Arborização urbana na perspectiva de alunos da Escola Estadual João Blos de Campo Bom – RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083916Keywords:
Arborização urbana, Realidade, Meio ambiente, Parque, Árvores diagnósticoAbstract
This article is about the importance of urban trees in the current context. It is a study of urban trees in the city of Campo Bom / RS with young people from 6th grade in an elementary school, where the goal was to promote educational activities aimed at the student's interaction with the environment. The proposed activities were made highlighting the creativity of young people, curiosity, self-esteem and motivation for the development of these proposed activities, as well as the motivation of everyone involved in the project. It is noticed that the study of environmental issues has strengthened the commitment of each one with nature and also aroused the feeling of wanting to spread the ideas in the community. The proposal brought to the youths instigated the desire to experience every step. In addition to a bold project for the community is a socio-cultural project in which young people interact with their environment. This study shows the importance of urban forestry and the contribution of a better quality of life for the general population, especially the city of Campo Bom, the study site.Downloads
References
Almanaque Abril, São Paulo, Ed. Abril, 2008.
BACKES P. Mata Atlântica: As Árvores e a Paisagem. Porto Alegre, Ed. Paisagem do Sul, 2004.
DIAS, G. F. Educação Ambiental: Princípios e Práticas, 6ª ed. Ampliada pelo autor, Ed. Guaia, São Paulo, 2000.
HAGUETE, T. M. F. Metodologias Qualitativas na Sociologia. 6ª Ed. Vozes, Rio de Janeiro, 1995.
MORAES, M. C. Ecologia dos Saberes Complexidade, Transdisciplinaridade e Educação. São Paulo, Ed. Prolibera, 2008.
MULLER J. Orientações Básicas para Manejo da Arborização Urbana. Planejamento e Educação Ambiental, Porto Alegre, Ed. Famurs, 2002.
PUTZKE J. Biodiversidade: O Maior Espetáculo da Terra. Porto Alegre, Ed. Do autor,2006, V. 1,2,3.
PARÂMETROS Curriculares Nacionais, Temas Transversais e Ética / Secretaria de Educação Fundamental, V, 8, Brasilia: MEC/SEF, 1997.
PARÂMETROS Curriculares Nacionais, Meio Ambiente e Saúde, Secretaria de Educação Fundamental, V. 9, Brasilia: MEC/SEF, 1997.
REIGOTA, M. O que é educação ambiental, Coleção Primeiros Passos, São Paulo, Brasilia 1994.
TEIXEIRA I. F. e SANTOS N. R. Z. Arborização de Vias Públicas: ambiente x Vegetação. Santa Cruz do Sul / RS, 2001.
CONTEÚDO URBANO – Disponível em: http: //www.vivaterra.org.br/vivaterra ocupações desordenadas.htm,acesso em: 03 de julho de 2010.às 00h20min. PESQUISA, Projetos de Porto Alegre sobre arborização.
PREFEITURA, Municipal, 135 anos da Chegada dos Primeiros Imigrantes no Brasil, Caxias do Sul, 2009.
SECRETARIA da Agricultura e Meio Ambiente. Amiga Flora uma Árvore da Cidade, Taquara, 2004.
SECRETARIA da agricultura e do Abastecimento, É tempo de Plantar, Emater, Porto Alegre.
SECRETARIA do Meio Ambiente de Caxias do Sul, Meio Ambiente de Verdade, Caxias do Sul, 2003.
SECRETARIA Municipal do Meio Ambiente, Conheça as árvores Mais Encontradas nas Ruas da Cidades, Curitiba.
SECRETARIA Municipal do Meio Ambiente, Gestão Ambiental, Porto Alegre, 2008.
SECRETARIA Municipal do Meio Ambiente, Plantando Sonhos: Faça o Verde Aparecer Plante Árvores, Erechim.
SECRETARIA Municipal do Meio Ambiente, Projeto verdes Caminhos, Tapejara,2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
