Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The contribution is original and unpublished, and is not being evaluated by other journal; if not, justify on “Editor’s Comments”.
  • The files for submission are in Microsoft Word format.
  • All the Internet websites (URLs) included on the text (Ex.: http://www.ibict.br) are activated and ready to click.
  • The text follows the style standards and bibliographic requirements described on Direction for Authors, in the “About the Journal” section.
  • The authorship identification of the work was removed from the file and from the Word's “Properties” option, providing this how the Journal's secrecy criteria, if submitted to evaluation by pairs (ex.: articles) according to the available instructions on Ensuring the Evaluation by Blind Pairs.

     

    ******************************************

    Ethical guidelines for journal publication

    The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
    Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

    In particular, 

    Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

    Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

    Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

     

     

Author Guidelines

1. The contribution is original and unpublished, and is not being evaluated by other journals; if not, justify on “Editor’s Comments”. Also, the work is properly based on:

 

EXAMPLE/TEMPLATE

 

FORMAT:

- JUSTIFIED TEXT

- FONT: OPEN SANS 12

- MANDATORY ITEMS:

        -ABSTRACT and KEYWORDS

        -RESUMO, PALAVRAS CHAVES

        -INTRODUCTION

        -FIGURES (300 DPI) AND TABLES ARE PRESENTED ALONG with THE TEXT

        -FOR EQUATIONS, PLEASE USE WORD EDITOR FOR EQUATIONS OR FIGURE WITH HIGH RESOLUTION    

        -MATERIAL AND METHODS

        -RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

        -CONCLUSION

        -ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

- REFERENCES  (ABNT)

 

2. The authors should send the “Declaration of originality and exclusivity” (text is given in the item Copyright Declaration) as a “supplementary document”. It must contain the following information about the authors: full name, email address, and signature.

3. A declaration of English reviewer is necessary (as supplemental doc). The journal has a list of reviewers, which can be indicated.

 

SUBMISSIONS THAT ARE NOT PROPERLY BASED ON THE TEMPLATE OR THAT DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORSHIP DECLARATION SIGNED WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY REJECTED

 

*************************************************************

CITATIONS

Papers in Periodic

Structure:
Authors. Title of the paper. Title of the periodical. Year of publication;Volume(number):Page numbers.

Observations:
• After the publication year, do NOT use spacing.
• Official abbreviations for the title of the periodicals must be used. For national journals that are members of SciELO, this information may be attained on the journal's website, on the "About Us" section. Concerning the abbreviation of international periodicals, the “Index Medicus - abbreviations of journal titles” (http://www2.bg.am.poznan.pl/czasopisma/medicus.php?lang=eng) must be consulted.
• When listing papers with more than six (06) authors, the expression "et al" must be used after the sixth author.

• Standard paper
Vu RL, Helmeste D, AL, Reist C. Rapid determination of venlafaxine and Odesmethylvenlafaxine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection. J. Chromatogr. B. 1997;703(1-2):195–201.

• Volume with suplement
Geraud G, Spierings EL, Keywood C. Tolerability and safety of frovatriptan with short- and long-term use for the treatment of migraine and in comparison with sumatriptan. Headache. 2002;42 Suppl 2:S93-9.

• Number with suplement
Glauser TA. Integrating clinical trial data into clinical practice. Neurology. 2002;58(12 Suppl 7):S6-12.

• Number without volume
Banit DM, Kaufer H, Hartford JM. Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2002;(401):230-8.

• No volume and no number
Outreach: bringing HIV-positive individuals into care. HRSA Careaction. 2002:1-6

• Paper in a language that is not Portuguese, English nor Spanish
Hirayama T, Kobayashi T, Fujita T, Fujino O. [A case of severe mental retardation with blepharophimosis, ptosis, microphthalmia, microcephalus, hypogonadism and short stature-the difference from Ohdo blepharophimosis syndrome]. No To Hattatsu. 2004;36(3):253-7. Japanese.

• Paper without authors data
21st-century heart solution may have a sting in the tail. BMJ. 2002;325(7357):184.

• Paper in electronic periodical 
Santana RF, Santos I. Transcender com a natureza: a espiritualidade para os idosos. Rev. Eletr. Enf. [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2006 jan 12];7(2):148-58. Available from: http://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/revista7_2/original_02.htm.

• Paper accepted for publication, available online
Santana FR, Nakatani AYK, Freitas RAMM, Souza ACS, Bachion MM. Integralidade do cuidado: concepções e práticas de docentes de graduação em enfermagem do estado de Goiás. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [internet]. Forthcoming. [cited 2009 mar 09]. Author’s manuscript available at: http://www.abrasco.org.br/cienciaesaudecoletiva/artigos/artigo_int.php?id_artigo=2494. 
Livros:

• With a single author 
Demo P. Auto-ajuda: uma sociologia da ingenuidade como condição humana. 1st ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2005.

• Organizer, editor or compiler as author 
Brigth MA, editor. Holistic nursing and healing. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 2002.

• Book chapter 
Medeiros M, Munari DB, Bezerra ALQ, Alves MA. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde: implicações éticas. In: Ghilhem D, Zicker F, editors. Ética na pesquisa em saúde: avanços e desafios. Brasília: Letras Livres UnB; 2007. p. 99-118.

• Institution as author 
Secretaria Executiva, Ministério da Saúde. Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS): princípios e conquista. Brasília (Brasil): Ministério da Saúde, 2000. 44 p.

• Book with translator
Stein E. Anorectal and colon diseases: textbook and color atlas of proctology. 1st Engl. ed. Burgdorf WH, translator. Berlin: Springer; c2003. 522 p. 

• Book available online 
Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos; Ministério da Saúde. Por que pesquisa em saúde? Série B. Textos Básicos de Saúde. Série Pesquisa para Saúde: Textos para Tomada de Decisão [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2007 [cited 2009 Mar 09]. Available from: http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/pdf/pq_pesquisa_em_saude.pdf.
Monografia, dissertação e tese 

• Monography
Tonon FL, Silva JMC. O processo de enfermagem e a teoria do autocuidado de Orem no atendimento ao paciente submetido à cirurgia de próstata: implementação de um plano de cuidados individualizado no preparo para a alta hospitalar [monography]. São Carlos: Departamento de Enfermagem/UFSCar; 2005.

• Dissertation 
Coelho MA. Planejamento e execução de atividades de enfermagem em hospital de rede pública de assistência, em Goiânia/GO [dissertation]. Goiânia: Faculdade de Enfermagem/UFG; 2007. 119 p.

• Thesis
Souza ACS. Risco biológico e biossegurança no cotidiano de enfermeiros e auxiliares de enfermagem [thesis]. Ribeirão Preto: Escola de Enfermagem/USP; 2001. 65 p.
Trabalhos em eventos científicos 

• Conference proceedings 
Munari DB, Medeiros M, Bezerra ALQ, Rosso, CFW. The group facilitating interpersonal competence development: a brazilian experience of mental health teaching. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Group Psychotherapy [CD-ROM]; 2006 jul 17-21; São Paulo, Brasil. p. 135-6.
Rice AS, Farquhar-Smith WP, Bridges D, Brooks JW. Canabinoids and pain. In: Dostorovsky JO, Carr DB, Koltzenburg M, editors. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Pain; 2002 Aug 17-22; San Diego, CA. Seattle (WA): IASP Press; c2003. p. 437-68. 

• Conference Proceedings available online 
Centa ML, Oberhofer PR, Chammas J. A comunicação entre a puérpera e o profissional de saúde. In: Anais do 8º Simpósio Brasileiro de Comunicação em Enfermagem [Internet]; 2002 Maio 02-03; São Paulo, Brasil. 2002 [cited 2008 dec 31]. Available from: http://www.proceedings.scielo.br/pdf/sibracen/n8v1/v1a060.pdf.

• Work presented on scientific event
Robazzi MLCC, Carvalho EC, Marziale MHP. Nursing care and attention for children victims of occupational accident. Conference and Exhibition Guide of the 3rd International Conference of the Global Network of WHO Collaborating Centers for Nursing & Midwifery; 2000 July 25-28; Manchester; UK. Geneva: WHO; 2000.
Outras publicações 

• Journals
Souza H, Pereira JLP. O orçamento da criança. Folha de São Paulo. 1995 maio 02; Opinião: 1º Caderno.

• Paper form internet Journal
Deus J. Pacto visa o fortalecimento do SUS em todo estado de Mato Grosso. Diário de Cuiabá [Internet]. 2006 Apr 25 [cited 2009 feb 16]. Saúde. Available from: http://www.diariodecuiaba.com.br/detalhe.php?cod=251738.

• Laws/ordinances 
Ministério da Saúde; Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução Nº 196/96 – Normas regulamentadoras de pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília (Brasil): Ministério da Saúde; 1996.
Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Resolução COFEN-311/2007. Aprova a Reformulação do Código de Ética dos Profissionais de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro (Brasil): COFEN; 2007.

• Online database
Shah PS, Aliwalas LI, Shah V. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. 2006 Jul 19 [cited 2009 mar 02]. In: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. c1999 – . Available from: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD004950/frame.html Record No.: CD004950. 

• Text from a website
Carvalho G. Pactos do SUS – 2005 – Comentários Preliminares [Internet]. Campinas: Instituto de Direito Sanitário Aplicado; 2005 Nov 15 [cited 2009 mar 11]. Available from: http://www.idisa.org.br/site/artigos/visualiza_conteudo1.php?id=1638 

• Publication on the Union Official Diary
Lei N. 8.842 de 4 de janeiro de 1994. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Idoso, cria o Conselho Nacional do Idoso e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União (Brasília). 1994 Jan 05.

• Internet Homepage
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão (BR) [cited 2009 feb 27]. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios. Síntese de Indicadores 2005. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/trabalhoerendimento/pnad2005/default.shtm 
DATASUS [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde (BR) [cited 2006 oct 20]. Departamento de Informática do SUS – DATASUS. Available from: http://w3.datasus.gov.br/datasus/datasus.php.
Para mais informações sobre as referencias consulte International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Sample References: (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html), ou ainda, consulte o site Citing Medicine (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=citmed.TOC&depth=2).

 

***************************************************************

EDUCATION, SOCIETY AND CULTURE

Determine the set of knowledges that aim the scientific understanding of thecnical, historical or social aspects. Hence, stablishing relationships and enlightning their bonds in order to evaluate its results.

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Knowledge on the thecnical area. Both areas (Education, Society and Culture and Environmental Issues) put efforts together in order to create another area.

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

Aims the determination of a inherently multidisciplinary work.

Privacy Statement

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.