Environmental education in educational theory of freire

Authors

  • Claudete da Cruz Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS
  • Cláudia Battestin Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS
  • Gomercindo Ghiggi Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130810983

Keywords:

Environment, Education, Ethics, Paulo Freire

Abstract

The objective of this article is to present the contributions of Freireana Theory of Education to reflect on the training process of teachers and the practice of transversalidade in the area of environmental education. To this end the theoy Education, by Paulo Freire, is used as a frame of reference. Although he didn't write espicifically about the topic - environmental education -, one can find elements in his theory that serve as conceptual tools to look at environmental education in a critical way today.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Claudete da Cruz, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS

Licenciada em Geografia pela UNOESC. Especialista em Educação Ambiental pela UFSM. Mestre em Geografia pela UFSM. Doutoranda em Educação pela UFPel. Integrante do Núcleo de Estudos  Diálogos com Paulo Freire.

Cláudia Battestin, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS

Licenciada em Filosofia pela UNOCHAPECÓ. Especialista em Educação Ambiental pela UFSM. Mestre em Educação e Doutoranda em Educação pela Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Integrante Núcleo de Estudo Diálogos com Paulo Freire.

Gomercindo Ghiggi, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS

Doutor em Educação pela UFRGS (2000). Professor do Programa de Pós Graduação em Educação pela Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel). Coordenador do grupo de estudos Leituras de Paulo Freire. Participa do Grupo de Pesquisa - Filosofia, Educação e Práxis Social e da Linha de Pesquisa: Filosofia e História da Educação do PPGE da UFPel.

References

ARAÚJO, Ulisses F. Temas transversais e a estratégia de projetos. São Paulo: Moderna, 2003.

BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: terceiro e quarto ciclos: apresentação dos temas transversais/Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. – Brasília : MEC/SEF, 1998.

FREIRE, Paulo. A sombra desta Mangueira. 8 ed. São Paulo: Olho d´Água, 2006.

_______. Pedagogia da esperança: um reencontro com a Pedagogia do oprimido. 9. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2002.

_______. Pedagogia da Indignação: Cartas Pedagógicas e outros escritos. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2000.

_______. Pedagogia da Autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa, 30 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1996.

_______. Pedagogia do Oprimido. 8 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1980.

GADOTTI, M. Educação e poder: introdução à pedagogia do conflito. São Paulo: Cortez, 1988.

GEORGEN, Pedro. Pós-modernidade, ética e educação: polêmicas do nosso tempo. Campinas: Autores associados, 2001.

GUTIÉRREZ, Francisco e PRADO, Cruz. Ecopedagogia e cidadania planetária. São Paulo: Instituto Paulo Freire: Cortez, 2002.

GALLO, S. Transversalidade e educação: pensando uma educação não-disciplinar. In ALVES N. & GARCIA, R. L. (Orgs). O sentido da escola. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2014-03-14

How to Cite

Cruz, C. da, Battestin, C., & Ghiggi, G. (2014). Environmental education in educational theory of freire. Monografias Ambientais, 13(2), 3055–3060. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130810983

Issue

REMOA, V. 13, N. 2, MAR., 2014

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.