Municipal financial incentives visiting environmental protection: analysis of the experience in Ouro Preto, MG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130843592Keywords:
Environmental management, Environmental financial incentive, Environmental management toolAbstract
An important instrument of environmental management in the category of economic instruments is embodied in the so called municipal financial incentives. They aim to stimulate the population to reduce the consumption of natural resources and energy, aiming to minimize local environmental impacts, granting, among other benefits, discounts on the Urban Property Tax (IPTU) for property owners who adopt sustainability actions. environmental. In this context, this study evaluated the participation of the population in the program “Quem Preserva Paga Menos”, established by Complementary Law Nº 113, 27 of December, 2011 in the municipality of Ouro Preto - MG. The work consisted in evaluating through semi-structured interviews the knowledge of such economic-environmental incentive by the Ouropretana population and the participation of local property owners in the interest and use of the municipal environmental incentive. To this end, 200 questionnaires were applied and applications for participation in the Program filed with the Municipal Secretariat of Environment of the Ouro Preto City. (SEMMA-OP) were studied. The survey results showed that although the program has been in operation for more than seven years, about 69% of respondents do not know this type of local financial-environmental incentive, while of the portion that knows the instrument (31%), only 27% participate in the program, seeking to achieve discounts on property tax by adopting sustainable measures involving rainwater harvesting, solar heating systems and photovoltaic power generation and participation in the selective collection of domestic solid waste. The data reveal lack of knowledge of the program because there are mainly weaknesses regarding its dissemination within the population of Ouro Preto.
Downloads
References
AECweb. Incentivos fiscais oferecidos pelo governo estimulam boas práticas construtivas. Disponível em: https://www.aecweb.com.br/cont/m/rev/incentivos-fiscais-oferecidos-pelo-governo-estimulam-boas-praticas-construtivas_12511_10_0. Acesso em: 26 de julho de 2019.
BARBIERI, J. C. Gestão Ambiental Empresarial: conceitos, modelos e instrumentos, 2ª edição. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2007.
CÂMARA MUNICIPAL DE BELO HORIZONTE. Projeto de Lei 179/2017 que institui o Programa de Incentivo à Sustentabilidade Urbana, denominando ' IPTU VERDE", que estabelece o desconto progressivo no IPTU de imóveis que adotarem medidas de redução de impacto ambiental e eficiência energética.
FONSECA, A; PRADO FILHO, J.F. Um esquecido marco no saneamento do Brasil: Os sistemas de águas e esgotos de Ouro Preto (1887-1890). Revista História, Ciência, Saúde, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, v.17, n.1, 2010, p.51-66.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.
GOMES, A. A. Análise dos incentivos financeiros municipais visando a proteção ambiental [manuscrito]: O caso em Ouro Preto/ Amanda Aparecida Gomes, 2018.
IBGE. Censo Demográfico 2010 – Características Gerais da População. Resultados da Amostra. IBGE, 2010. Disponível em: Acesso em: 02 de maio 2019.
IBGE. Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais. Perfil dos municípios brasileiros: 2017 IBGE, Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. - Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2018.
IBGE. Projeção da população do Brasil em 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao/. Acesso em: maio de 2018.
IGA. Desenvolvimento Ambiental de Ouro Preto: microbacia do Ribeirão do Funil. Secretaria do Estado de Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente de Minas Gerais/CETEC. 1995.
LEME, T. N. Governança ambiental no nível municipal. In: Governança ambiental no Brasil: instituições, atores e políticas públicas. Org. Maria Magalhães de Moura. Brasília: Ipea, 2016.
MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Programa Nacional de Capacitação de Gestores Ambientais, Cadernos de Formação: recursos para a gestão ambiental municipal, Vol. 5, Brasília: MMA,
OURO PRETO. Lei Complementar Nº 113. Cria o Programa “Quem preserva paga menos” e modifica o último quadro do Anexo I da Lei nº 535/2009, que institui o Imposto Sobre a Propriedade Territorial e Predial Urbana – IPTU, Ouro Preto, MG, 27 Dezembro 2011.
OURO PRETO. Prefeitura Municipal de Ouro Preto. História de Ouro Preto. Disponível em: http://www.ouropreto.mg.gov.br/historia. Acesso em: 01 julho 2019.
PEREIRA, L.F. Sd. Tributação ambiental e incentivos fiscais. Disponível em: https://drluizfernandopereira.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/341333697/tributacao-ambiental-e-incentivos-fiscais. Acesso em: 27 de maio de 2019.
PIMENTEL, T. Como nos tempos de Vila Rica, há 300 anos esgoto de Ouro Preto ainda é lançado diretamente nos córregos. G1 Minas, Minas Gerais, 16 de ago. de 2019. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/mg/minas-gerais/noticia/2019/08/16/como-nos-tempos-de-vila-rica-ha-300-anos-esgoto-de-ouro-preto-ainda-e-lancado-diretamente-nos-corregos.ghtml. Acesso em: 16 ago. 2019.
PMSB-OP. Plano Municipal de Saneamento Ambiental de Ouro Preto. Volume I. Ouro Preto, 2013.
SOBREIRA, F. Mineração do ouro no período colonial: alterações paisagísticas antrópicas na serra de Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais. Quaternary and Environmental Geosciences, Paraná, v 5, n 1, 2017, p.55-65.
SOBREIRA, F. G.; FONSECA, M. A.. Impactos físicos e sociais de antigas atividades de mineração em Ouro Preto, Brasil. Revista Geotecnia, Lisboa, n° 92. 2001. Disponível em: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/1154/1/ARTIGO_ImpactosF%C3%ADsicosSociais.pdf.Acesso em: 10 mar. 2013.
TEIXEIRA, D. A. Construção e determinação do indicador de salubridade ambiental (ISA/OP) para as áreas urbanas do município de Ouro Preto, MG. 2017. 154 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia ambiental). Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
