As plantas medicinais como instrumento de educação ambiental

Authors

  • Miguel Antonio Correa Favila Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS
  • Juarez Martins Hoppe Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082805

Keywords:

Environmental education, Medicinal plants, Phytotherapy

Abstract

This study sought to sensitize the students regarding the conservation and use of themedicinal plants as instrument of Environmental, as alternative treatment. Among the obtainedresults, it is pointed out that 47% were confident in the dose of the medicinal plants, reason ofpossible cases of intoxications. And only 8% of the interviewees they just understood that theEnvironmental Education is inserted in the social subject and has as last purpose the quality of lifeof the people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARAÚJO, Luiz E. B. Crise e Direito Ambiental . Revista Direito, Santa Cruz do Sul, n.14, jul./dez., 2000.

CANDAU, Vera M. et al. Tecendo a cidadania; oficinas pedagógicas de direitos humanos. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1995.

CARLINI, E. A Pesquisa com plantas medicinais usadas na medicina popular. Revista Associação Médica Brasileira, v. 29, n. 516, 1983.

CASTRO, H. G, et al. A Dialética do Conhecimento no Uso das Plantas Medicinais. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, Botucatu, Ed. FUNDIBIO, v. 3, n. 2, 2001.

CUNHA, Manuela C. da. Saber Tradicional. Folha de São Paulo, São Paulo, 1 dez. 2001.

DIESEL, Vivien. Educação Ambiental: Um tema démodé? Revista Ciência & Ambiente. Santa Maria: UFSM, n. 8. jan./jun. 1994.

HOSTETTMAN, K., Hamburger, M. Bioactivity in Plants: The link between phytochemistry and Medicine. Phytochemistry, Great Britan, vol. 30, n. 12, 1991.

LAKATOS, Eva Maria. Metodologia Científica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

LEFF, Henrique. O Saber Ambiental: sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder. 1. ed. Petrópolis: vozes, 2001.

____. Epistemologia Ambiental. 2. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.

MATOS, F. J. Abreu. Farmácias Vivas. Fortaleza: Ed. Universidade Federal do Ceará, 2. ed., 1994.

NASCIMENTO, P. C. Plantas que fazem Mal. Jornal da UNICAMP, Campinas, jun. 2001 – Ano XV, n. 163.

NEVES, Mary. C . M. Plantas Medicinais: diagnóstico e gestão. 2. ed., Brasília: IBAMA, 2001.

NOAL, F.O. et al Tendências da Educação Ambiental Brasileira, Santa Cruz do Sul, Ed. EDUNISC, 1 ed., 1998.

SIMÕES, C.M.O. et al Farmacognosia da Planta ao Medicamento. Ed. UFSC, Ed. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Florianópolis/Porto Alegre, 1. ed., 1999.

Downloads

Published

2011-07-11

How to Cite

Favila, M. A. C., & Hoppe, J. M. (2011). As plantas medicinais como instrumento de educação ambiental. Monografias Ambientais, 3(3), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082805

Issue

REMOA, V. 3, N. 3, JUL., 2011

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)