Comparison of temporal and spatial variation of periphytic algal community in two urban lakes in Umuarama-PR (Brazil)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X42938Keywords:
Periphyton, Ammoniacal Nitrogen, Urbanization.Abstract
Water resources are very important for all living organisms, and as being of vital importance need to be preserved. Thus, many water bodies are monitored as an essential strategy for identification of possible alterations over space and time. The analyses were performed in two different hydrological conditions, and water sample and rocks were collected in two different points at each lake. The results showed higher values of Ammoniacal Nitrogen in Aratimbó Lake, mainly during dry period (Ammoniacal Nitrogen = 4.2 mgL-1) at P1. However, P2 at Tucuruvi Lake presented higher concentration of Orthophosphate (2.24 mgL-1). Total Periphyton density also demonstrated variation among the different hydrological scenarios and lakes. The Highest density was of 385.30 10³ ind.cm-2at Aratimbó Lake and 180.43 10³ ind.cm-2at Tucuruvi Lake in rainy condition. Comparing the predominance of species, In Aratimbó Lake, Chlorophyceae class was predominant at P1, while Cyanophyceae class was predominant at P2. In dry period, Bacillarophyceae class was seen as the predominant class for both of lakes and for all sampling points. Differently from Aratimbó Lake, in Tucuruvi Lake Bacillarophyceae class was predominant in both of hydrological scenarios.
Downloads
References
ADAME KL, DUNCK B, RODRIGUES L. Periphytic algal Community in lentic environments of the upper Paraná River floodplain: seasonal and spatial variation. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 2018;30.
Al-SHAMI SA, MD RAWI CS, AHMAD AH, ABDUL HAMID S, MOHD NOR SA. Influence of agricultural, industrial, and anthropogenic stresses on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates in Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2011;74(5):1195–1202.
APHA AWWA WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 2005;21. Washington, DC; USA.
BELLINGER EG, SIGEE DC. Freshwater Algae: Identification and use as bioindicators. Wiley-Blackwell. 2010;1.
BHATERIA R, JAIN D. Water quality assessment of lake water: a review. Sustain. Water. Resource. Manag. 2016;2:161-173.
BICHOFF A, OSÓRIO NC, DUNCK B, RODRIGUES L. Periphytic algae in a floodplain lake and river under low water conditions. Biota Neotropica. 2016;16(3).
BICUDO CE, MENEZES MA. Gêneros de algas continentais do Brasil: chave para identificação e descrições. 2 ed. São Carlos: Rima. 502p; 2006.
BOTARI JC, BOTARI A, OLIVEIRA BC, SANTOS LN, DANELUZZI NS, HATSUMURA PM. Análise ambiental urbana e proposta de intervenção nos bairros Jardim Harmonia e Jardim Aratimbó do município de Umuarama região noroeste do Paraná. XIV International Conference on Engineering and Technology Education. 2016; Salvador-BA; Brasil.
CAETANO ICS da, MARTINS LA de, MERLINI LS. Análise da qualidade da água e dos peixes do lago Aratimbó, Umuarama PR - Brasil. Arq. Ciênc. Saúde UNIPAR; 2011 maio/agosto; Umuarama; BR. 15(2):149-157.
CETTO JM, LEANDRINI JÁ, FELISBERTO SA, RODRIGUES L. Comunidade de algas perifíticas no reservatório de Irai, Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Acta Scientiarium. Biological Sciences. 2004;26(1):1-7.
CONSALTER BG, MIRANDA DM de, SOUZA JS de, FERRAREZI ADM, FERRAREZI JG, GASQUES LS. Avaliação da contaminação por cobre e chumbo do lago Aratimbó - Umuarama - PR. Arq. Cienc. Saúde UNIPAR; 2019 maio/agosto; Umuarama; BR. 23(2):107-112.
CORDEIRO RS, BARBOSA JEL, LIMA FILHO GQ, BARBOSA LG. Periphytic algae dynamics in lentic ecosystems in the Brazilian semiarid. Braz. J. Biol. 2017;77(3):495-505.
DEBELS P, FIGUEROA R, URRUTIA R, BARRA R, NIELL X. Evaluation of water quality in the Chillán River (Central Chile) using physicochemical parameters and a modified Water Quality Index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2005;110(1–3):301–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8064-1.
DENICOLA DM, KELLY M. Role of periphyton in ecological assessment of lakes. Freshwater Science. 2014;33(2):619–638. https://doi.org/10.1086/676117.
DODDS WK. The role of periphyton in phosphorus retention in shallow freshwater aquatic systems. Journal of Phycology. 2003;39(5):840–849. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02081.x.
FERNANDES VO, CAVATI B, SOUZA BD, MACHADO RG, COSTA AG. Lagoa mãe-bá (Guararapi-Anchieta, ES): Um ecossistema com potencial de floração de cianobactérias. Oecol. Brasil. 2009;13(2):366-381.
FRANÇA JUNIOR P, VILLA MECD. Análise macroscópica nas cabeceiras de drenagem da área urbana de Umuarama, região noroeste - Paraná/Brasil. Geografia Ensino & Pesquisa. 2013;17(1):107-117.
FRANÇA RCS, LOPES MRM, FERRAGUT C. Structural and sucessional variability of periphytic algal community in a Amazonian lake during the dry and rainy season (Rio Branco, Acre). Acta Amazônica. 2011;41(2):257-266.
GOGOI K, SARMA DK, BAISHYA S, BHAGAWATI K, TAMULI KK. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of periphyton composition in carp polyculture system. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2018;6(4):519-526.
GORMAN D, TURRA A, CONNOLLY RM, OLDS AD, SCHLACHER TA. Monitoring nitrogen pollution in seasonally-pulsed coastal waters requires judicious choice of indicator species. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2017;122(1–2):149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.042.
ILIOPOULOU-GEORGUDAKI J, KANTZARIS V, KATHARIOS P, KASPIRIS P, GEORGIADIS T, MONTESANTOU, B. An application of different bioindicators for assessing water quality: A case study in the rivers Alfeios and Pineios (Peloponnisos, Greece). Ecological Indicators, 2003;2(4):345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(03)00004-9
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão (BR). [Cited 2020 jan 6]. Umuarama. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/pr/umuarama/panorama.
INSTITUTO DAS ÁGUAS DO PARANÁ (AP). [internet]. Curitiba. [Cited 2020 jan 7]. Sistema de informações hidrológicas. Available from http://www.aguasparana.pr.gov.br/pagina-264.html.
KANOWNIK W, POLICHT-LATAWIEC A, FUDALA W. Nutrients pollutants in surface waters - Assessing trends in drinking water resource quality for a regional city in central europe. Sustainability. 2019;11:1-15.
KLUIJVER A, NING J, LIU Z, JEPPESEN E, GULATI, RD, MIDDELBURG JJ. Macrophytes and periphyton carbon subsidies to bacterioplankton and zooplankton in a shallow eutrophic lake in tropical China. Limnology and Oceanography. 2015;60(2):375–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10040.
KÖEPPEN W. Climatologia. Con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. México, FCE. 1948:145-378.
CUNHA JE, CASTRO SS, SALOMÃO FXT. Comportamento erosivo de um sistema pedológico de Umuarama, noroeste do estado do Paraná. R. Bras. Ci. Solo. 1999;23:943-951.
LOBO EA, HEIRICH CG, SCHUCH M, DUPONT A, COSTA AB, WETZEL CE, et al. Índice trófico de qualidade da água: Guia ilustrado para sistemas lóticos subtropicais e temperados brasileiros. Santa Cruz do Sul, EDUNISC. 2016;1.
MANJARE SA, VHANALAKAR SA, MULEY DV. Analysis of Water Quality Using Physico-Chemical Parameters Tamdalge Tank in Kolhapur District, Maharashtra. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research. 2010;1(2):115–119. http://www.bipublication.com
PURMALIS O, KĻAVIŅŠ L, ARBIDANS L. Ecological quality of freshwater lakes and their management applications in urban territory. Research For Rural Development. 2019;1:103–110. https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.25.2019.016.
RIZO-PATRÓN VF, KUMAR A, MCCOY COLTON MB, SPRINGER M, TRAMA FA. Macroinvertebrate communities as bioindicators of water quality in conventional and organic irrigated rice fields in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Ecological Indicators. 2013;29:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.013
RODRIGUES L, BICUDO DC. Similarity among periphyton algal communities in a lentic-lotic gradient of the upper Paraná river floodplain, Brazil. Revta. Brasil. Bota. 2001;24(3):235-248.
ROONEY RC, DAVY C, GILBERT J, PROSSER R, ROBICHAUD C, SHEEDY C. Periphyton bioconcentrates pesticides downstream of catchment dominated by agricultural land use. Science of the total environment. 2020;702.
SCHWARZENBACH RP, EGLI T, HOFSTETTER TB, VON GUNTEN U, WEHRLI B. Global Water Pollution and Human Health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2010;35(1):109–136. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125342
SILVA FK, FONSECA BM, FELISBERTO SA. Community structure of periphytic Zygnematophycea (Streptophyta) in urban eutrophic ponds from central Brazil (Goiânia, GO). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 2018;30.
TAKEDA AK, MENDES FM, MARIN LM. Avaliação da qualidade da água do lago Aratimbó no município de Umuarama /PR. II Congresso Brasileiro de Gestão Ambiental. 2011.
US EPA. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Wadable Streams and Rivers Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish. 1999. EPA 841-B-99-002.
VAN-DEN-HOEK C, MANN DG, JANHS HJA. An Introduction to phycology. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. 1995:623.
WU Y, LIU J, YANG L, CHEN H, ZHANG S, ZHAO H, ZHANG N. Allelopathic control of cyanobacterial blooms by periphyton biofilms. Environmental Microbiology. 2011;13(3):604–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02363.x
ZEBEK E. Differentiation of periphyton and phytoplankton assemblages in anthropogenically transformed conditions of the littoral zone in a shallow urban lake (Lake Jeziorak Mały, Poland). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2013;11(3):323–342. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1103_323342
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-26 (4)
- 2022-04-26 (3)
- 2022-04-06 (2)
- 2020-06-29 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.