Learning and teaching through the use of recyclable materials in Childhood Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818752Keywords:
Learning, Playful, Pedagogical practices, Environmental educationAbstract
This paper presents considerations about the pedagogical practices carried out with a class of Childhood Education in the public schools system in the city of Panambi (RS). The overall objective consisted in investigating, describing and analyzing the reflexive records about the playful activities developed in the Childhood Education, highlighting the importance of the interactions and entertainment to learning using pedagogic materials made from waste. The methodology used was the bibliographic research, of field and participating. To draw up this article we sought references on the theorists Wajskop (1995), Santos (2000), Pereira (2006; 2009), Freire (2002), Negrine (1994) and Kishimoto (1998, 2010), among other researchers in the area of solid waste.Downloads
References
ANDRADE, David. Arte Viva. Disponível em:http://www.artenaescola.org.br/sala_relato.php?id_relato=38. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2011.
BASSO, C. M. Algumas Reflexões Sobre o Ensino Mediado Por Computadores. Disponível em: http://www.ufsm.br/lec/02_00/Cintia-L&C4.htm. Acesso em: 26 nov 2011.
BRANDÃO,C. R.Pesquisa Participante.São Paulo, ed. Brasiliense, 2006.
Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Básica. Diretrizes curriculares nacionais para a educação infantil / Secretaria de Educação Básica. – Brasília: MEC, SEB, 2010.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional - nº 9.394/96 Brasília, 1996.
FREIRE, Paulo. A Educação na Cidade. São Paulo, SP: Cortez, 2002.
HEMPE, Cléa. Análise do Gerenciamento dos Resíduos Sólidos em Panambi RS: 1955-2012. Dissertação de Mestrado, 2013. Disponível
em: http://w3.ufsm.br/ppggeo/images/dissertacoes/Dissertao%20Analise%20dos%20Res.Solidos%20.pdf. Acesso em: set. 2014.
JÚNIOR, J.R .Z. Jogo e Ludicidade: Contribuições para o desenvolvimento infantil, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.efdeportes.com/efd137/jogo-e-ludicidade-o-desenvolvimentoinfantil.htm. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2011.
MAURICIO, Juliana. T. Aprender Brincando: O Lúdico na Aprendizagem. Disponível em: www.profala.com/arteducesp140.htm. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2011.
Material didático disponível na disciplina de Metodologia da Pesquisa: Uma Reflexão Sob o Ato de Brincar, disponível em: http://www.profala.com/arteducesp94.htm. Acessado em: 7 jul. 2011.
LAKATOS, E. e MARCONI, M. M . Metodologia do Trabalho Científico. São Paulo, Atlas, 1992.
NEGRINE, Airton. Aprendizagem e desenvolvimento infantil. Porto Alegre: PRODIL, 1994.
OLIVEIRA , E .E.,Nov.2006. Piaget, Vygotsky e Winnicott: relação com jogo infantil e sua aplicação na área da psicopedagogia. Disponível em: http://www.abpp.com.br/artigos/61.htm. Acesso em 28 nov. 2011.
OSTETTO, Luciana Esmeralda(org).Educação Infantil-Saberes e fazeres da formação de professores.Campinas-SP,PAPIRUS,2008.
PASCHOAL, Jaqueline Delgado. (Re)pensando a prática do educador infantil. In SANTOS, Santa Marli Pires dos (Org). Brinquedoteca: a criança, o adulto e o lúdico. Petrópolis, RJ, Vozes, 2000.
PEREIRA. J. E. N. O papel do professor na Educação Infantil na autonomia moral: Uma revisão da literatura, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.artigos.com/artigos/humanas/educacao/opapel-do-professor-na-educacao-infantil-8346/artigo/. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2011.
PEREIRA, Marilda Valerio. O lúdico na educação infantil, 2009. Disponível em: http://blig.ig.com.br/maeducacao/2009/08/30/artigo-o-ludico-na-educacao-infantil/. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2011.
PERRENOUD, Philippe. A prática reflexiva no ofício de professor: profissionalização e razão pedagógica. Porto Alegre: ARTMED, 2002.
SANTOS, Santa Marli Pires. Espaços lúdicos – brinquedoteca. In: SANTOS, Santa Marli Pires. Brinquedoteca– a criança, o adulto e o lúdico. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2000.
KISHIMOTO, Tizuko Morchida (org.). Jogo, brinquedo e a educação. 11ed São Paulo, SP: Cortez, 1998. 1998.
__________. Brinquedos e brincadeiras na educação infantil. Disponível em http://search.sweetim.com/search.asp?src=2&crg=3.1010006&q=mec+brinquedos+e+brincadeiras+na+educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o+infantil+kishimoto. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2011.
WAJSKOP Gisela. Brincar na pré-escola. 3ª edição. São Paulo: Cortez, 1995. Coleção Questões da nossa época, v. 48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.