Proposta de coleta seletiva na Escola Estadual “Professor Cyro Barreiros” como ferramenta para educação ambiental

Authors

  • Valcira Cristina Miranda Universidade Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084446

Keywords:

Environmental Education, Sustainability, Solid Waste, Selective Collection

Abstract

Nowadays, the environmental issues have opened a discussion about the essentialchanges that must be taken to terminate,reduce or mitigate environmental degradation.Considering, education stands out as a means to transform society, in this case, through theselective collection show the school communitythe importance of developing a new ethics,sustainability.According to the National Curriculum Parameters, Environmental Education shouldbe developed in an integrated, continuous and permanent at all levels and types of education.Knowing that solid waste is one of the issues that most affect, directly and / orindirectly, all socioenvironmentalissues, so this project was developed in order to minimize this issue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDRADE, D. F. Implementação da Educação Ambiental em escolas: uma reflexão. In: Fundação Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, v. 4.out/nov/dez 2000.

AZEVEDO, C. J. C. de. Concepção e prática da população em relação ao lixo domiciliar na área central da cidade de Uruguaiana- RS. Uruguaiana, PUCRS- Campus II, 1996. Monografia de pósgraduação. Educação ambiental.

CALDERONI, S. Os bilhões perdidos no lixo. São Paulo: Ed. Humanistas, 1997.

LEMOS, J. C.; LIMA, S. do C. Segregação de resíduos de serviços de saúde para reduzir os riscos à saúde pública e ao meio ambiente. Bioscience Journal. Vol.15, n.2,. Uberlândia: Universidade federal de Uberlândia, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-23

How to Cite

Miranda, V. C. (2012). Proposta de coleta seletiva na Escola Estadual “Professor Cyro Barreiros” como ferramenta para educação ambiental. Monografias Ambientais, 5(5), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084446

Issue

REMOA, V. 5, 2012, EDIÇÃO ESPECIAL: II CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.