Offensiveness of controversial products for students of three different fields of study in Brazil




Controversial products, Unmentionable products, Socially sensitive products, Advertising offensive products, Fields of study


Purpose: investigate the offensiveness of controversial products in Brazil, especially the influence of the field of study.

Design/methodology/approach: a questionnaire with 11 controversial products was conventionally answered by a sample of 368 college students from the three most popular fields of study in Brazil (i.e. Human Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences, and Exact and Technological Sciences). The offensiveness of each controversial product was measured and compared across those fields of study through t-tests.

Findings: Controversial products did not easily offend respondents being guns, weight-loss medicine, and female underwear the most offensive ones. In general, students of Human Sciences are the most easily offended and those of Exact and Technological Sciences the least offended. In addition, results showed differences and similarities between people from each field of study.

Originality/value: Improvement of our knowledge about controversial products in Brazil, especially about the influence of the field of study in the offensiveness of controversial products.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

João Lucas Hana Frade, University of São Paulo

PhD student at the School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo.

Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira, University of São Paulo

Associate Professor at the Business Administration Department at the School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo

Janaina de Moura Engracia Giraldi, University of São Paulo

Associate Professor at the Business Administration Department at the School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo


Akhter, W., Abbasi, A. S., & Umar, S. (2011). Ethical issues in advertising in Pakistan: an Islamic perspective. World Applied Sciences Journal, 13(3), 444-452.

Alencar, E. M. (1997). O estímulo à criatividade no contexto universitário. Psicologia escolar e educacional, 1(2-3), 29-37.

Alter, J. (1982). A delicate balance: not everything goes in the marketing of unmentionables. Advertising Age, 53(29), M2-3.

Altonji, J. G., Arcidiacono, P., & Maurel, A. (2016). The analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: Determinants and wage effects. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 5, pp. 305-396). Elsevier.

Boddewyn, J. J. (1991). Controlling sex and decency in advertising around the world. Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 25-35.

Boucher, K. L., Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B., & Murphy, M. C. (2017). Can I work with and help others in this field? How communal goals influence interest and participation in STEM fields. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 901.

Boudarbat, B. (2008). Field of study choice by community college students in Canada. Economics of Education Review, 27(1), 79-93.

Bruun, M., Willoughby, S., & Smith, J. L. (2018). Identifying the stereotypical who, what, and why of physics and biology. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020125.

Chatjuthamard, P., Wongboonsin, P., Kongsompong, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2018). How do socially controversial companies do during a stressful time? Evidence from the Great Recession. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance.

Chen, P. D., & Simpson, P. A. (2015). Does personality matter? Applying Holland’s typology to analyze students’ self-selection into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 725-750.

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?. Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1.

Choudhary, A. K. (2018). Aspartame: should individuals with Type II Diabetes be taking it?. Current diabetes reviews, 14(4), 350-362.

CNPq (2017). Evaluation Table. Retrieved July 24, 2019, from

Código Brasileiro de Autorregulamentação Publicitária (2021). Retrieved August 04, 2021, from

Conselho Nacional de Autorregulamentação Publicitária (2021). Retrieved August 04, 2021, from

Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil (1998). Retrieved August 04, 2021, from

Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (1997). Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Social forces, 75(4), 1417-1438.

Edwards, L., & Lomax, W. (2017). Financial credit and social discredit: the pawnbroking dilemma. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 22(2), 77-84.)

Fahy, J., Smart, D., Pride, W., & Ferrell, O. C. (1995). Advertising sensitive products. International Journal of Advertising, 14(3), 231-243.

Fam, K. S., & Waller, D. S. (2003). Advertising controversial products in the Asia Pacific: what makes them offensive?. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(3), 237-250.

Fam, K. S., Waller, D. S., & Erdogan, Z. B. (2004). The influence of religion on attitudes towards the advertising of controversial products. European Journal of marketing, 38(5/6), 537-555.

Fam, K. S., Waller, D. S., & Yang, Z. (2009). Addressing the advertising of controversial products in China: An empirical approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 43-58.

Farah, M. F., & El Samad, L. (2014). The effects of religion and religiosity on advertisement assessment among Lebanese consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(4), 344-369.

Farah, M. F., & El Samad, L. (2015). Controversial product advertisements in Lebanon: A study of Sunni-Shi’a sectarian disparities and similarities. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 6(1), 22-43.

Gasparotto, G. S., Gasparotto, L. P., de Salles, M. R., & Campos, W. (2013). Fatores de risco cardiovascular em universitários: comparação entre sexos, períodos de graduação e áreas de estudo. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto. Online), 46(2), 154-163.

Giraldi, J. M. E. (2006). A influência dos valores pessoais dos consumidores no efeito país de origem: um estudo com eletrodomésticos chineses (Doctoral dissertation). University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo. Retrieved September 06, 2019, from

Giraldo, P. C., Polo, R. C., Amaral, R. L. G. D., Reis, V. V., Beghini, J., & Bardin, M. G. (2013). Hábitos e costumes de mulheres universitárias quanto ao uso de roupas íntimas, adornos genitais, depilação e práticas sexuais. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia.

Gondim, S. M. G. (2002). Perfil profissional e mercado de trabalho: relação com formação acadêmica pela perspectiva de estudantes universitários. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 7(2), 299-309.

Google Ads policies (2021). Retrieved September 06, 2019, from

Gupta, S. (2016). A conceptual framework that identifies antecedents and consequences of building socially responsible international brands. Thunderbird International Business Review, 58(3), 225-237.

Huertas, M. K. Z., & Campomar, M. C. (2008). Apelos racionais e emocionais na propaganda de medicamentos de prescrição: estudo de um remédio para emagrecer. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 13, 651-662.

Ito, T., & McPherson, E. (2018). Factors influencing high school students’ interest in pSTEM. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1535.

Jensen, K., & Collins, S. (2008). The third-person effect in controversial product advertising. American behavioral scientist, 52(2), 225-242.

Johnson, R. A., & Bhattacharyya, G. K. (2010). Statistics: principles and methods. John Wiley & Sons.

Katsanis, L. P. (1994). Do unmentionable products still exist? An empirical investigation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 3(4), 5-14.

Kirkeboen, L. J., Leuven, E., & Mogstad, M. (2016). Field of study, earnings, and self-selection. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1057-1111.

Lessing, B. (2005). Demanda por armas de fogo no Rio de Janeiro. Brasil: as armas e as vítimas. Rio de Janeiro: ISER/7 Letras.

Lewis, K. L., & Hodges, S. D. (2015). Expanding the concept of belonging in academic domains: Development and validation of the Ability Uncertainty Scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 197-202

Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Using a belonging framework to understand gender disparities in persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 420-436.

Maclean, J. C., Oney, M., Marti, J., & Sindelar, J. (2018). What factors predict the passage of state‐level e‐cigarette regulations?. Health economics, 27(5), 897-907.

Malgwi, C. A., Howe, M. A., & Burnaby, P. A. (2005). Influences on students' choice of college major. Journal of Education for Business, 80(5), 275-282.

Martins, R. M. M., Santos, A. A. A., & Bariani, I. C. D. (2005). Estilos cognitivos e compreensão leitora em universitários. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 15(30), 57-68.

McMenamin, J. (2017). The Influence of Beliefs and Gender on Choosing, and Feeling Like You Belong in Engineering.

Miranda, V. P. N., Filgueiras, J. F., Neves, C. M., Teixeira, P. C., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2012). Insatisfação corporal em universitários de diferentes áreas de conhecimento. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 61(1), 25-32.

Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44(5-6), 295-320.

Pitt, L. F., & Abratt, R. (1988). Music in advertisements for unmentionable products—A classical conditioning experiment. International Journal of Advertising, 7(2), 130-137.

Reast, J., Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2013). Legitimacy-seeking organizational strategies in controversial industries: A case study analysis and a bidimensional model. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 139-153.

Scopus (2019). What is Scopus?. Retrieved July 06, 2019, from

Shao, A. T. (1993). Restrictions on Advertising Items That May Not Be Considered" Decent": A European Viewpoint. Journal of Euromarketing, 2(3), 23-43.

Shao, A. T., & Hill, J. S. (1994). Global television advertising restrictions: the case of socially sensitive products. International Journal of Advertising, 13(4), 347-366.

Skatova, A., & Ferguson, E. (2014). Why do different people choose different university degrees? Motivation and the choice of degree. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1244.

Sodano, V., Riverso, R., & Scafuto, F. (2018). Investigating the intention to reduce palm oil consumption. Calitatea, 19(S1), 500-505.

Souza, R. F. (2004). Áreas do conhecimento. DataGramaZero - Revista de Ciência da Informação, 5(2).

Souza, R. F. (2006). Organização e representação de áreas do conhecimento em ciência e tecnologia: princípios de agregação em grandes áreas segundo diferentes contextos de produção e uso de informação 10.5007/1518-2924.2006 v11nesp1p27. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 11(1), 27-41.

Tariq, M., & Khan, M. A. (2017). Offensive advertising: a religion based Indian study. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(4), 656-668.

Taylor, C. R., & Raymond, M. A. (2000). An analysis of product category restrictions in advertising in four major East Asian markets. International Marketing Review.

Triff, M., Benningfield, D., & Murphy, J. H. (1987). Advertising ethics: A study of public attitudes and perceptions. In Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 50-54).

Tsagarakis, K. P., Menegaki, A. N., Siarapi, K., & Zacharopoulou, F. (2013). Safety alerts reduce willingness to visit parks irrigated with recycled water. Journal of Risk Research, 16(2), 133-144.

Waller, D. S. (1999). Attitudes towards offensive advertising: an Australian study. Journal of consumer marketing, 16(3), 288-295.

Waller, D. S. (2005). A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of promotion management, 11(2-3), 3-15.

Waller, D. S. (2006). A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of promotion management, 11(2-3), 3-15.

Waller, D. S., Fam, K. S., & Erdogan, B. (2005). Advertising of controversial products: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 6-13.

Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The marketing of unmentionables. Harvard Business Review, 59(1), 91.

Wilson, A., & West, C. (1995). Commentary: permissive marketing–the effects of the AIDS crisis on marketing practices and messages. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 4(5), 34-48.

Wünsch Filho, V., Mirra, A. P., López, R. V. M., & Antunes, L. F. (2010). Tabagismo e câncer no Brasil: evidências e perspectivas. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 13, 175-187.

Xu, Y., Summers, T. A., & Belleau, B. D. (2004). Who buys American alligator?: Predicting purchase intention of a controversial product. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1189-1198.




How to Cite

Frade, J. L. H., Oliveira, J. H. C. de, & Giraldi, J. de M. E. (2021). Offensiveness of controversial products for students of three different fields of study in Brazil . Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 14, 1280–1299.

Most read articles by the same author(s)