Avaliação de desempenho térmico de edificação pública em Cuiabá, MT: estudo de caso
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085433Keywords:
Energy Thermal Performance, Thermal comfort, Energy efficiencyAbstract
Considering the global scenario of scarce natural resources, creating solutions for moreresponsible energy consumption becomes essential. The architectural design appropriate to theclimate minimizes the energy consumption during use of the building. Aiming at reducing theenergy consumption of buildings were developed performance standards and energy efficiency invarious countries. In this context, this study aims at evaluating the thermal performance of apublic building in the city of Cuiabá, MT. To this end, measurements were made on the spotassessment of thermal comfort by the method of Fanger, evaluation of the envelope by RTQ-C.The building had a good thermal performance in their evaluations, staying in the comfort zoneduring all business hours. It is hoped that with this work, Regulation and its application can bebroadcast in the city of Cuiabá, demonstrating its effectiveness and contributing to improvedenergy efficiency of local buildings, especially for public buildings.
Downloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS - NBR 15220-3/2005 – Desempenho Térmico de Edificações (Parte 3: Zoneamento Bioclimático Brasileiro e Diretrizes Construtivas para Habitações Unifamiliares de Interesse Social).
BARBOSA, M. J.; LAMBERTS, R.; GUTHS, S. Uso de barreiras de radiação para minimizar o erro no registro das temperaturas do ar em edificações. Revista Ambiente Construído, Porto Alegre, v. 8, n. 4, p. 117-136, out./dez. 2008.
BERALDO, J. C. Eficiência energética em edifícios: avaliação de uma proposta de regulamento de desempenho térmico para a arquitetura do estado de São Paulo. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006. (Dissertação de Mestrado).
FANGER, P. O. Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental enginneering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). ISO 7730: Moderate Thermal Enviroments - Determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal confort.[S.l], 1984.
KLÜSENER, C. S. Aplicação Do Regulamento Técnico Da Qualidade Para Etiquetagem Do Nível De Eficiência Energética De Edifícios: O Caso Do Centro De Tecnologia Da UFSM. Santa Maria: UFSM, 2009. (Dissertação de Mestrado)
LAMBERTS, R.; DUTRA, L.; PEREIRA, F. O. R. (1997). Eficiência energética na arquitetura. 2 ed. São Paulo: ProLivros, 2004. 192p.
LAMBERTS, R;NARANJO, A. Desempenho Térmico de Edificações. Florianópolis : Apostila – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2011.
LEÃO, E. B. Carta Bioclimática de Cuiabá. 2007.147 f. Dissertação. (Mestrado em Física e Meio Ambiente) -
Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, 2007.
MAGALHÃES, L. C. Orientações gerais para a conservação de energia elétrica em edifícios públicos. PROCEL, 2001.
NAVARINI, F. C., KLOSOWSKI, E. S., TORRES, A. C., ROCKENBACH, E. K., EYNG, C., LIMA M. Avaliação de Diferentes Diâmetros e Materiais para Confecção de Globos Negros para estimativa de índice de conforto térmico em condições de pasto.In: ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNISTAS, 2007, Brasília. Anais eletrônicos …, Brasília: ABZ, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.abz.org.br/publicacoes-tecnicas/anaiszootec/artigoscientificos/bioclimatologia-ambiencia. Acesso em: 4 Mar.2011.
PEREIRA, N.; BOND, T. E.; MORRISON, S. R. Ping-pong ball into black-globe thermometer. Agricultural Engineering, St. Joseph, v.10, n.48, p.341-342, Jun. 1967.
PROCEL - PROGRAMA NACIONAL de CONSERVAÇÃO de ENERGIA ELETRICA Manual para Aplicação dos Regulamentos: RTQ-C e RAC-C. Rio de Janeiro: Procel/Eletrobras, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/eletrobras/etiquetagem/downloads.php. Acesso em:.14/06/2011.
______ Regulamento Técnico da Qualidade para o Nível de Eficiência Energética de Edifícios Comerciais, de Serviços e Públicos (RTQ-C). Rio de Janeiro: Procel/Eletrobras, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/eletrobras/etiquetagem/downloads.php. Acesso em: 14/06/2011.
ROMERO, B. M. A. A arquitetura bioclimática do espaço público. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 2001.
SILVA, J. S. A eficiência do brise-soleil em edifícios públicos de escritórios: estudo de casos no plano piloto de Brasília. Brasília: UNB, 2007. (Dissertação de mestrado)
SOUZA, C.F.; TINÔCO, I.F.R.; BAÊTA, F.C.; FERREIRA, W.P.M.; SILVA, R.S. Avaliação de materiais alternativos para confecção do termômetro de globo. Revista Ciência e Agrotecnologia. Lavras, v.26, n.1, p.157-164, jan./fev., 2002. Disponível em: http://www.editora.ufla.br/site/index.php?id=100&menu=m9. Acesso em: 4 de mar.2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
