Maturity in sustainable innovation and corporate social responsibility: implications in business performance

Edilson Bacinello, Gerson Tontini, Anete Alberton

Abstract


Sustainable Innovation is strategically associated with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), integrating the economic, social and environmental dimensions in a joint and integrated manner. As a way of verifying this association and its implications for business performance (BP), the models of Maturity in Sustainable Innovation (MSI) and Maturity of Corporate Social Responsibility (MCSR) allow us to identify how companies are evolving in a certain area and, from there, create business value and gain competitive advantage. Based on Resource-Based Theory, the present study examines the influence of MSI on MCSR and the mediator effect of MCSR on the relationship between MSI and BP. The analysis is based on Structural Equations Modeling, considering a sample of 58 companies based in the Amazon region, Brazil. The results indicate a strong relationship between MSI and MCSR; that MCSR positively influences BP; and that MCSR exerts a positive mediator effect on the relationship between MSI and BP. These results allow us to advance our strategy studies, providing mechanisms for managing sustainability-related practices as possible sources for analyzing value generation and promoting competitive advantages for companies.


Keywords


Maturidade em Inovação Sustentável; Maturidade em Responsabilidade Social Corporativa; Estratégia; Desempenho.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ASHFORD, N. A.; HALL, R. P. The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, v. 3, p. 270-292, 2011.

ATKINSON, G.; NEVILL, A. M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med, v. 26, n. 4, p. 217-238, 1998.

BACINELLO, E.; TONTINI, G. Relationship between Maturity in Sustainable Innovation and Business Performance. Rev. Adm. UFSM, v. 11, ed. Especial Engema, p. 843-857, 2018.

BANSAL, P. “Evolving Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development”. Strategic Management Journal, v. 26, p. 197–218, 2005.

BARBIERI, J. C.; VASCONCELOS, I. F. G.; ANDREASSI, T.; VASCONCELOS, F. C. Inovação e Sustentabilidade: Novos Modelos e Proposições. RAE - São Paulo, v. 50, n. 2, p. 146-154, 2010.

BARNEY, J. B. Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n.1, p. 99-120, 1991.

______ HESTERLY, W. S. Administração Estratégica e Vantagem Competitiva: casos brasileiros. São Paulo: Pearson, 2007.

BAUMGARTNER, R. J.; EBNER, D. Corporate Sustainability Strategies: Sustainability Profiles and Maturity Levels. Sustainable Development, v. 18, p. 76–89, 2010.

BOONS, F.; MONTALVO, C.; QUIST, J.; WAGNER, M. Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 45, p. 1-8, 2013.

BRANCO, M. C.; RODRIGUES, L. L. Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 69, p. 111–132, 2006.

CHENG, C. C. J.; YANG, C. I.; SHEU, C. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry contexto. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 64, p. 81-90, 2014.

COHEN, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988.

CRONBACH, L. J. Coeficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, v. 16, p. 297-334, 1951.

ENDERLE, G. Global competition and corporate responsibilities of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, v. 13, n. 1, p. 51-63, 2004.

GALLEGO-ÁLVAREZ, I.; PRADO-LORENZO, J. M.; GARCIA-SÁNCHES, I. M. Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a resource-based theory. Management Decision, v. 49, n. 10, p. 1709-1727, 2011.

GOLINSKA, P.; KUEBLER, F. The method for assessment of the sustainability maturity in remanufacturing companies. Procedia CIRP 15, p. 201 – 206, 2014.

GRANT, R. M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, Spring, v.33, n.3, p.114-135, 1991.

HAIR, J. F.; BABIN, B.; ANDERSON, R. E.; TATHAM, R. L; BLACK, W. C. Análise Multivariada de Dados. 5 ed. – Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.

HAIR, J. F.; HULT, G. T. M.; RINGLE, C. M.; SARSTEDT, M., 2013. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2014.

HALL, J.; VREDENBURG, H. The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 61-68, 2003.

HANSEN, E.; GROSSE-DUNKER, F.; REICHWALD, R. Sustanability Innovation Cube – a framework evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 13, n. 4, p. 683–713, 2009.

HART, S. ‘A natural resource-based view of the firm’. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 4, 1995, p. 986–1014.

______; MILSTEIN, M. B. Creating Sustainable Value. Academy of Management Executive, v. 17, n. 2, p. 56-67, 2003.

HENRIQUES, A.; RICHARDSON, J. The Triple Bottom Line: does it all add up? Assessing the sustainability of business and CSR. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2004.

HENSELER, J.; RINGLE, C. M.; SARSTEDT, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., v. 43, p. 115-135, 2005.

HUSTED, B. W.; ALLEN, D. B. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Long Range Planning, v. 40, p. 594 – 610, 2007.

HYNDS, E. J. B.; RANDT, V.; BUREK, S.; JAGER, W.; KNOX, P.; PARKER, J. P.; SCWARTZ, L.; TAYLOR, J. A.; ZIETLOW, M. Maturity Model for Sustainability in New Product Development: A new assessment tool allows companies to benchmark progress toward sustainability goals and drive NPD growth. Research-Technology Management, p. 50-57, 2014.

JUGDEV, K.; THOMAS, J. Project Management Maturity Models: The Silver Bullets of Competitive Advantage? Project Management Journal v. 33, n. 4, p. 4-14, 2002.

KNEIPP, J. M.; GOMES, C. M.; BICHUET, R. S.; FRIZZO, K.; PERLIN, A. P. "Sustainable innovation practices and their relationship with the performance of industrial companies". Revista de Gestão, v. 26, n. 2, p. 94-111, 2019.

KNEIPP, J. M.; ROSA, L. A. B.; BICHUETI, R. S.; MADRUGA, L. R. R. G.; SCHUCK JÚNIOR, V, F. Eergency of the Sustainable Innovation Thematic: an Analisis of Scientific Production Through Web of Science Base. Rev. Adm. UFSM, v. 4, n. 3, p. 442-457, 2011.

LEE, L.; PETTER, S.; FAYARD, D.; ROBINSON, S. (2011). On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, v. 12, n. 4, p. 305–328, 2011.

LIMA, D.; POZZOBON, J. Amazônia Socioambiental. Sustentabilidade ecológica e diversidade social. Estudos Avançados, v. 19, n. 5, 2005.

LOPEZ-VALEIRAS, E.; GOMEZ´CONDE, J.; NARANJO-GIL, D. Sustainable Innovation, Management Accounting and Control Systems, and International Performance. Sustainability, v. 7, p. 3479-3492, 2015.

MACGREGOR, S. P.; FONTRODONA, J. Exploring the fit Between CSR and Innovation. IESE Business School - University of Navarra, 2008.

MACHADO, C. G.; LIMA, E. P.; COSTA, S. E. G.; ANGELIS, J. J.; MATTIODA, R. Framing maturity based on sustainable operations management principles. International Journal of Production Economics, p. 1-71, 2017.

MARREWIJK, M. V. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 44, p. 95–105, 2003.

MARREWIJK, M. V.; WERRE, M. Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Europe Union, 2002.

MCWILLIAMS, A.; SIEGEL, D. Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 1, p. 117-127, 2001.

_____ Creating and Capturing Value: Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Resource-Based Theory, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, v. 37, n. 5, p. 1480-1495, 2011.

NIDUMOLU, R.; PRAHALD, C. K.; RABGASWAMI, M. R. Why Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, n. 87, n. 9, p. 56-64, 2009.

NGAI, E. W. T.; CHAU, D. C. K.; POON, J. K. L.; TO, C. K. M. Energy and utility management maturity model for sustainable manufacturing process. Int. J. Production Economics, v. 146, n. 2, p. 453-464, 2013.

NUNNALLY, J. C.; BERSTEIN, I. H. Pyschometric theory – 3 ed. New York: MacGraw-Hill, 1994.

PETERAF, M.; BARNEY, J. “Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle”. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 24, p. 309-323, 2003.

RUSSO, M.; FOUTS, P. ‘A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability’. Academy of Management Journal, v. 40, n. 3, p. 534–559, 1997.

STREINER, D. L. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn ́t matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, v. 80, p. 217-222, 2003.

TEO, T. S. H.; SRIVASTAVA, S. C.; JIANG, L. Trust abd eletronic government sucess: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 25, n. 3, p. 99-132, 2008.

VARADARAJAN, R. Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., v. 45, p. 14–36, 2017.

WETZELS, M.; ODEKERKEN-SCHRODER, G.; VAN OPPEN, C. Using PLS Path Modeing for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, v. 33, n. 1, p. 177-195, 2009.

WITHISUPHAKORN, P.; JIRAPORN, P. The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters, p. 1-4. 2015.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465938666


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  

   

       

 

------

Revista de Administração da UFSM. Brazilian Journal of Management

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, eISSN 1983-4659