Synthesis of spirooxindoles with three component reaction between β-ketoesters, malononitrile and isatin derivatives in the presence of Alum.SiO2 nanoparticles as a new nano catalyst
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20834Abstract
In this reseaech, some of the spirooxindole derivaties were prepared via β-ketoesters, malonoitrile and isatin derivatives in the presenceAlum.SiO2 NPs as an effective, recyclable and inexpensive catalyst. The products were identified by IR, 1HNMR, 13C NMR spectr a, andmelting point. The size of nanoparticles characterized by SEM and TEM techniques. A novel multicomponent synthesis of a series ofspirooxindol derivatives is described. The procedures was carried out applying Alum/SiO2 supported on NPS as the novel cataly st givingrise to high to excellent yielded synthetic route of spirooxindol compounds. The major advantages of this protocol are short reaction time,good yields , simple procedure work up as well as friendly synthesis. In this work, some of the spirooxindole derivaties wer e prepared via β-ketoesters, malononitrile and isatin derivatives in the presence Alum.SiO2 NPs as an effective, recyclable and inexpensive catalyst. Theproducts were identified by IR,1HNMR,13CNMR spectra, and melting point. The size of nanoparticles characterized by SEM and TEMtechniques.(scheme 1)Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
