A water crisis in Sambito Valley: a perspective of social and environmental development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130840707Keywords:
Water crisis, Socioeconomic development, SocioenvironmentalAbstract
The water crisis in Piaui is one of the factors that most punish the region, affecting several spheres, such as social and economic. Most of the state reservoirs are shallow and in summer times they become water critical, exposing the inhabitants to critical subsistence situations. Hydrogeological studies, however, reveal that Piauí is located on the basin of the largest underground water power in the northeast. This paper aims to analyze the relations that are established in society about the issues of environmental properties related to water resources and their preservation to understand the phenomenon of regional water crisis, for such. The study revealed that climate factors have less influence than political and socio-environmental factors, the population is in need of information regardless of their social status and access to education, while the government in its various spheres is little or not mobilized. Thus, it is expected that with the present work, the scientific, social and political community will awaken to articulate and introduce new habits and practices of resource consumption and their preservation, providing access to the basics of a decent life.
Downloads
References
ABAS – Agência Brasileira de Águas Subterrâneas. Distrito Federal, BR. Águas subterrâneas – minimização das consequências da seca no nordeste. Junho de 2003.
ANA – Agência Nacional de Águas. Superintendência de Planejamento de Recursos Hídricos
– SPR (Brasília, DF). Encarte Sobre a Crise Hídrica – Conjuntura dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil. 2015.
BRASIL. Decreto 17.304 de 07 de agosto de 2017, que dispõe dos municípios em estado de emergência devido à seca. Diário Oficial [do] Estado do Piauí, Poder Executivo.
BRASIL. Decreto-Lei n° 63.778 de 11 de dezembro de 1968, que dispõe sobre a regulamentação da inclusão de municípios no Polígono das Secas. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo.
BRASIL. Lei n° 9.433 de 08 de janeiro de 1997, que dispõe Institui a Política Nacional de Recursos Hídricos, cria o Sistema Nacional de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos, regulamenta o inciso XIX do art. 21 da Constituição Federal, e altera o art. 1º da Lei nº 8.001, de 13 de março de 1990, que modificou a Lei nº 7.990, de 28 de dezembro de 1989. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo.
FURTADO, C. O mito do desenvolvimento econômico. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1973.
CPRM - Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais. Coord. Belo Horizonte, MG. Mickaelon B. Vasconcelos, Carlos Antônio da Luz, Maria Antonieta Alcântara Mourão. Projeto rede integrada de monitoramento das águas subterrâneas: relatório diagnóstico aquífero serra grande, bacia sedimentar do parnaíba. 2012.
DALY, Herman. Sustentabilidade em um mundo lotado. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN BRASIL.
Disponível em: http://www2.uol.com.br/sciam/reportagens/sustentabilidade_em_um_mundo_lotado.html.
FAO. Irrigation practice and water management, irrigation and drainage. Paper 1, 1988.
FEITOSA, F. A. C.; Vidal, C.; Estudos hidrogeológicos de bacias sedimentares da região semiárida do nordeste brasileiro. CPRM-Serviço Geológico do Brasil, Brasília: 2004, pág. 84.
FERREIRA, D. F. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia (UFLA), v. 35, n.6, p. 1039-1042, 2011.
HORN, Geraldo Balduíno; DIEZ, Carmem Lúcia F. Metodologia de pesquisa. Curitiba: IESDE, 2005.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). População e
domicílios em grade estatística. 2010. Disponível em: http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br.
MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO E CULTURA – MEC. Diretrizes curriculares nacionais da educação básica. Brasília: MEC, SEB, DICEI, 562p. 2013.
RAMOS, Graciliano. Vidas secas. 137 ed. Brasil: Record, 2003.
REBOUÇAS, A. C.; Água na região nordeste: desperdício e escassez. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, vol.11, no.29, Jan./Apr. 1997.
SECRETARIA ESTADUAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE E RECURSOS HÍDRICOS - SEMAR.
Plano estadual dos recursos hídricos. Governo Estadual do Piauí, poder executivo: 2010.
VASCONCELOS, M. B; Sousa, N. G; Genaro, D. T; Luz, C. A.; Tupinambá, M. K. F.; Histórico de perfurações de poços tubulares no estado do piauí. Revista de Geologia, Ceará, Vol. 27, n 2, 111 – 126, 2014.
SACHS, I. Rumo à ecossocioeconomia: teoria e prática do desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
