Strauss on Locke: liberalism and the modern political turn

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797593175

Keywords:

Individual rights, Political philosophy, Democracy, Esotericism, Private property

Abstract

The article analyzes how Strauss interprets the thought of John Locke as a modern thinker whose role was decisive for the doctrine of political liberalism. To this end, it investigates the esoteric method of reading that Strauss applies to the work of the English philosopher. It then examines Strauss’s thesis that the foundation of Locke’s political teaching is the individual right to self-preservation. The article is based on a bibliographic review of Strauss’s works and those of his commentators. It also explores criticisms and interpretations by other scholars on Locke, in order to contrast or endorse Strauss’s peculiar reading. The research concludes that, for Strauss, Locke advances an atheistic and subversive philosophy, albeit disguised in Calvinist rhetoric; and that he aligns with the modern tradition of Machiavelli and Hobbes, against classical and medieval political philosophy. In this interpretation, Locke breaks with the notion of an order of human ends according to the perfection of nature or revealed law. As a result, he shifts the aim of political order toward the ideal of comfortable individual self-preservation, whose corollary is the thesis that the end of political society is to guarantee individual rights and property. From this perspective, Locke appears as an important founder of liberalism, understood as a regime that ultimately seeks to secure and protect rights. The study aims to contribute to reflection in the field of political theory in general, and in Strauss’s thought in particular.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Iann Endo Lobo , Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Doutor em Sociologia e Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Coordenador, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

References

ASHCRAFT, Richard. Faith and Knowledge in Locke's Philosophy. In: YOLTON, J. John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 194-223, 1969.

ASHCRAFT, Richard. Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823420

BEST, J. The Innocent, the Ignorant, and the Rational: The Content of Lockian Consent. In: DEUTSCH, Kenneth (Ed.), The Crisis of Liberal Democracy: A Straussian Perspective. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 30-47, 1987.

BLITZ, Mark. Mark Blitz on Ancient and Modern Political Philosophy. Disponível em: https://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/mark-blitz-transcript/#locke. Acesso em 30/01/2019.

COSTA, J. G. C. da. Leo Strauss sobre o Problema de Sócrates em As Nuvens. InterAção, v. 15, n. 4, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797589752

DUNN, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the 'Two Treatises of Government'. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558436

DUNN, John. Review: Revolutionary Politics and Locke's 'Two Treatises of Government by Richard Ashcraft. Journal of Modern History, vol. 60, n.2, p. 366–68, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/600351

DUNN, John. Measuring Locke’s Shadow. In: LOCKE, John. Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 257-285, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300129182-007

EDENS, Robert. Natural Right and History: A Study of Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

GOUGH, John. John Locke's Political Philosophy: Eight Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.

GREEN, Jeffrey Edward. Political Theory as Both Philosophy and History: A Defense against Methodological Militancy. Annual Review of Political Science, vol.18, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051713-123049

LOCKE, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.

LOCKE, John. Mr. Locke’s Reply to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcester’s Answer to His Second Letter. In: ______. The Works of John Locke in Nine Volumes. 12. ed. London: Rivington, 1824. Não paginado. Disponível em: https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/locke-works-of-john-locke-vol-3. Acesso em: 12 jul. 2025

LOCKE, John. The Reasonableness of Christianity: As Delivered in the Scriptures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

LOCKE, John. Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

MACPHERSON, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.

MAJOR, Rafael. The Cambridge School and Leo Strauss: Texts and Context of American Political Science. Political Research Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 477-485, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800301

MELZER, Arthur. Philosophy between the lines: the lost history of esoteric writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226175126.001.0001

RABIEH, Michael. The Reasonableness of Locke or the Questionableness of Christianity. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 933-957, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2131861

SHAPIRO, Ian. Introduction. In: LOCKE, John. Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

STRAUSS, Leo. An Introduction to Political Philosophy: Ten Essays. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1989.

STRAUSS, Leo. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

STRAUSS, Leo. Thoughts on Machiavelli. Nova York: The Free Press, 1958.

STRAUSS, Leo. What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

SILVA, Igor. Teoria Política: Filosofia ou História? Reflexões sobre Leo Strauss e Quentin Skinner em torno do Historicismo. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia Política), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2022.

ROMEIRO, Richard. The Subversion of Ancient Thought: Strauss’s Interpretation of the Modern Philosophic Project. Manuscrito – Revista Internacional de Filosofia, v. 43, n. 3, pp. 1-54, Jul.-Sep. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.ro

ZUCKERT, Michael P. John Locke and the Problem of Civil Religion. In: Horwitz, Robert (Ed.), The Moral Foundations of the American Republic. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, pp. 181-203, 2001.

Published

2025-08-22

How to Cite

Lobo , I. E. (2025). Strauss on Locke: liberalism and the modern political turn. InterAção, 16(3), e93175. https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797593175