Effect of the national business system on the disclosure of greenhouse gases emissions: multi-country evidence
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465985308Mots-clés :
National business system, Institutional environment, Greenhouse gasesRésumé
Methodology: Institutional Theory and the National Business System approach were used to propose the research hypotheses. The work evaluated 1,072 companies from the 10 largest economies in the world, using econometric models and statistical analysis.
Purpose: Investigate the effect of the national business system on the disclosure of greenhouse gases by companies from the largest economies in the world.
Findings: The results indicate that institutional factors, such as the political, financial and cultural systems affect the disclosure of greenhouse gases. Thus, institutional pressure from countries can determine the environmental performance of their firms. However, the results showed that the country’s level of development is not an explanatory variable for the disclosure of atmospheric emissions.
Practical implications: The research presents the impact of formal and informal institutions on the disclosure practices of companies, suggesting that policy makers could influence it by strengthening certain institutional aspects.
Originality/Value: Although there is an increasing volume of research on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility, few studies are dedicated to comparing the disclosure of greenhouse gases in the light of the national business system.
Téléchargements
Références
Amor-Esteban, V., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Galindo-Villardón, M. P. (2018). Analysing the Effect of Legal System on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at the Country Level, from a Multivariate Perspective. Social Indicators Research, 140(1), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1782-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1782-2
Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465714
Barkemeyer, R., Preuss, L., & Ohana, M. (2018). Developing country firms and the challenge of corruption: Do company commitments mirror the quality of national-level institutions? Journal of Business Research, 90(May), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.025
Bhaskaran, R. K. (2023). Sustainability Initiatives, Knowledge-Intensive Innovators, and Firms’ Performance: An Empirical Examination. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11010014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11010014
Belal, A. R. (2000). Environmental reporting in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Eco-Management and Auditing, 7(3), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0925(200009)7:3<114::aid-ema131>3.0.co;2-e DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0925(200009)7:3<114::AID-EMA131>3.0.CO;2-E
Brown, D., & Knudsen, J. S. (2015). Domestic Institutions and Market Pressures as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility: Company Initiatives in Denmark and the UK. Political Studies, 63(1), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12092
Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285172
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
Choi, B., & Luo, L. (2020). Does the market value greenhouse gas emissions? Evidence from multi-country firm data. British Accounting Review, 53(1), 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100909
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2018). Does institutional context affect CSR disclosure? A study on Eurostoxx 50. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082823
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2016a). Impact of the Institutional Macro Context on the Voluntary Disclosure of CSR Information. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004
Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2016b). Impact of the Institutional Macro Context on the Voluntary Disclosure of CSR Information. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004
García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2013). The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review, 22(5), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.007
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business and Society, 39(3), 254–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900302
He, R., Luo, L., Shamsuddin, A., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate carbon accounting: A literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12789
Hofstede, G. (1983). The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance the role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26
Islam, A. M., & Deegan, C. (2008). Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(6), 850–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810893272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810893272
Jensen, J. C., & Berg, N. (2012). Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(5), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.740
Kaya, I. (2016). The Mandatory Social and Environmental Reporting: Evidence from France. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.130
Kouloukoui, D., Marinho, M. M. de O., Gomes, S. M. da S., de Jong, P., Kiperstok, A., & Torres, E. A. (2019). The impact of the board of directors on business climate change management: Case of Brazilian companies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09864-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09864-7
Langseth, P., Stapenhurst, R., & Pope, J. (1997). The role of a national integrity system in fighting corruption. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 23(1–2), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.1997.9986471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.1997.9986471
Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2023). Understanding ESG scores and firm performance: Are high-performing firms E, S, and G-balanced?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122779
Li, K., Khalili, N. R., & Cheng, W. (2019). Corporate social responsibility practices in China: Trends, context, and impact on company performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020354
Lourenço, I. C., & Branco, M. C. (2013). Determinants of corporate sustainability performance in emerging markets: The Brazilian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.013
Luo, L. (2019). The influence of institutional contexts on the relationship between voluntary carbon disclosure and carbon emission performance. Accounting and Finance, 59(2), 1235–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12267
Luo, L., Lan, Y. C., & Tang, Q. (2012). Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 23(2), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646X.2012.01055.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646X.2012.01055.x
Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y.-C. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries. Accounting Research Journal, 26(1), 6–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2012-0024
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Freepress.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Miles-Novelo, A., & Anderson, C. A. (2019). Climate Change and Psychology: Effects of Rapid Global Warming on Violence and Aggression. Current Climate Change Reports, 5(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00121-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-019-00121-2
Miniaoui, Z., Chibani, F., & Hussainey, K. (2019a). The impact of country-level institutional differences on corporate social responsibility disclosure engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1748
Miniaoui, Z., Chibani, F., & Hussainey, K. (2019b). The impact of country-level institutional differences on corporate social responsibility disclosure engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1748
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0570608400000867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97
Oliveira, M., Rodrigues Júnior, M., Lima, S., & de Freitas, G. (2018). The Influence of the Characteristics of the National Business System in the Disclosure of Gender-Related Corporate Social Responsibility Practices. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020014
Pinheiro, A. B., Batistella, A. J., Chagas, A. C. C., & Carraro, W. W. H. (2020). Relations between institutional environment and level of social disclosure in the banking sector: Evidence from Latin America. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 11(3), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v11i3.1113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v11i3.1113
Pinheiro, A. B., da Silva Filho, J. C. L., & Moreira, M. Z. (2021). Institutional drivers for corporate social responsibility in the utilities sector. Revista de Gestão, 28(3), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/rege-08-2019-0088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-08-2019-0088
Pinheiro, A. B., dos Santos, J. I. A. S., Cherobim, A. P. M. S., & Segatto, A. P. (2023). What drives environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance? The role of institutional quality. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2023-0091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2023-0091
Pinheiro, A. B., Sampaio, T. S. L., Batistella, A. J., & Carraro, W. W. H. (2021). Efeito da Representação Feminina na Divulgação de Responsabilidade Social Corporativa: Análise Internacional do Setor Energético. Internext, 16(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i2.629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i2.629
Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2019). Corporate Environmental Disclosure Practices in Different National Contexts: The Influence of Cultural Dimensions. Organization and Environment, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619860263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619860263
Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Bel-Oms, I. (2019). Board structures, liberal countries, and developed market economies. Do they matter in environmental reporting? An international outlook. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 710–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2275
Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Bel‐Oms, I. (2019). Varieties of capitalism, corporate governance mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement: An overview of coordinated and liberal market economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1840
Raftery, A. E., Zimmer, A., Frierson, D. M. W., Startz, R., & Liu, P. (2017). Less than 2 °c warming by 2100 unlikely. Nature Climate Change, 7(9), 637–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3352
Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019). Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107
Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. (1991). Organizational Environments and the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278953
Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, M. P. B. (2013). Metodologia de pesquisa (5a edição). Penso.
Scott. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
Scott, W. R. (1987). The Adolescence of Theory Institutional. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392880
Soares, R. A., Abreu, M. C. S. de, Rebouças, S. M. D. P., & Marino, P. de B. L. P. (2020). The effect of national business systems on social and environmental disclosure: A comparison between Brazil and Canada. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 22(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i1.4042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i1.4042
Soares, R. A., Pinheiro, A. B., Abreu, M. C. S. de, & Marino, P. D. B. L. P. (2018). Efeito do sistema financeiro na evidenciação socioambiental de empresas em países emergentes e desenvolvidos. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 37(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v37i2.34035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v37i2.34035
Stankov, L. (2015). Four GLOBE dimensions of perceived social norms in 33 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.005
Tilt, C. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility research: The importance of context. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0003-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0003-7
Walker, K., Zhang, Z., & Ni, N. (Nina). (2019). The Mirror Effect: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Firm Performance in Coordinated Market Economies and Liberal Market Economies. British Journal of Management, 30(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12271
Whitley, R. (1998). Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: The limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems. In Review of International Political Economy (Vol. 5, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347480
Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950017000310509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198293965.001.0001
Whitley, R. (2003). How national are business systems? The role of different State types and complementary institutions in constructing homogenous systems of economic coordination and control. National Business Systems in the New Global Context, 1(May), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.13.1.443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.13.1.443
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Revista de Administração da UFSM 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
