McDonaldization and technology: the control and rationalization of contemporary lifestyles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465990769Schlagworte:
McDonaldization, Control, Technology, Rationalization, Society of ControlAbstract
Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between McDonaldization and technology, analyzing how the extreme rationalization of social processes, driven by Information Technologies, shapes contemporary lifestyles, organizations, and social interactions. The central objective is to understand whether digital McDonaldization structurally transforms human interactions and institutional functioning by reinforcing efficiency, predictability, control, and calculability.
Design/methodology/approach: This qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive research is based on discourse analysis from five interviewees working in different economic sectors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and their narratives were analyzed according to the principles of McDonaldization proposed by Ritzer (2021). Discourse analysis followed Foucault’s (2014) approach, exploring internal and external discursive procedures that legitimize or challenge digital rationalization.
Findings: Digital McDonaldization structures work and consumption, promoting efficiency and convenience but also reducing individual autonomy and imposing invisible control mechanisms mediated by algorithms and predictive systems.
Research limitations/implications: The study includes a limited number of interviewees, restricting the generalization of results. Future research may adopt mixed methods to expand the analysis.
Practical implications: The findings highlight the need to balance efficiency and flexibility in organizational models to prevent the dehumanization of labor and consumption relations.
Social implications: The study reveals how digital rationalization affects subjectivity and reinforces algorithmic control over individual choices.
Originality/value: This study contributes to the debate on McDonaldization and technology by expanding the understanding of digital rationalization and its effects on contemporary society.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2014). Vigilância líquida. Editora Zahar.
Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1-13.
Brasil. (2012). Resolução CNS 466/12: Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Conselho Nacional de Saúde.
Bruno, F., Cardoso, B., & Kanashiro, M. (2018). Tecnopolíticas da vigilância: Perspectivas da margem. Boitempo.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Foucault, M. (2019). Microfísica do poder. Paz & Terra.
Foucault, M. (2014). Vigiar e Punir: O nascimento da prisão. Editora Vozes.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage Publications.
Gadonski, J. (2023). Tecnologia e sociedade: McDonaldização como expressão de modos de vida contemporâneos. Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Farroupilha. Disponível em: https://arandu.iffarroupilha.edu.br/handle/itemid/493.
Gershon, I. (2019). Down and out in the new economy: How people find (or don’t find) work today. University of Chicago Press.
Han, B.-C. (2015). A sociedade do cansaço. Vozes.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2001). Império. Editora Record.
Hassan, R. (2020). The Condition of Digitality: A Post-Modern Marxism for the Practice of Digital Life. University of Westminster Press.
Lash, S. (2007). Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation? Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 55-78.
Raval, N., & Dourish, P. (2016). Standing out from the crowd: Emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 97-108.
Ritzer, G. (2021). The McDonaldization of society: Into the digital age. Sage Publications.
Rocha, R. S. (2022). Sociedade disciplinar e sociedade de controle: Implicações políticas, sociais e culturais na contemporaneidade digital. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade.
Sennett, R. (2006). A cultura do novo capitalismo. Record.
Slee, T. (2016). What’s yours is mine: Against the sharing economy. OR Books. Vergara, S. C. (2016). Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração (16ª ed.). Atlas.
Taylor, F. W. (1995). Princípios de administração científica (3ª ed.). Atlas.
Weber, M. (2020). A ética protestante e o espírito do capitalismo. Vozes.
Wood Junior, T. (1992). Fordismo, toyotismo e volvismo: Os caminhos da indústria em busca do tempo perdido. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 32(4), 6-18.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2026 Jaderson Gadonski, Pedro Henrique de Gois, Ana Claudia da Rosa, Debora Bobsin, Ketlen Pinto da Silva Fonseca
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
Until 2023, copyright was transferred by the authors to ReA/UFSM. As of 2024, the authors of articles published by the journal retain the copyright to their work. ReA/UFSM operates under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted reuse and distribution of articles, provided the original work is properly cited.
