Profile of nursing students on medical waste management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813067Palabras clave:
Nursing, Education, Environmental education, Waste management, Medical wasteResumen
The aim of this study was to analyze the conduct of nursing students on medical waste management in their workplace. This is an exploratory, descriptive and cross-sectional study with nursing students performing practical activities or supervised internship in hospitals located in the northern region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. It was verified that the participants had difficulty in identifying and classifying waste groups as mandated by the current legislation (RDC Anvisa n. 306/04). Based on this study, it was found that is essential for future professionals to be aware of actions associated with medical waste management, because nurses are familiar with the service provided to health service users and the waste generated by this service.
Descargas
Citas
ALAGÖZ, B.A.Z; KOCASOY, G. Treatment and disposal alternatives for health-care waste in developing countries – a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Waste Manag Res. [internet] 2007 Feb. 25(1): 83-89. Available from: http://wmr.sagepub.com/content/25/1/83. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X07069497. Access in: 2014 jan 8.
BESERRA, E.P. et al . Educação ambiental e enfermagem: uma integração necessária. Rev. bras. enferm., Brasília , v. 63, n. 5, Oct. 2010 . Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S003471672010000500026&lng=en&nrm=iso. Access in: 16 May 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71672010000500026.
BRASIL. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução da diretoria colegiada (RDC) n° 306 de 7 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre o Regulamento Técnico para o gerenciamento de resíduos de serviços de saúde. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 10 dez. 2004. Seção 1, p. 49-56. [acesso 2012 mar 22]. Available from: www4.anvisa.gov.br/base/visadoc/CP/CP%5B20735-1-0%5D.pdf.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Manual de gerenciamento de resíduos de serviços de saúde / Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2006. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_gerenciamento_residuos.pdf. Access in: 2013 dec 15.
BRASIL, Decreto n° 4.281, de 25 de junho de 2002. Regulamenta a Lei nº 9.795, de 27 de abril de 1999, que institui a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 26 jun.2002. p. 13.
BRASIL, Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de saúde. Resolução 446/2012. Aprova Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos . Available from: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2011/Reso446.DOC. Access in: 2014 May 10.
CAMPONOGARA, S; VIERO, C.M; ERTHAL, G; ROSSATO, G.C. Enfermagem e meio ambiente: uma revisão bibliográfica. Rev enferm UFSM [internet]. 2011; 1(3):472-480. Available from: http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/reufsm/article/view/3268/2397. Access in: 2013 nov 11.
CORRÊA, L.B; LUNARDI, V.L; SANTOS S.S.C. Construção do saber sobre resíduos sólidos de serviços de saúde na formação em saúde. Rev gaúch enferm [internet]. 2008; 29(4): 557-564. Available from: http://seer.ufrgs.br/RevistaGauchadeEnfermagem/article/view/7626. Access in 2013 out 20.
DIAZ, L.F; SAVAGE, G.M, EGGERTH L.L. Alternatives for the treatment and disposal of healthcare wastes in developing countries. Waste Management [internet] Mar 2005; 25(6): 626–637. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X0500036X. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.01.005. Access in: 2013 nov 05.
ELEUTÉRIO, J.P.L; HAMADA, J; PADIM, A.F. Gerenciamento eficaz no tratamento dos Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde - estudo de duas tecnologias. In: Anais 18° Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção; 2008 out 13-16; Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro. Enep; 2008. p. 1-11.
GARCIA, L.P; RAMOS B.G.Z. Gerenciamento dos resíduos de serviços de saúde: uma questão de biossegurança. Cad saúde pública [internet]. 2004. 20(3):744-752. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csp/v20n3/11.pdf. Access in: 2013 dez 5.
LEE, B.K; ELLENBECKER M.J; MOURE-ERSASO, R. Alternatives for treatment and disposal cost reduction of regulated medical wastes. Waste Management [internet] 2004 Nov. 24(2): 143–151. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X03002101. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2003.10.008. Access in 2013 nov 05.
LEONEL, M. Proteção ambiental: uma abordagem através da mudança organizacional relacionada aos resíduos sólidos para qualidade em saúde. [Dissertação]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2002. 109 p.
LOBIONDO-WOOD, G; HABER, J. Pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos; avaliação; crítica e utilização. 4ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2001.
MACEDO, L.C; LAROCCA, L.M; PERNA, P.O; MUNTSCH, S.M.A; DAMACENO, E.F.C; et al. Segregação de resíduos nos serviços de saúde: A educação ambiental em um hospital-escola. Cogitare enferm [internet]. 2007; 12(2):183-188. Available from: http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/cogitare/article/view/6803/6729. Access in 2014 jan 22.
NAIME, R; BARBISAN, C.H. Quantidade de geração de resíduos em seis procedimentos cirúrgicos de portes diferenciados comparados. Revista Monografias Ambientais, Santa Maria. - v. 12 n. 12 ago. 2013, p. 2714- 2725. DOI: 10.5902/223613088881. Available from: http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/remoa/article/view/8908/pdf. Access in: 2014 feb 20.
PACHECO, E.V; HEMAIS, C.A; FONTOURA, G.A.T; RODRIGUES, F.A. Tratamento de resíduos gerados em laboratórios de polímeros: um caso bem sucedido de parceria Universidade-Empresa. Rev Polímeros [internet]. 2003 13(1):14-21. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/po/v13n1/15065. Access in: 2013 jan 12.
PILGER R.R; SCHENATO, F. Classificação dos resíduos de serviços de saúde de um hospital veterinário. Eng Sanit Ambient [internet]. 2008; 13(1): 23-28. Available in: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/esa/v13n1/a04v13n1.pdf. Access in 2013 dez 5.
REIGOTA, M. O que é educação ambiental. São Paulo: Brasiliense; 1994.
PRUSS, A; GIROULT, E; RUSHBROOK, P. Safe Management of Wastes from Health-care Activities. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
SCHNEIDER, V.E; RÊGO, R.C.E; CALDART, V; ORLANDIN, S.M. Manual de Gerenciamento de Resíduos Sólidos de Serviços de Saúde. São Paulo: C. L. R. Balieiro; 2001.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
