EVALUATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT ROLES IN SALES FOOD INDUSTRIES CASE STUDY FOOD COMPANIES KHORASAN RAZAVI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X19442Keywords:
Information Technology, Internet sales, e-commerce, online advertising, customer relationship management.Abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179460X19442
While many quality products should be only a short time in the market such as, and must give way to the final product tastes, preferences and needs of customers are compatible. Neglect or failure to timely delivery to our customers' requests may be too expensive. These conditions have caused the issue is important information for manufacturing organizations. The purpose of this study was to investigate new methods of information technology, sales of food industry in Iran, with manufacturing units of Khorasan, as a major hub for food production in the country. A questionnaire was developed for this study. Application information technology management by studying four parameters affecting the sale: Official Website, Internet sales of electronic business, Internet advertising and social networking As well as customer relationship management, field tested and evaluated. The results of field research 50 companies in various industries, including: Milk and dairy products, Beverages, Canning and juice, Meat and meat products, Cereal and flour products, Fermentation industry, Additives and spices the target population has been concluded. The results show that if Management of information technology (IT) as a principle and right of sale system used food factories Makes it easy to customer order, reduce the costs of marketing and advertising, and increasing the efficiency of product produced.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.