Maturidade em inovação sustentável e em responsabilidade social corporativa: implicações no desempenho empresarial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465938666Schlagworte:
Maturidade em Inovação Sustentável, Maturidade em Responsabilidade Social Corporativa, Estratégia, Desempenho.Abstract
A Inovação Sustentável está estrategicamente associada a Responsabilidade Social Corporativa (RSC), integrando, de forma conjunta e integrada, as dimensões econômica, social e ambiental. Como forma de verificar essa associação e suas implicações no desempenho empresarial (DE), os modelos de Maturidade em Inovação Sustentável (MIS) e em RSC (MRSC) permitem identificar como as empresas estão evoluídas em determinada área e, a partir daí, possam criar valor aos negócios e obterem vantagem competitiva em relação aos concorrentes. Este estudo verifica a influência da MIS na MRSC e o efeito mediador da MRSC na relação entre MIS e o DE, à luz da Teoria Baseada em Recursos (TBR). A análise se baseou na Modelagem de Equações Estruturais (MEE), considerando uma amostra de 58 empresas sediadas na região amazônica. Os resultados indicam uma forte relação entre a MIS e a MRSC, que a MRSC influencia positivamente o DE e que a MRSC exerce um efeito mediador positivo na relação entre a MIS e o DE. Esses resultados permitem um avanço nos estudos sobre estratégia ao oportunizar mecanismos para gerenciamento das práticas relacionadas a sustentabilidade, como possíveis fontes para análise da geração de valor e promoção de vantagens competitivas para as empresas.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
ASHFORD, N. A.; HALL, R. P. The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, v. 3, p. 270-292, 2011.
ATKINSON, G.; NEVILL, A. M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med, v. 26, n. 4, p. 217-238, 1998.
BACINELLO, E.; TONTINI, G. Relationship between Maturity in Sustainable Innovation and Business Performance. Rev. Adm. UFSM, v. 11, ed. Especial Engema, p. 843-857, 2018.
BANSAL, P. “Evolving Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development”. Strategic Management Journal, v. 26, p. 197–218, 2005.
BARBIERI, J. C.; VASCONCELOS, I. F. G.; ANDREASSI, T.; VASCONCELOS, F. C. Inovação e Sustentabilidade: Novos Modelos e Proposições. RAE - São Paulo, v. 50, n. 2, p. 146-154, 2010.
BARNEY, J. B. Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n.1, p. 99-120, 1991.
______ HESTERLY, W. S. Administração Estratégica e Vantagem Competitiva: casos brasileiros. São Paulo: Pearson, 2007.
BAUMGARTNER, R. J.; EBNER, D. Corporate Sustainability Strategies: Sustainability Profiles and Maturity Levels. Sustainable Development, v. 18, p. 76–89, 2010.
BOONS, F.; MONTALVO, C.; QUIST, J.; WAGNER, M. Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 45, p. 1-8, 2013.
BRANCO, M. C.; RODRIGUES, L. L. Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 69, p. 111–132, 2006.
CHENG, C. C. J.; YANG, C. I.; SHEU, C. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry contexto. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 64, p. 81-90, 2014.
COHEN, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988.
CRONBACH, L. J. Coeficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, v. 16, p. 297-334, 1951.
ENDERLE, G. Global competition and corporate responsibilities of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, v. 13, n. 1, p. 51-63, 2004.
GALLEGO-ÁLVAREZ, I.; PRADO-LORENZO, J. M.; GARCIA-SÁNCHES, I. M. Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a resource-based theory. Management Decision, v. 49, n. 10, p. 1709-1727, 2011.
GOLINSKA, P.; KUEBLER, F. The method for assessment of the sustainability maturity in remanufacturing companies. Procedia CIRP 15, p. 201 – 206, 2014.
GRANT, R. M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, Spring, v.33, n.3, p.114-135, 1991.
HAIR, J. F.; BABIN, B.; ANDERSON, R. E.; TATHAM, R. L; BLACK, W. C. Análise Multivariada de Dados. 5 ed. – Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
HAIR, J. F.; HULT, G. T. M.; RINGLE, C. M.; SARSTEDT, M., 2013. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2014.
HALL, J.; VREDENBURG, H. The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 61-68, 2003.
HANSEN, E.; GROSSE-DUNKER, F.; REICHWALD, R. Sustanability Innovation Cube – a framework evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 13, n. 4, p. 683–713, 2009.
HART, S. ‘A natural resource-based view of the firm’. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 4, 1995, p. 986–1014.
______; MILSTEIN, M. B. Creating Sustainable Value. Academy of Management Executive, v. 17, n. 2, p. 56-67, 2003.
HENRIQUES, A.; RICHARDSON, J. The Triple Bottom Line: does it all add up? Assessing the sustainability of business and CSR. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2004.
HENSELER, J.; RINGLE, C. M.; SARSTEDT, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., v. 43, p. 115-135, 2005.
HUSTED, B. W.; ALLEN, D. B. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Long Range Planning, v. 40, p. 594 – 610, 2007.
HYNDS, E. J. B.; RANDT, V.; BUREK, S.; JAGER, W.; KNOX, P.; PARKER, J. P.; SCWARTZ, L.; TAYLOR, J. A.; ZIETLOW, M. Maturity Model for Sustainability in New Product Development: A new assessment tool allows companies to benchmark progress toward sustainability goals and drive NPD growth. Research-Technology Management, p. 50-57, 2014.
JUGDEV, K.; THOMAS, J. Project Management Maturity Models: The Silver Bullets of Competitive Advantage? Project Management Journal v. 33, n. 4, p. 4-14, 2002.
KNEIPP, J. M.; GOMES, C. M.; BICHUET, R. S.; FRIZZO, K.; PERLIN, A. P. "Sustainable innovation practices and their relationship with the performance of industrial companies". Revista de Gestão, v. 26, n. 2, p. 94-111, 2019.
KNEIPP, J. M.; ROSA, L. A. B.; BICHUETI, R. S.; MADRUGA, L. R. R. G.; SCHUCK JÚNIOR, V, F. Eergency of the Sustainable Innovation Thematic: an Analisis of Scientific Production Through Web of Science Base. Rev. Adm. UFSM, v. 4, n. 3, p. 442-457, 2011.
LEE, L.; PETTER, S.; FAYARD, D.; ROBINSON, S. (2011). On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, v. 12, n. 4, p. 305–328, 2011.
LIMA, D.; POZZOBON, J. Amazônia Socioambiental. Sustentabilidade ecológica e diversidade social. Estudos Avançados, v. 19, n. 5, 2005.
LOPEZ-VALEIRAS, E.; GOMEZ´CONDE, J.; NARANJO-GIL, D. Sustainable Innovation, Management Accounting and Control Systems, and International Performance. Sustainability, v. 7, p. 3479-3492, 2015.
MACGREGOR, S. P.; FONTRODONA, J. Exploring the fit Between CSR and Innovation. IESE Business School - University of Navarra, 2008.
MACHADO, C. G.; LIMA, E. P.; COSTA, S. E. G.; ANGELIS, J. J.; MATTIODA, R. Framing maturity based on sustainable operations management principles. International Journal of Production Economics, p. 1-71, 2017.
MARREWIJK, M. V. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 44, p. 95–105, 2003.
MARREWIJK, M. V.; WERRE, M. Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Europe Union, 2002.
MCWILLIAMS, A.; SIEGEL, D. Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 1, p. 117-127, 2001.
_____ Creating and Capturing Value: Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Resource-Based Theory, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, v. 37, n. 5, p. 1480-1495, 2011.
NIDUMOLU, R.; PRAHALD, C. K.; RABGASWAMI, M. R. Why Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, n. 87, n. 9, p. 56-64, 2009.
NGAI, E. W. T.; CHAU, D. C. K.; POON, J. K. L.; TO, C. K. M. Energy and utility management maturity model for sustainable manufacturing process. Int. J. Production Economics, v. 146, n. 2, p. 453-464, 2013.
NUNNALLY, J. C.; BERSTEIN, I. H. Pyschometric theory – 3 ed. New York: MacGraw-Hill, 1994.
PETERAF, M.; BARNEY, J. “Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle”. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 24, p. 309-323, 2003.
RUSSO, M.; FOUTS, P. ‘A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability’. Academy of Management Journal, v. 40, n. 3, p. 534–559, 1997.
STREINER, D. L. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn ́t matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, v. 80, p. 217-222, 2003.
TEO, T. S. H.; SRIVASTAVA, S. C.; JIANG, L. Trust abd eletronic government sucess: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 25, n. 3, p. 99-132, 2008.
VARADARAJAN, R. Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., v. 45, p. 14–36, 2017.
WETZELS, M.; ODEKERKEN-SCHRODER, G.; VAN OPPEN, C. Using PLS Path Modeing for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, v. 33, n. 1, p. 177-195, 2009.
WITHISUPHAKORN, P.; JIRAPORN, P. The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters, p. 1-4. 2015.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.
