A aquariofilia como ferramenta de educação ambiental para conservação da biodiversidade

Authors

  • Vinicius Ferreira Ardel Universidade Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP
  • Solange Alves Duarte dos Santos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084613

Keywords:

Environmental Education, Aquarium, Parameters of Water, Biodiversity, Awareness

Abstract

This article aims to show how the aquarium can be an important tool for Environmental Education,a hobby that has been expanding steadily in Brazil. The aquarium, as a form of entertainment,work or research, allows the direct observation of nature countless mysteries of the submarinewhile it analyzes the diverse ways of life of the species that inhabit it. The theoretical concepts ofenvironmental conditions existing in nature and any changes occurring in the artificial medium,allows the hobbyist to expand their knowledge, acquire sufficient concepts, and also provides youwith skills needed to provide a suitable environment for the vital requirements of aquatic life. Theaquarium in Environmental Education, aims to pure and applied research in the maintenance andreproduction of aquatic organisms in semi-closed systems in association with the preservation ofthe environment through activities restocking and reintroduction of agencies, and publicawareness for biodiversity conservation. Still, the aquarium can collaborate with the teaching ofthe chemical, physical and biological water.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

O AQUÁRIO: A NATUREZA VIVA EM SUA CASA. PRODAC; P. 3, 18, 19, 24. 2008.

NACCARATO W.; BROTTO R.O. O AQUÁRISMO MARINHO: TEORIA E PRÁTICA. SÃO PAULO – BRASIL: MARAZUL; P. 5, 17, 18, 19, 56, 69, 74, 75; 1990.

TALARICO A.; REV. AQUA MAGAZINE; ED. 2; 2006.

SILVA M.M.; REV. AQUARISTA JUNIOR; ED. 123; AGO - SET / 2008.

GOMES S.; O AQUÁRIO MARINHO & AS ROCHAS VIVAS; 1996, REVISADO EM 1999.

ANDREWS A.; EXELL A.; CARRINGTON N.; THE MANUAL OF FISH HEALTH; SALAMANDER BOOKS; 1988.

AGUILAR R.; HERNÁNDEZ-DIVERS S.M.; HERNÁNDEZ-DIVERS S.J.; ANIMAIS EXÓTICOS: ATLAS DE MEDICINA, TERAPÊUTICA E PATOLOGIA DE. SÃO CAETANO DO SUL – SÃO PAULO. INTERBOOK; P. 17,81,82,83,85,86; 2007.

BALDISSEROTTO B. FISIOLOGIA DE PEIXES APLICADA À PISCICULTURA. SANTA MARIA; EDITORAUFSM; P. 53, 74, 125. 2009

Downloads

Published

2012-03-12

How to Cite

Ardel, V. F., & Santos, S. A. D. dos. (2012). A aquariofilia como ferramenta de educação ambiental para conservação da biodiversidade. Monografias Ambientais, 6(6), 1238–1243. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084613

Issue

REMOA, V. 6, N. 6, MAR., 2012

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.