Evaluation of Thermal Performance and Energy Efficiency in Housing in Residential Condominium from Cuiabá/MT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813522Keywords:
RTQ-R, Calibration, EnergyPlusAbstract
This article determines the level of thermal performance and energy efficiency of a Cuiabá/MT housing of a residential condominium, located in a region in urban evolution. The study building has 57m ² and consists of walls of precast panels, slab subfloor on grounded soil liner and cover slab of metal frame with ceramic tiles. Measurement periods were 06/28/13 to 07/12/13 (hot dry) and from 12/30/13 to 01/14/14 (hot and humid). To record external and internal data, micrometeorological station and sets HOBO U12-012 with TMC20HD cable and sphere were used. For the evaluation of the thermal performance and energy efficiency was considered the methods of measurement and simplified by NBR15575 and the simulation method by RTQ -R. The EnergyPlus (8.1.0) was used for the thermal energy simulations. The living room has the worst performance and the double room the best. By the measurement method yielded higher levels for the bedroom and home office and intermediary for the living room. The simplified method, the walls had minimum coverage and didn’t meet the criteria. The building got C-level for energy efficiency.Downloads
References
ABNT – ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 15575: Edificações habitacionais – Desempenho. Rio de Janeiro, 2013.
BORGES, C. A. M. O conceito de desempenho de edificações e a sua importância para o setor da construção civil no Brasil. 2008. 263f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia). Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP.
BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO, INDÚSTRIA E COMERCIO EXTERIOR - MDIC. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE METROLOGIA, NORMALIZAÇÃO E QUALIDADE INDUSTRIAL - INMETRO. Portaria nº 18, de 16 de janeiro de 2012. Regulamento Técnico da Qualidade - RTQ para o Nível de Eficiência Energética de Edificações Residenciais. Rio de Janeiro, 2012.
LAMBERTS, R; DUTRA, L; PEREIRA, F. O. R. Eficiência Energética na Arquitetura, PW, São Paulo, 1997.
LAMBERTS, R; GHISI, E; PEREIRA, C. D; BASTISTA, J. O. Casa eficiente: Bioclimatologia e desempenho térmico. Florianópolis:UFSC/LabEEE; 2010, V.1, 123 p.
LEÃO, E. F. T. B. Carta Bioclimática de Cuiabá - Mato Grosso. 2007. 147f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Física e Meio Ambiente). Pós-graduação em Física e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá-MT.
MIRANDA, S. A. Desempenho térmico em dormitórios e consumo de energia elétrica residencial: Estudo de cado em Cuiabá-MT. 2011. 143f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia de Edificações e Ambiental). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Edificações e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá-MT.
MACHADO, F. L. V; MACHADO, M. DE R.; BASTOS, L. G; RIOS, I. DA S. Modelos de Classificações Climáticas: Estudo de Caso no Município de Cuiabá (MT). GEONORTE. 2012. Edição Especial 2. Vol. 2. N 5. p 1455–1467. (ISSN 2237-1419).
SACHS, I. A revolução energética do século XXI. Revista Estudos Avançados. v. 21. n. 59. USP: São Paulo. 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
