Educação ambiental por meio de trilhas ecológicas interpretativas com alunos NEEs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084222Keywords:
Educational processes, Environmental awareness, Recreational activities, Students NeesAbstract
This study aims to improve the interaction of students with Special Educational Needs (Nees), withthe environment, providing their involvement in recreational activities in order to improve their relation with the environment around them. The project was developed at the Municipal School ofSpecial Education Snow White - APAE Erechim / RS from August 2009 to July 2011. We used thetrails as a basic instrument to promote a process of learning and awareness on issues related toenvironment and conservation of natural areas linked to social inclusion. Also sought to createopportunities to experience nature in a better cognitive development. Along the trail self-guided,were focused on different biotic and abiotic factors and their interrelationships in the ecosystem,highlighting the importance of Araucaria forest and riparian vegetation to protect the existingstream in the area. The activities were held in small groups, distributed according to the mentalage of the target audience, and organized with concrete materials. The records of these activities,individuals Nees were in the form of: drawings, paintings, collage, modeling, speaking, singing anddrama. The use of trails as an educational tool for environmental education in APAE Erechim,provided a closer approximation of pupils with Special Educational Needs (Nees) with the naturalenvironment and their own colleagues, thereby contributing to the development of affective andemotional same, allowing the realization of a dynamic environmental education process.Environmental education for a person with some kind of special need have the same goals andshould follow the principles of inclusive education, ie teaching fit the reality of the student,providing him a better understanding of the issues discussed and their relationship with the socialcontext in which they live. You can see that in outdoor activities with the students Nees interactwith the environment in a positive way, because this site are eliminated and the physical barriersof communication. It is concluded that the tracks due to its interdisciplinary nature, allow gainsthe most varied areas of knowledge and it is very important for the formation of students.
Downloads
References
BATISTA, M. W. et al., Inclusão escolar e deficiência mental: análise da interação social entre companheiros. Estudos de Psicologia, Espírito Santo, 2004, 9(1). 101-111.
CARVALHO,I.C.M. 1998. Em direção ao mundo da vida: interdisciplinaridade e educação ambiental. IPÊ – Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas, Brasília, Brasil: 102 p.
DIAS, G. F. Educação Ambiental: princípios e práticas. São Paulo, Gaia, 1992.
DIAS, F. V.; ZANIN, E. M. Eficiência de trilhas interpretativas no Parque Municipal Longines Malinowski, Erechim-RS. Rev. Perspectiva, Erechim, v. 28, p. 29-38, 2004.
GARDNER, H. Inteligências Múltiplas – a teoria na prática. Artmed: Porto Alegre, 1995.
MELLO, N. A; Práticas de Educação Ambiental em Trilhas Ecológicas. Publicação de divulgação do Curso de Ciências Biológicas. UNISC, 2006. Santa Cruz do Sul.
PADUA, S.M.; TABANEZ, M.F. Educação Ambiental Caminhos Trilhados no Brasil. IPÊ, 1997. São Paulo.
TOMAZELLO, M. G. C.; FERREIRA, T. R. C. Educação Ambiental: que critérios adotar para avaliar a adequação pedagógica de seus projetos. Ciência & Educação. Piracicaba, v.7, n.2, 2001.
SIQUEIRA, L. F. Trilhas interpretativas: Uma vertente responsável do (eco) turismo. Caderno Virtual de turismo, nº 14, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.ivtrj.net/caderno/anteriores/14/siqueira/siqueira.pdf. Acesso em: 12/06/2011.
VASCONCELLOS, H. S. R. A pesquisa-ação em projetos de Educação Ambiental. In: PEDRINI, A. G. (org). Educação Ambiental: reflexões e práticas contemporâneas. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1997.
ZANIN, E. M. Projeto trilhas interpretativas - a extensão, o ensino e a pesquisa integrados à conservação ambiental e à educação. Vivências. 1(1):26-35,2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
