Educação ambiental e o educador ambiental: o desafio de elaborar e implantar projetos de educação ambiental nas escolas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085428Keywords:
Environmental Education, Environmental Educator, School and ProjectAbstract
The present paper is about the Environmental Education as well as the Environmental Educator'srole in society, and the difficulties for the development and implementation of EE projects inschools. We also emphasize the importance of social actors and their articulation, so as to exert akind of interference in the environment and quality of life.
Downloads
References
BRANDÃO, C. R. Identidade da Educação Ambiental Brasileira. Brasília, 2004.
CARVALHO, I.C.M. Educação ambiental: a formação do sujeito ecológico. São Paulo: Cortez, 2004.
CARVALHO, I. C. M. A invenção do sujeito ecológico: identidades e subjetividade na formação dos educadores ambientais. In: Sato, M. & Carvalho, I. C. M. (orgs) EducaçãoAmbiental; pesquisa e desafios. Porto Alegre, Artmed, 2005.
DIAS, L. C.; Silveira, R. L.L. Redes, Sociedade e Território. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC, 2005.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia do Oprimido. 4 ed. Ed. Paz e Terra. Rio de Janeiro, 1981.
JACOBI, P. R. Educação ambiental: o desafio da construção de um pensamento crítico, complexo e reflexivo. Educ. Pesqui. [online]. 2005, vol.31, n.2, pp. 233-250. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1517-97022005000200007&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 13/11/2009.
JACOBI, P. R.; MONTEIRO, F. Redes Sociais. In: Encontros e Caminhos: formação de educadores ambientais e coletivos educadores. Vol.2 pp 314-322. Brasília, 2007.
ROSA, A. V. Projetos em Educação Ambiental. In: Encontros e Caminhos: formação de educadores ambientais e coletivos educadores. Vol.2 pp 274-287. Brasília, 2007.
TRISTÃO, M. As dimensões e os desafios da educação ambientalna sociedade do conhecimento. In: RUSHEINSKY, A. (Org.). Educação ambiental: abordagens múltiplas.Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
