Hackathons as a strategy for open innovation: insights from events in Brazil and Canada

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465969319

Keywords:

Hackathons, Open Innovation, Results, Multiple Case Study

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aims to analyze the elements and practices used in hackathons for software development and how they contribute to the success of the events.
Design/methodology/approach: Through a qualitative and exploratory approach, a multiple case study was used to analyze two hackathon events in Brazil and Canada organized by a multinational technology company. Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Data analysis was conducted using content analysis.
Findings: The results illustrate that the participation of people with different profiles and knowledge is important for hackathon results. The support provided to participants and the choice of the proposed challenge affect participants’ perception of the event and the solutions developed.
Research limitations/implications: As this is a multiple case study of a qualitative nature, it is infeasible to establish generalizations based on the results, and it is only possible to present evidence and proposals based on the specific cases.
Practical implications: Proposed best practices to be followed in organizing hackathons, specifically in the context of software development.
Originality/value: Few studies treat the subject of hackathons, and rarer still consider different countries to analyze the enabling elements based on different structures and their contributions to innovation. The development of hackathons as an alternative for innovation in the software area is also investigated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Douglas Wegner, Fundação Dom Cabral, Nova Lima, MG

Doutor em Administração pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2011), com período-sanduíche na Universität zu Köln (Alemanha). Atualmente é professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos). 

Flávio Régio Brambilla, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul, RS

Bacharel em Administração (2002) e Bacharel em Direito (2016) pela Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), com o desenvolvimento de estudo na relação entre os aspectos legais e práticas de Marketing. Especialista em Recursos Humanos (2003) pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), onde trabalhou com Marketing Interno. Especialista em Gestão Organizacional (2004) pela ULBRA. Especialista em Educação a Distância (2007) e Especialista em Gestão Educacional (2008) pelo SENAC/RS, onde foram desenvolvidos trabalhos orientados para educação e consultoria, com ênfase em Marketing de Relacionamento e CRM. Especialista em Gestão da Aprendizagem e Modelos Híbridos de Educação (2020). Mestre em Administração e Negócios: Marketing (2006) pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), onde desenvolveu estudos e trabalhos de Marketing, sendo a Dissertação centrada em Customer Relationship Management (CRM), com abordagem contemplando a relação entre empresas desenvolvedora e usuária da ferramenta, orientada ao Marketing de Relacionamento. Doutor em Administração (2010) pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), cuja Tese abordou as temáticas da Lógica Dominante do Serviço e da Cocriação de Valor, com ênfase na aplicação orientada para Marketing Education no Ensino Superior. Experiência em docência superior de graduação e pós-graduação em Universidades do Rio Grande do Sul, com mais de 15 anos de atuação, inclusive no Stricto Sensu desde 2011.

References

Anshari, M., & Almunawar, M.N. (2022). Adopting open innovation for SMEs and industrial revolution 4.0. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(2), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2020-0061

Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Briscoe, G., & Mulligan, C. (2014). Digital innovation: The hackathon phenomenon [Working Paper Nº 6]. Creative Works London, Londres.

Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.

Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2017). Novas fronteiras em inovação aberta. São Paulo: Blucher.

Cobham, D., Gowen, C., Jacques, K., Laurel, J., & Ringham, S. (2017, março). From appfest to entrepreneurs: using a hackathon event to seed a university student-led enterprise. International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Espanha, 11.

Cobham, D., Gowen, C., Hargrave, B., Jacques, K., Laurel, J., & Ringham, S. (2017, July). From hackathon to student enterprise: an evaluation of creating successful and sustainable student entrepreneurial activity initiated by a university hackathon. International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Espanha, 9.

Covic, Z., & Manojlovic, H. (2019, setembro). Developing Key Competencies through Hackathon Based Learning. International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Subotica, Sérvia, 17.

Dwivedi, N., Katiyar, D., & Goel, G. (2022). A Comparative Study of Various Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models. IJRESM, 5(3), 141–144.

Feldmann, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2021). Success factors for hackathons: German banks collaborate to tame the economic crisis. Journal of Business Strategy, 42(6), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-06-2020-0114

Ferreira, K. F. O., Guimarães, L. de O., Salume, P. K., & Doyle, M. L. de F. C. P. (2022). Analysis of the entrepreneurial process from effectuation and causation logic: a case study in two companies from Minas Gerais. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 15(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465964831

Filippova, A., Trainer, E., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2017, maio). From diversity by numbers to diversity as process: supporting inclusiveness in software development teams with brainstorming. International Conference on Software Engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 39.

Franco, S., Presenza, A., & Petruzzelli, A.M. (2022). Boosting innovative business ideas through hackathons. The “Hack for Travel” case study. European Journal of Innovation Management,25(6), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2021-0300

Flick, U. (2004). Uma introdução à Pesquisa Qualitativa (2a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Flores, M., Golob, M., Maklin, D., Herrera, M., Tucci, C., Al-Ashaab, A., Williams, L., Encinas, A., Martinez, V., Zaki, M., Sosa, L., & Pineda, K. F. (2018, agosto). How can hackathons accelerate corporate innovation? International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Seoul, Coréia do Sul.

Godoy, A. S. (1995). Pesquisa qualitativa: tipos fundamentais. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 35(2), 57-63.

Kitsios, F., & Kamariotou, M. (2019). Open data hackathons: an innovative strategy to enhance entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(4), 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-06-2017-0055

Komssi, M., Pichlis, D., Raatikainen, M., Kindström, K., & Järvinen, J. (2014). What are hackathonsfor? IEEE Software, 32(5), 60-67.

Lean Analytics Association. (2018). Lean Innovation Model. Via Colombei, 2018. Disponível em: http://lean-analytics.org/lean-innovation-model/. Acesso em: 31 out. 2019.

Mahmudova, S. (2022). Development of a Conceptual Model for Intelligent Software System Designing. Review of Information Engineering and Applications, 9(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.18488/79.v9i1.2967

Mehta, N., Bist, S.S., & Shah, P. (2022). Hackathons: what do engineering educators think about it?. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2021-0064

Muller, F. M., & Dal Forno, G. B. (2017). Construction and validation of an Instrument for Evaluation of Critical Factors in Software Development Projects. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 10(4), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465926726

Naumović, T., Vajagić, B., Cvetković, L., & Proročić, M. (2022). Open innovations and the role of hackathons. E-Business Technologies Conference Proceedings, 2(1), 42–45.

Obradović, T.; Vlačić, B., & Dabić, M. (2021). Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda. Technovation, 102, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221

Palmeira, E. P.; Lima, R. T.; Oliveira, E. R. & Serralvo, F. A. (2014). A eficácia na utilização do paradigma de inovação aberta pelas empresas como um diferencial de competitividade e criação de valor. Revista Brasileira de Administração Científica, 5(1), 236-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.6008/SPC2179684X.2014.001.0014

Pe-Than, E. P. P., Nolte, A., Filippova, A., Bird, C., Scallen, S., & Herbsleb, J. (2020). Corporate hackathons, how and why? A multiple case study of motivation, projects proposal and selection, goal setting, coordination, and outcomes. Human–Computer Interaction, 1-33.

Petry, D. R., Oro, I. M., Suzana, J., Lorentz, J. A., Piekas, A. A. S., & Paludo, J. C. (2020). Organizational performance: influence of contingency factors in Santa Catarina software development companies. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 13(1), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465929370

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation Experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14.

Roesch, S. M. A. (1999). Projetos de estágio e de pesquisa em administração: guia para estágios, trabalhos de conclusão, dissertações e estudos de caso (2a ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Rosell, B., Kumar, S., & Shepherd, J. (2014, May). Unleashing innovation through internal hackathons. Innovations in Technology Conference, Warwick, Rhode Island, EUA.

Saccol, A. (Org.), Vasconcellos, L., Machado, L., & Azevedo, D. (2012). Metodologia de pesquisa em administração: uma abordagem prática. São Leopoldo: Unisinos.

Seravalli, A., & Simeone, L. (2016). Performing hackathons as a way of positioning boundary organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(3), 326-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2013-0060

Serek, A., Zhaparov, M., Yoo, S. M., Talasbek, A., Kim, Y. K., & Jin, M. W. (2020). Best Practices in Running IT Hackthons Based on Paragon University Dataset. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(19), 231-238.

Tucci, C., Maklin, D., Golob, M., & Flores, M. (2019, junho). Speeding Up Innovation with Business Hackathons: Insights into three Case Studies. Academy for Design Innovation Management Conference, Londres, Reino Unido.

Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de Caso: planejamento e métodos (5a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Werlang, B. L., & Werlang, N. B. (2021). Absorptive capacity and innovation: an analysis of business management of young entrepreneurs. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 14, 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465964692

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16

How to Cite

Schaedler, C., Wegner, D., & Brambilla, F. R. (2022). Hackathons as a strategy for open innovation: insights from events in Brazil and Canada. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 15(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465969319

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 4 (2022): Oct-Dec

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Administração da UFSM

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0), which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.