO AMBIENTE. 2. EDIÇÃO. Rio de Janeiro 2004. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/vocabulario.pdf. Acesso em: 14/06/12.
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Ministério da Educação. Manual de educação para o Consumo Sustentável. Brasília, 2005 Diponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/dmdocuments/publicacao8.pdf. Acesso em: 20/09/12.
BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE. Brasília, 2006. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/biblioteca/livros/coletanea_miolo.pdf. Acesso em: 20/09/12.
BRASIL. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Subsídios para construção da Política Nacional de Saúde Ambiental / Ministério da Saúde, Conselho Nacional de Saúde. – Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde, 2007. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/biblioteca/livros/subsi_miolo.pdf. Acesso em: 27/09/12.
BRAÑA, G.M.R., GRISÓLIA, C.K. Bio(ética) ambiental: estratégia para enfrentar a vulnerabilidade planetária. Revista Bioética, 2012. Diponível em: http://www.revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/view/714. Acesso em: 29//09/12.
CANDEIAS, NELLY M.F. Conceitos de educação e de promoção em saúde: mudanças individuais e mudanças organizacionais. Rev. Saúde Pública. São Paulo 1997. Diponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89101997000200016. Acesso em: 29/09/12.
FORTES, P.A.C. A bioética em um mundo em transformação. Rev. bioét, 2011. Disponível em: http://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/viewFile/630/657. Acesso em: 20/09/12.
FORTES, P.A.C.; Carvalho,R.R.P;, Tittanegro,G.R.; Pedalini, L.M.; Sacardo,D.P. Bioética e saúde global: um diálogo necessário. Revista Bioética, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/view/742. Acesso em: 27/09/12.
GOMES, D.V. Algumas considerações sobre o desenvolvimento sustentável. Educação ambiental em ação. No. 18 -01/09/2006. Disponível em > http://www.revistaea.org/artigo.php?idartigo=427&class=20. Acesso em: 20/ 09/12.
HECK, J.B.. Bioética: contexto histórico, desafios e responsabilidade. ethic@, Florianópolis, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.cfh.ufsc.br/ethic@/et42art3.pdf. Acesso em: 28/09/12.
JUNQUEIRA, C.R. Bioética: conceito, fundamentação e princípios. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. 2010. Disponivel em: http://www.unasus.unifesp.br/biblioteca_virtual/esf/1/modulo_bioetica/Aula01.pdf. Acesso em: 26/11/12.
SOUZA, J.N.S.; BENEVIDES, R.C.A.; Educação Ambiental Para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável e o Comprometimento das Universidades/Faculdades do Município do Rio de Janeiro, RJ. II Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão e Tecnologia – SEGeT’2005. Disponível em: http://www.aedb.br/seget/artigos05/343_artigo.pdf. Acesso em: 26/09/12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
