Eficiência de mercado: uma aplicação no setor sucroalcooleiro da Paraíba
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465939181Mots-clés :
Eficiência de Mercado, Cointegração, Setor Sucroalcooleiro.Résumé
Objetivo – Este artigo tem como principal objetivo analisar a eficiência do mercado de açúcar e etanol da Paraíba, mediante o teste de cointegração.
Design/metodologia/abordagem – Para tanto, utilizaram-se séries históricas do açúcar e etanol do mercado paraibano, coletados na BM&FBOVESPA e na CEPEA. Quanto aos métodos, aplicaram-se as métricas de Estatísticas Descritiva para descrever os comportamentos das séries, o Teste Raiz Unitária Aumentado de Dickey-Fuller para verificar a estacionariedade, e por fim o Teste de Cointegração, para analisar a relação a longo prazo.
Resultados – Os resultados indicaram um comportamento com diversos movimentos oscilatórios nos preços das séries. Quanto a estacionariedade das séries, as variáveis à vista e futuro do mercado paraibano, apresentou-se processo não estacionário. Por fim, as séries estimaram-se que não há cointegração. Podendo assim, concluir que o setor sucroalcooleiro do mercado paraibano é ineficiente, ou seja, as commodities desviar o valor real de mercado.
Implicações/limitações da pesquisa – No desdobramento desta pesquisa, ficou evidente uma limitação no decorrer da fase exploratória, como: Restrições no período dos dados do açúcar e etanol hidratado disponíveis na CEPEA e BM&FBOVESPA, principalmente no que se refere as variáveis de preço à vista e futuro do mercado paraibano.
Implicações práticas – Nesta pesquisa, podem-se constatar que o mercado paraibano seria considerado eficiente se refletisse as informações disponíveis nos preços das commodities, impossibilitando ganhos anormais.
Originalidade/valor – Estudo sobre eficiência de mercado é relevante, pois possibilita identificar padrões de comportamento dos preços de ativos no mercado. Isto é, podem avaliar se os preços dos ativos sendo supervalorizadas e como isso afeta o investidor e a economia brasileira.
Téléchargements
Références
Alves, J., Duarte, G. & Lima, R. (2008). Efficiency Test of the Future Market for Anhydrous Alcohol in Brazil: an analysis of co-integration. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, v.39, n.1.
Amado, C. & Carmona, C. (2004). Analysis of the Efficiency of Brazilian Agricultural Futures Markets: an analysis of the efficiency of Brazilian agricultural futures markets. IV Brazilian Finance Meeting, Anais, Rio de Janeiro: Federal University of Ceará, v.4, p.1-16.
Aráujo, A., Lobato, T., Carvalho, B. & Sousa, I. (2018). The Market Efficiency Hypothesis: the case of coffee in Brazil's future market. Gestão e Desenvolvimento magazine, v.4, n.1, p. 87-96.
Bachelier, L. (1900). Theorie de la speculation. t. i. Reprinted in English, Ed. A. J. Bones, Random character of stock market prices, p.17-78.
Bitencourt, W. (2007). Empirical essays on the efficiency of the future coffee market. Dissertation (Master in Administration) - Federal University of Lavras.
Commodities and Futures Exchange [BM&FBOVESPA], (2018). Financially Cleared Crystal Sugar Future. Accessed on 25 of 10, 2018, available on the Commodities and Futures Exchange - BM & FBOVESPA: <http://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/produtos-e-servicos/negociacao/commodities/futuro-de-acucar-cristal -with-liquidation-financial.htm>
Bueno, R. (2011).Time Series Econometrics, Vol. 2. São Paulo: CENGAG Learning.
Brealey, R.A . & Myers, S.C. (1995). Principles of business finance. 3rd ed. Lisbon: McGraw-hill, p. 924.
Center for Advanced Studies in Applied Economics [CEPEA / ESALQ] (2018). Monthly methodology for cepea / esalq paraíba sugar in the domestic market. Accessed on: October 25, 2018. Available at the Center for Advanced Studies in Applied Economics - CEPEA / ASALQ: <https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/br/metodologia/metodologia-mensal-acucar-cepea- esalq-paraiba-mercado-interno.aspx>
National Supply Company [CONAB] (2018). Follow-up of the Brazilian Sugarcane Harvest / v.4 - Harvest 2017/2018, 2018. Accessed on: October 25, 2018. Available at Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento, Brasília: <https://www.conab.gov .br / conteudos.php? A = 1253 &>
National Supply Company [CONAB] (2016). Monitoring of the Brazilian Sugarcane Harvest / v.4 - Harvest 2014/2015, 2016, Accessed on: October 25, 2018. Available at Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento, Brasília:
Cowles, A. (1933). Can Stock Market Forecaster Forecast? In Econometrica, v. 1, n.3, p.309-224.
Davis, M. & Etheridge, A. (2006). Theory of Speculation: The origins of Modern Finance. Harcover.
Damodaran, A. (1996). Investment evaluation: tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. São Paulo: Qualitmark, p.630.
Dickey, D. & Fuller, W. (1981). A likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometric, v. 49, p.1057-1072.
Domingues, J.M.F. (2014). Market efficiency hypothesis in the weak form of the cryptodivine market. (Master in Economics) Faculty of Economics - University of Coimbra.
Elton, E. J. & GRuber, M. J.(1995) Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. New York: John Whiley & Sons Inc.
Engle, R. F. & Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrics, Chicago, v.55, n.2, pg. 251-76.
Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, p.385-417.
Fraga, G., & Silva Neto, W. (2011). Evidence in the Commodity Futures Market: Empirical Evidence, v.42, n.1.
Harzer, J., Costa, C.T., Silva, W.V. & Souza A. (2012). Efficiency of the Agricultural Commodity Futures Market by Appliying the Cointegration test. ReA - UFSM, v.5, n.2, p.336-353.
Hull, J. (2016). Option, Futures, and Other Derivatives. Bookman, 9th ed.
Jensen, M. (1978). Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, n.6, p. 95-102.
Johansen, S.(1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 213-245.
Johansen, S. & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v.52, n.2, p.169-209.
Kendall, M. (1953). The analysis of economic time - series, part I. Prices. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, v.96, p.11-25.
Alves, J., Duarte, G. & Lima, R. (2008). Efficiency Test of the Future Market for Anhydrous Alcohol in Brazil: an analysis of co-integration. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, v.39, n.1.
Amado, C. & Carmona, C. (2004). Analysis of the Efficiency of Brazilian Agricultural Futures Markets: an analysis of the efficiency of Brazilian agricultural futures markets. IV Brazilian Finance Meeting, Anais, Rio de Janeiro: Federal University of Ceará, v.4, p.1-16.
Aráujo, A., Lobato, T., Carvalho, B. & Sousa, I. (2018). The Market Efficiency Hypothesis: the case of coffee in Brazil's future market. Gestão e Desenvolvimento magazine, v.4, n.1, p. 87-96.
Bachelier, L. (1900). Theorie de la speculation. t. i. Reprinted in English, Ed. A. J. Bones, Random character of stock market prices, p.17-78.
Bitencourt, W. (2007). Empirical essays on the efficiency of the future coffee market. Dissertation (Master in Administration) - Federal University of Lavras.
Commodities and Futures Exchange [BM&FBOVESPA], (2018). Financially Cleared Crystal Sugar Future. Accessed on 25 of 10, 2018, available on the Commodities and Futures Exchange - BM & FBOVESPA: <http://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/produtos-e-servicos/negociacao/commodities/futuro-de-acucar-cristal -with-liquidation-financial.htm>
Bueno, R. (2011).Time Series Econometrics, Vol. 2. São Paulo: CENGAG Learning.
Brealey, R.A . & Myers, S.C. (1995). Principles of business finance. 3rd ed. Lisbon: McGraw-hill, p. 924.
Center for Advanced Studies in Applied Economics [CEPEA / ESALQ] (2018). Monthly methodology for cepea / esalq paraíba sugar in the domestic market. Accessed on: October 25, 2018. Available at the Center for Advanced Studies in Applied Economics - CEPEA / ASALQ: <https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/br/metodologia/metodologia-mensal-acucar-cepea- esalq-paraiba-mercado-interno.aspx>
National Supply Company [CONAB] (2018). Follow-up of the Brazilian Sugarcane Harvest / v.4 - Harvest 2017/2018, 2018. Accessed on: October 25, 2018. Available at Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento, Brasília: <https://www.conab.gov .br / conteudos.php? A = 1253 &>
National Supply Company [CONAB] (2016). Monitoring of the Brazilian Sugarcane Harvest / v.4 - Harvest 2014/2015, 2016, Accessed on: October 25, 2018. Available at Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento, Brasília:
Cowles, A. (1933). Can Stock Market Forecaster Forecast? In Econometrica, v. 1, n.3, p.309-224.
Davis, M. & Etheridge, A. (2006). Theory of Speculation: The origins of Modern Finance. Harcover.
Damodaran, A. (1996). Investment evaluation: tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. São Paulo: Qualitmark, p.630.
Dickey, D. & Fuller, W. (1981). A likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometric, v. 49, p.1057-1072.
Domingues, J.M.F. (2014). Market efficiency hypothesis in the weak form of the cryptodivine market. (Master in Economics) Faculty of Economics - University of Coimbra.
Elton, E. J. & GRuber, M. J.(1995) Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. New York: John Whiley & Sons Inc.
Engle, R. F. & Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrics, Chicago, v.55, n.2, pg. 251-76.
Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, p.385-417.
Fraga, G., & Silva Neto, W. (2011). Evidence in the Commodity Futures Market: Empirical Evidence, v.42, n.1.
Harzer, J., Costa, C.T., Silva, W.V. & Souza A. (2012). Efficiency of the Agricultural Commodity Futures Market by Appliying the Cointegration test. ReA - UFSM, v.5, n.2, p.336-353.
Hull, J. (2016). Option, Futures, and Other Derivatives. Bookman, 9th ed.
Jensen, M. (1978). Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, n.6, p. 95-102.
Johansen, S.(1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 213-245.
Johansen, S. & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v.52, n.2, p.169-209.
Kendall, M. (1953). The analysis of economic time - series, part I. Prices. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, v.96, p.11-25.
Lai, K.S. & Lai, M. (1991). The Cointegration Test for Market Efficiency. The Journal of Futures Markets, vol.11, no.5, 567-575.
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business, v.36, p. 394-419.
Melo, A., Lima, R. & Moraes, A. (2009). Analysis of the efficiency of the Brazilian future market for live cattle using co-integration. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v.47, n.03, p.601-614.
Michelin, F. P., Silva, F.M. & Ruppenthal, J. E. (2012). Applied Social Sciences in Magazine - UNIOESTE / MCR - v. 12 - n. 22, p. 89 to 105.
Morais, I., Stona, F. & Schuck, F. (1959). Applied Econometrics in EViews. Porto Alegre. 2016.OSBORNE, M. F. Maury Brownian motion in the stock market. Operations Research, v.7, n.2, p.145- 176.
Oliveira Neto, O.J. & Garcia, F. G. (2013). Efficiency of the future market for Brazilian beef cattle, Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administração, vol. 26, n. 02.
Rodrigues, M. & Martines Filho, J. (2015). Efficiency in the future agricultural markets in Brazil. Revista Economia Aplicada, v.19, n.2, p.349-368.
Roberts, H. V. (1959). Stock market “patterns” and financial analysis: methodological suggestions. The Journal of Finance, The American Finance Association, v.14, n.1, p.1-10.
Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W. & Jaffe, J.F. (2009). Corporate Finance. 2nd ed. Atlas, São Paulo, p.778.
Salles, À. (2010). Class Notes - Regression Analysis. Rio de Janeiro: Polytechnic School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
Samuelson, P. A. (1965). Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review, Cambridge, Vol. 6, p. 41-49.
Silva, R. & Takeuchi, R. (2010). Future and cash sugar markets: an empirical analysis of efficiency through arbitration. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, Piracicaba, SP, v.48, n.2, p.307-330.
Silva Neto, W., Fraga, G., & Marques, P. (2010) Market efficiency: empirical evidence for sport prices and the future of live cattle. Revista Economia, v.36, n.3, p.7-24.
Tonin, J., Parré, J. & Tonin, J. (2014). Analysis of cointegration, effectiveness and optimal hedge ratio for the Brazilian and North American ethanol market. Brazilian Society of Economy, Administration and Rural Sociology.
União da Indústria de Cana-de-Açúcar [UNICA], (2018). Accessed on November 4, 2018. Available in Milling of sugarcane and sugar and ethanol production - 2017/2018 harvest:
WORKING, H. (1934). A random difference series for use in the analysis of time series. Journal of American Statistical Association, v.18, No. 137, p. 29: 11-24.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Revista de Administração da UFSM 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
