Analysis of the drinkability of water from natural sources, by the municipality of Fraiburgo-SC

Authors

  • Carina Novicki Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe, Caçador, SC
  • Roger Francisco Ferreira de Campos Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe, Caçador, SC https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9064-0383

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819317

Keywords:

Sources, Physico chemical microbiological, Environmental education

Abstract

This work was performed research and analysis of natural sources located in urban and rural Fraiburgo - SC, in order to characterize its drinkability as the parameters established in environmental legislation. The sources were divided into: (1 source) João Maria Grotto, (source 2) Grotto NossaSenhora de Fatima and (source 3) GrottoNossaSenhora de Lourdes, which passed through collections and the following parameters: total coliforms, fecal coliforms, acetate, chloride, nitrite, bromide, nitrite, sulfate, lithium, sodium, ammonium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, color, turbidity, pH, calcium hardness, toughness magnesium, total hardness. The analysis of the sources with color parameters and nitrate was no change in nitrite in 3 sources (source 3), total and fecal coliforms which do not adapt according to CONAMA Resolution 357/2005, Ordinance No. 2914 of the Ministry of Health parameters pH, turbidity, total hardness, sulphate, lithium, sodium, all sources agree with CONAMA Resolution 357/2005, Ordinance No. 2914 of the Ministry of Health for water class 3 parameter in nitrite (source 1) and (source 2) is consistent. We conclude, therefore, that the sources of Fraiburgo - SC are polluted. A plan backed Environmental Education in Law Nº. 9795 of 27 April 1999 will be applied in order to warn about major diseases that may indicate cholera, hepatitis, diarrhea and worms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carina Novicki, Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe, Caçador, SC

Possui graduação em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária pela Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe.

Roger Francisco Ferreira de Campos, Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe, Caçador, SC

É mestrando em Ciências Ambientais pela Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina - UDESC. Possui Pós-Graduação em Docência do Ensino Superior pela Universidade de Blumenal -FURB e é graduado em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe (2014). Atua como Palestrante e Professor do Instituto Cava Viva - ICV e atualmente é Pesquisador da Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe - UNIARP. Tem experiência em Gerenciamento de Resíduos Sólidos, Levantamento Biológico de Basidiomicetos, Saneamento Básico e Recuperação de Áreas Degradadas. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos, Gestão de Recursos Hídricos e Biorremediação.

References

BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Vamos cuidar do Brasil: conceitos e práticas em educação ambiental na escola. Coordenação: Soraia Silva de Mello, Rachel Trajber. Brasília: Ministério da Educação, Coordenação Geral de Educação Ambiental: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Departamento de Educação Ambiental: UNESCO, 2007.

BRASIL. Portaria nº 2.914, de 12 de dezembro de 2011. Dispõe sobre os procedimentos de controle e de vigilância da qualidade da água para consumo humano e seu padrão de potabilidade. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt2914_12_12_2011.html. Acesso em: 12 mai. 2013.

BRISCOE, J.; FEACHEM, R. G.; RAHAMAN, M. M. Avaliação do impacto à saúde no abastecimento de água, saneamento, higiene e educação. Ottawa: InternationalDevelopmentResearch Center, 1986.

CAMPOS, Tiago de Souza et al. Avaliação dos valores de nitrato em águas subterrâneas e sua correlação com atividades antrópicas no município de Águas Lindas de Goiás (2009).Disponível em: http://www.cpgls.ucg.br/ArquivosUpload/1/File/V%20MOSTRA%20DE%20PRODUO%20CIENTIFICA/SAUDE/86.pdf. Acesso em 15 jun. 2013.

COSTA, Odimar Lorini da et al.Análise da qualidade da água de quatro fontes naturais do vale do Taquari/RS (2012). Disponível em: http://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/destaques/article/view/247/204. Acesso em 15 jun. 2013.

CETESB. Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental. Variáveis de qualidade das águas. Disponível em: http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/. Acesso em: 03 jun. 2013.

ROITMAN, I.; TRAVASSOS, R.L; AZEVEDO,J.L. Tratamento de microbiologia. São Paulo: Manole. 1999.

SOUZA, Cezarina Maria Nobre; FREITAS, Carlos Machado de. A produção científica sobre saneamento: uma análise na perspectiva da promoção da saúde e da prevenção de doenças. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. [online]. vol.15, n.1, pp. 65-74, 2010.

ZARSE, K. et al. Captação de lítio em baixa dose promove a longevidade em humanos e metazoários. Jornal Nutrição, (5), p. 387-389, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-12

How to Cite

Novicki, C., & Campos, R. F. F. de. (2016). Analysis of the drinkability of water from natural sources, by the municipality of Fraiburgo-SC. Monografias Ambientais, 15(1), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819317

Issue

REMOA, V. 15, N. 1, JAN.-APR., 2016

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.