Ethnoeducational workshop: an interdisciplinary proposal for socio-environmental awareness in the coastal area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130843899Keywords:
Environment, School, Interdisciplinarity, Agenda 21Abstract
The аmbіеntаl is considered an approach to achieving, selling scopes tо еmрirіс, of state of ambіеntаl law, after all, сіtizenѕ with access to іnfоrmation have better соndіtionѕ оf Act on ѕосіеty, оf articulate their іdеіаѕ and оf Act front aѕ саuѕeѕ оf your interest. Within this context, this work had as main objective demоnѕtrate became the questions ambіеntаіѕ can be an excellent educational tool for Сrhythіса Education in the fundаmеntаl teaching. This research has as methodological line the qualitative research, because it emphasizes the description, the induction, the grounded theory and the study of personal perceptions. The Municipal school Almirante Ernesto de Mourão Sá is part of the public network, and it is possible to count on its space for the realization of the research, besides its location close to the area of study, is one of the schools where the program "School of the Family" acts which allowed the Adherence of the students of this program to the project. It was found that the conceptions produced in the school analyzed focus, primarily, on the resulting environmental problems more closely integrated to a strand of the local environment, based on traditional themes such as noise, waste, Deforestation and air and water pollution, although they do not separate from the realization of actions committed to the broader environmental and social changes.
Downloads
References
ANDREOLI, Cleverson V.; et al. Uma leitura para os temas transversais: ensino fundamental. Serviço Nacional de aprendizagem Rural (SENAR), Curitiba, 2012.
AZEVEDO, P. F. de. Ambiente e direito no limiar da vida. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2015.
BELLIA, Vitor. Introdução à economia do meio ambiente. Brasília: IBAMA, 2016.
BIGLIARI, R.V.; CRUZ, R. G. Currículo escolar, pensamento crítico e educação ambiental. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado de Educação Ambiental. Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. v. 21, p. 332-340, jul/dez de 2011.
BRASIL. Congresso Nacional. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil Promulgada em 5 de outubro de 1988. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2007.
_____. Secretária de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: terceiro e quarto ciclos - temas transversais. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998.
CARVALHO, R. M. Da economia da beleza à beleza da economia. Rio de Janeiro: IPPUR, 1997.
RUSCHEINSKY, A. Educação ambiental: abordagens múltiplas. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2012.
VIZENTIN, Caroline R.; FRANCO, Rosemary C. Meio Ambiente: do conhecimento cotidiano ao científico, metodologia ensino fundamental do 1º ao 5º ano. Curitiba: Base Editorial, 2013.
ZITZKE, Valdir Aquino. Educação Ambiental e ecodesenvolvimento. Revista eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação, v. 9, p.175-188, jul./dez., 2012.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
