Relationships between physical and morphological soil characteristics and growth of Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze., in Passo Fundo, RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25018Abstract
This study investigates the relationships between physical and morphological soil characteristics and growth of Araucaria angustifolia in three types of Passo Fundo, RS National Forest Soils. Soil samples were collected at 0-20 cm deep, in randomly chosen 400 m2 area square plots. Relationships between growth of Araucaria angustifolia and soil characteristics were evaluated by means of a simple linear correlation. The soil characteristics that significantly correlated with growth variables were: structure, silt and clay content, and A horizon thickness.
Downloads
References
ANDRAE, F.H. & KRAPFENBAUER, A. - Inventur einer 17 jährigen Araukarienaufforstung in Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasilien. Centralbl. für das Gesamte Forstwesen, 93 (4): 203-30, 1976.
BLAKE, G.R. - Bulk density. In: BLACK, C.A. Methods of Soil Analysis. Madison, American Society of Agronomy, 1965. Part 1, Cap 30, p. 374-91. (Agronomy, 9).
BLUM, W.E.H. - Ecologia da Araucaria angustifolia e futuras considerações de reflorestamento no Sul do Brasil. Brasil Madeira, Curitiba, (7): 10-12, 1977.
DE HOOGH, R.J. - Site - nutrition - growth relationships of Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. in Southern Brasil. Freiburg. 161 p. Tese Ph. D. 1981.
_____________. & DIETRICH, A.B. - Avaliação de sitio para Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. em povoamentos artificiais. Brasil Florestal, Brasília, (37): 19-71,1979.
EMBRAPA, - Manual de métodos de análise de solo. Rio de Janeiro. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Ministério da Agricultura. Serviço de Levantamento e Conservação de solos. 1979.
FREESE, F. - Metodos estadisticos elementares para tecnicos forestales. México/Buenos Aires. Centro Regional de Ayuda. Agência para el desarollo Internacional (AIO). 1970.105 p. 8.
HOPPE, J.M. - Relações entre dados analíticos do solo, análise foliar e dados de incremento de Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze., na FLONA de Passo Fundo, RS. Curitiba. 90 p. Dissertação (Mestr. Engª Ftal.). UFPR, Curitiba, 1980.
KEMPER, W.D. & CHEPIL, W.S. - Size distribuition of agregation. In: BLACK, C.A. Methods of Soil Analysis. Madison, American Society of Agronomy. 1965. Part 1, Cap 39, p. 499-510. (Agronomy, 9).
LASSERE, S.R., VAIRETTI·, M. & LASSERE, E.N.E. - Crecimiento de Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) O. Kuntze, en distintos tipos de suelos de Piray, Misiones. IDIA, (7): 36-45, 1972. Suplemento Forestal.
OLIVEIRA, L.B. - Determinação da macro e microporosidade pela mesa de tensão, em amostras de solo com estrutura indeformada. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro, (3): 197-200, 1968.
VAN GOOR, C.P. - Classificação da capacidade da terra em relação ao reflorestamento com Pinus elliottii Eng. Var. elliotti e Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze., no Estado de São Paulo. Silvicultura em são Paulo, (4):349-66, 1965/66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
